Run a multi-step or unattended agent loop safely — sequential pipelines, implement→review→fix (PR) loops, parallel fan-out, and RFC→DAG orchestration. Use when the user wants to "loop", "run autonomously", "iterate until it's done", chain `claude -p` calls, fan out parallel agents on a spec, or set up an implement→verify→commit cycle. Covers the cross-iteration context bridge and the de-sloppify pass. Not for a single one-shot task.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl --skill running-agent-loops --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Running Agent Loops?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cristhianzl-running-agent-loops-claude-skills-czl)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: running-agent-loops
description: Run a multi-step or unattended agent loop safely — sequential pipelines, implement→review→fix (PR) loops, parallel fan-out, and RFC→DAG orchestration. Use when the user wants to "loop", "run autonomously", "iterate until it's done", chain `claude -p` calls, fan out parallel agents on a spec, or set up an implement→verify→commit cycle. Covers the cross-iteration context bridge and the de-sloppify pass. Not for a single one-shot task.
license: MIT
---
# Running agent loops
Patterns for driving work across **many steps or iterations** — possibly unattended — without the run drifting, looping, or shipping slop. The core trade is **isolation vs. continuity**: a fresh context per step avoids bleed, but you must deliberately carry forward what matters.
## Read first (always)
List `learnings/` and read anything relevant. Project-specific loop conventions, budgets, and stop signals live there and override this file.
## Principles (apply to every loop)
- **Fresh context per step beats one long context.** Each `claude -p` / subagent call starts clean — no bleed, no drift. The cost: it forgets. Bridge it deliberately (below).
- **The reviewer is never the author.** Put review/verify in a separate step/context so it isn't anchored to the implementation.
- **Two focused passes beat one constrained pass.** Don't pile negative instructions onto the implementer — add a separate **de-sloppify** pass (below). Quality from constraints decays; quality from a dedicated cleanup step doesn't.
- **Every loop has an explicit stop condition.** Bound it by max-runs, max-cost, max-duration, or a completion signal — never "until it feels done".
## The patterns (pick the simplest that fits)
| Pattern | Use when | Shape |
|---|---|---|
| **Sequential pipeline** | A known series of steps on one unit of work | implement → de-sloppify → verify → commit, each a fresh context |
| **PR loop** | Iterate a branch toward green | branch → implement → review → fix → run checks → repeat until checks pass or budget hits |
| **Parallel fan-out** | N independent variations/units of the same spec | an orchestrator **assigns** each agent a distinct direction + index (don't rely on agents to self-differentiate); run in waves of 3–5 |
| **RFC → DAG** | A large feature with dependencies | decompose into work units + a dependency DAG; run each in an isolated worktree; land via a merge queue; deeper review tier for riskier units |
## The cross-iteration context bridge
Independent steps lose memory. Persist a single **`SHARED_TASK_NOTES.md`** (or the project's plan file): the agent **reads it at the start of each iteration and updates it at the end** — current objective, what's done, what's next, decisions, and gotchas. This is what turns isolated calls into a coherent run.
## The de-sloppify pass
After each implement step, run a **dedicated cleanup pass** (separate agent/context) whose only job is to remove slop: dead code, stray comments, debug prints, half-finished branches, inconsistent naming, over-engineering. Keep it separate from the implementer so neither job is diluted.
## Safety before you launch an unattended loop
- Baseline **tests pass** before iteration 1.
- An explicit **stop condition** and a **budget** (runs / cost / time).
- **Rollback** ready: work on a branch or in a worktree, commit per green step.
- **Checkpoints** so you can diff now-vs-then.
- **Escalate to the human** when: no progress across two consecutive checkpoints, the same error/stack repeats, the diff drifts off-objective, or the budget is exceeded. Stalling silently is the failure mode.
If a loop is wedged (looping, repeating an identical failed action, burning budget), switch to `skills/debugging-agent-runs`.
## Capture a learning
If you hit a loop convention, stop-signal, or trap not covered here, append a `learnings/YYYY-MM-DD-slug.md` (or use `/learn`).
## See also
- `/dual-review` command — the adversarial two-reviewer convergence step for a PR loop.
- `skills/debugging-agent-runs` — recover a wedged run.
- `skills/reviewing-code`, `skills/writing-pull-requests` — the review/PR steps a loop calls.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!