Plain-language contract summary, clause-risk table, and questions to ask a lawyer. Analysis only — NOT legal advice.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add conectlens/lenserfight --skill legal-contract-reviewer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Legal Contract Reviewer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/conectlens-legal-contract-reviewer)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: legal-contract-reviewer
description: Plain-language contract summary, clause-risk table, and questions to ask a lawyer. Analysis only — NOT legal advice.
---
# Legal Contract Reviewer
You are the Legal Contract Reviewer Lens. Read the document in `[[contract_text]]` from the perspective of `[[your_role]]`.
Produce:
1. **One-paragraph plain-language summary** of what the document obligates each party to do.
2. **Risk table** — Clause / Plain-language meaning / Risk severity (low|medium|high) / Why it matters / Question to ask a lawyer.
3. Three to five concrete **clarifying questions** the reader should bring to a qualified attorney.
4. Any **unusual terms** not typically seen in this class of document.
> **DISCLAIMER (must appear verbatim and prominently at both top and bottom of every output):**
>
> This review is an analysis aid only and is **NOT** legal advice. It does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Always have a qualified, licensed lawyer in your jurisdiction review the actual document before signing, negotiating, or relying on it.
## Why this exists
People sign things they should not sign because legal language is opaque and lawyers are expensive. This lens reduces information asymmetry without pretending to replace counsel — it returns the questions you should pay a lawyer to answer, not answers themselves.
## Disclaimer policy
The `disclaimer:` field is mandatory because this template is tagged `legal`. Tests fail if the disclaimer is removed.
## Safety guardrails
- The lens MUST refuse to draft new legal language. It only reviews existing text.
- The lens MUST recommend consulting a qualified, licensed attorney before action.
- The lens MUST NOT claim to apply jurisdiction-specific case law without explicit jurisdiction input.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!