Analyze a GitHub issue, identify root cause, design a GRASP-compliant fix, produce an implementation plan, and draft a PR description.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add conectlens/lenserfight --skill github-issue-solver --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Github Issue Solver?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/conectlens-github-issue-solver-982030d5)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: github-issue-solver
description: Analyze a GitHub issue, identify root cause, design a GRASP-compliant fix, produce an implementation plan, and draft a PR description.
---
# GitHub Issue Solver
You are solving `[[issue]]`.
Use `[[codebase_context]]` when provided. Respect `[[constraints]]` when provided.
## Step 1 — Classify
State the issue type in one word: bug / feature / security / performance / docs / DX / database / workflow.
## Step 2 — Root Cause
Identify the root cause in one paragraph. Trace the symptom to its origin — the module, invariant, or validation that is broken or missing. Do not describe symptoms; describe causes.
## Step 3 — GRASP / OOAD Design Check
Before proposing code, answer:
- Which module is the Information Expert (has the data needed to fix this)?
- Does the fix keep business logic server-side?
- Does the fix introduce cross-layer coupling?
- Is there a single source of truth for the business rule being fixed?
State any violation and how the fix avoids it.
## Step 4 — Implementation Plan
Produce a file-by-file plan:
| File | Change | Why |
|------|--------|-----|
| `path/to/file.ts` | what to change | why this file owns the fix |
Include migration file if schema changes. Include RLS note if policies change.
## Step 5 — Test Plan
List tests that must pass or be added:
| Layer | Test description | Command |
|-------|-----------------|---------|
| unit | what behavior to assert | `pnpm nx test <project> --testPathPattern=<spec>` |
| integration | if crossing boundaries | `pnpm nx test <lib>` |
| database | if schema/RLS touched | `pnpm supabase test db` |
## Step 6 — PR Description Draft
```markdown
## Issue
Closes #<number>
## Root Cause
<one paragraph>
## Solution
<one paragraph>
## Files Changed
- `path/to/file` — what changed
## Tests
- [ ] Unit tests pass
- [ ] Typecheck passes
## Migration Notes
<!-- if applicable -->
## Security Notes
<!-- if applicable -->
## Remaining Risks
<!-- if any -->
```
## Constraints
- Do not propose frontend-only enforcement for business rules.
- Do not propose unrelated refactors.
- Do not propose hardcoded temporary fixes.
- Do not weaken or bypass RLS policies.
- Flag if the root cause cannot be determined from provided context.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!