Skip to content
Back to skills

SKILL.md — Paper2Protocol Skill Definition

ASecurity

**Version:** 1.2 **Created:** 2026-03-20 **License:** CC BY-NC 4.0

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 4 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
researchpythongoshellbashnodeexpresstestinggitapidatabase

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add ChrisLou-bioinfo/Paper2Protocol --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of SKILL.md — Paper2Protocol Skill Definition?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for SKILL.md — Paper2Protocol Skill Definition
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/chrislou-bioinfo-skill-md-paper2protocol-skill-definition/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/chrislou-bioinfo-skill-md-paper2protocol-skill-definition)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
# SKILL.md — Paper2Protocol Skill Definition

**Version:** 1.2
**Created:** 2026-03-20
**License:** CC BY-NC 4.0

## Overview

From published high-impact primary literature, reverse-engineer complete experimental validation plans — transforming scientific discoveries into executable research protocols.

**Core Principle: Only use primary sources (PMC full-text, journal PDFs), never abstracts or second-hand reviews.**

---

## Input Requirements

### ✅ Accepted
- PMC full-text (NCBI PubMed Central, Open Access)
- Journal website PDFs (Nature/Science/Cell, peer-reviewed)
- DeepReader-generated full-text analysis documents

### ❌ Rejected
- Abstracts only
- News articles / media interpretations
- Review articles (as primary input)
- AI-generated summaries (not based on primary sources)

### Input Formats
1. **PMC URL** → Auto-fetch full text
2. **PDF file** → Direct analysis
3. **Paper title** → Search PMC for full text

---

## Workflow (5 Stages)

### Stage 1: Source Acquisition & Quality Assessment

1. Validate input as primary source
2. Fetch full text (PMC API / PDF parsing)
3. Quality rating:
   - Journal tier (CNS / sub-journal / field-top / other)
   - Research type (basic / clinical / translational)
   - Data completeness (supplementary materials, raw data links)
   - Reproducibility (method detail, sample size)

### Stage 2: Scientific Logic Deconstruction

Extract complete scientific logic:

1. **Core Scientific Question**: What problem does this paper solve?
2. **Research Strategy**: Hypothesis, models (in vivo/in vitro/in silico/clinical), key techniques
3. **Validation Chain**:
   ```
   Hypothesis → Key Experiment 1 → Key Experiment 2 → ... → Conclusion
   ```
   Annotate purpose and expected outcome at each node.
4. **Innovation Analysis**: Methodological, conceptual, and application innovations.

### Stage 3: Executable Experimental Paths

#### 3.1 Experiment Layering
- **Must-do**: Core experiments validating the hypothesis
- **Should-do**: Supporting experiments
- **Nice-to-do**: Mechanism deep-dives or scope extensions

#### 3.2 Per-Experiment Details

| Field | Content |
|-------|---------|
| Experiment Name | Specific name |
| Purpose | Role in validation chain |
| Method | Detailed protocol (paper Methods + best practices) |
| Samples/Materials | Cell lines, animal models, clinical samples |
| Sample Size | Statistically required minimum |
| Key Reagents | Brand, catalog reference, concentration |
| Equipment | Required instruments + alternatives |
| Expected Results | Positive/negative controls, data type |
| Timeline | Per-experiment duration + replicates |
| Budget | Reagents + consumables + services |
| Risk Assessment | Failure causes + backup plans |

#### 3.3 Bioinformatics Analysis (if applicable)

| Field | Content |
|-------|---------|
| Analysis Goal | Specific task |
| Data Source | Public databases (TCGA/GEO) or generated data |
| Tools | Recommended pipeline (R/Python/online) |
| Key Parameters | Standard settings |
| Expected Output | Figure types, statistics |
| Compute Resources | Local/server/cloud requirements |

