Lightweight execution engine - multi-mode input, task grouping, batch execution, chain to workflow-lite-test-review
Scanned 9/7/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow --skill workflow-lite-execute --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Workflow Lite Execute?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/catlog22-workflow-lite-execute)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: workflow-lite-execute
description: Lightweight execution engine - multi-mode input, task grouping, batch execution, chain to workflow-lite-test-review
allowed-tools: Skill, Agent, AskUserQuestion, TodoWrite, Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep
---
# Workflow-Lite-Execute
Execution engine for workflow-lite-plan handoff and standalone task execution.
---
## Usage
```
<input> Task description string, or path to file (required)
```
| Flag | Description |
|------|-------------|
| `--in-memory` | Mode 1: Use executionContext from workflow-lite-plan handoff (via Skill({ skill: "workflow-lite-execute", args: "--in-memory" }) |
## Input Modes
### Mode 1: In-Memory Plan
**Trigger**: `--in-memory` flag or `executionContext` global variable available
**Input Source**: `executionContext` global variable set by workflow-lite-plan
**Behavior**: Skip execution method/code review selection (already chosen in LP-Phase 4), directly proceed with full context (exploration, clarifications, plan artifacts all available)
> **Note**: LP-Phase 4 is the single confirmation gate. Mode 1 invocation means user already approved — no further prompts.
### Mode 2: Prompt Description
**Trigger**: User calls with task description string (e.g., "Add unit tests for auth module")
**Behavior**: Store prompt as `originalUserInput` → create simple execution plan → run `selectExecutionOptions()` → proceed
### Mode 3: File Content
**Trigger**: User calls with file path (ends with .md/.json/.txt)
```javascript
fileContent = Read(filePath)
try {
jsonData = JSON.parse(fileContent)
// plan.json detection: two-layer format with task_ids[]
if (jsonData.summary && jsonData.approach && jsonData.task_ids) {
planObject = jsonData
originalUserInput = jsonData.summary
isPlanJson = true
const planDir = filePath.replace(/[/\\][^/\\]+$/, '')
planObject._loadedTasks = loadTaskFiles(planDir, jsonData.task_ids)
} else {
originalUserInput = fileContent
isPlanJson = false
}
} catch {
originalUserInput = fileContent
isPlanJson = false
}
```
- `isPlanJson === true`: Use `planObject` directly → run `selectExecutionOptions()`
- `isPlanJson === false`: Treat as prompt (same as Mode 2)
### User Selection (Mode 2/3 shared)
```javascript
function selectExecutionOptions() {
// autoYes: set by -y flag (standalone only; Mode 1 never reaches here)
const autoYes = workflowPreferences?.autoYes ?? false
if (autoYes) {
return { execution_method: "Auto", code_review_tool: "Skip", convergence_review_tool: "Skip" }
}
return AskUserQuestion({
questions: [
{
question: "Select execution method:",
header: "Execution",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" },
{ label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" },
{ label: "Auto", description: "Auto-select based on complexity" }
]
},
{
question: "Code review after execution? (runs here in lite-execute)",
header: "Code Review",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI: git diff quality review" },
{ label: "Codex Review", description: "Codex CLI: prompt-based code quality review (--mode analysis)