#### 3.4 Bioinformatics Code (REQUIRED when analysis involves bioinformatics)

**When experiments involve bioinformatics, complete runnable code MUST be provided.**

Requirements:
- **Language**: R (Bioconductor) or Python (R preferred)
- **Completeness**: End-to-end, data download to publication figures
- **Comments**: Key steps annotated in English
- **Data Sources**: Prioritize public databases (TCGA, GEO, Beat-AML)
- **Standard Tools**: ssGSEA/GSEA, DESeq2, CIBERSORTx/xCell, survival, ComplexHeatmap
- **Statistical Rigor**: Multiple testing correction (BH), power analysis

Coverage:
1. **Subtype Classification**: ssGSEA + K-means/Hierarchical clustering
2. **Differential Expression**: DESeq2/edgeR → volcano plot
3. **Survival Analysis**: Kaplan-Meier + Cox regression + ROC (timeROC)
4. **Gene Enrichment**: GSEA + ssGSEA + Hallmark/Immunologic gene sets
5. **Immune Microenvironment**: CIBERSORTx/xCell deconvolution
6. **Heatmaps**: ComplexHeatmap / pheatmap
7. **Prognostic Models**: LASSO Cox + glmnet + Nomogram (rms)
8. **Flow Cytometry**: FlowJo export → Python statistical analysis
9. **Panel Selection**: LASSO + Random Forest intersection → minimal gene set
10. **Automation**: Bash shell script to chain all analysis steps

#### 3.5 Budget Summary

```
Phase 1 (Core Validation): $XX,XXX
  - Reagents: $X,XXX
  - Consumables: $X,XXX
  - Services (sequencing): $XX,XXX
  - Animals: $X,XXX

Phase 2 (Mechanism): $XX,XXX
...

Total: $XXX,XXX – $XXX,XXX
```

### Stage 4: Extension Projects (2-3 proposals)

Each includes:
- **Project Name**
- **Scientific Question**
- **Innovation** vs original paper
- **Feasibility**: ⭐ rating (technical difficulty, resources, timeline)
- **Expected Outcomes**: Paper tier, patent potential, clinical value
- **Risk Assessment**: Bottlenecks and failure risks

### Stage 5: Multi-Paper Synthesis (Accumulation Mode)

Triggered when ≥3 papers accumulate per topic:

- **By Scientific Question**: Group papers by shared research questions
- **By Method**: Rank techniques by frequency → prioritize platform setup
- **Integrated Roadmap**: Deduplicate protocols, consolidate budgets
- **Research Timeline**: 12-month plan based on synthesis

---

## Output Format

### Standard Structure

```markdown
# 📋 [Paper Title] → Experimental Validation Plan

## 📄 Paper Information
## 🔬 Part 1: Validation Logic
## 🧪 Part 2: Executable Experimental Paths
## 💻 Part 3: Bioinformatics Code (if applicable)
## 🚀 Part 4: Extension Projects
## 📝 Execution Recommendations
```

### Output Formats
- **Markdown** (default)
- **PDF Report** (HTML → browser print, all tables and code blocks)
- **Any document platform** (Feishu, Notion, etc.)

---

## Storage & Indexing

```
literature-to-experiment/
├─ index.json
├─ by_project/
│  └─ [Project Name]/
│     └─ PMCxxxxxx_protocol.md
├─ by_topic/
│  └─ [Topic Name]/
└─ summaries/
   └─ [Topic]_synthesis.md
```

---

## Notes

1. **Pricing**: Based on 2025-2026 market rates, marked "reference price"
2. **Sample Size**: Follows statistical principles, power analysis recommended
3. **Ethics**: Mark IRB/IACUC requirements for human/animal studies
4. **Timeliness**: Flag methods >5 years old for verification
5. **Code**: Must provide complete runnable code for bioinformatics analyses

---

## Dependencies

- **DeepReader**: Full-text analysis (pre-requisite step)
- **academic-paper**: If integrating plans into papers

## License

CC BY-NC 4.0 — Free for academic use with attribution. No commercial use without permission.

## Authors

- Jiacheng Lou ([GitHub](https://github.com/ChrisLou-bioinfo))
- 🦞 Claw (AI Research Assistant)

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md6.7 KB
  • docs/LICENSE-NOTES.md70 B
  • docs/workflow.md3.8 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.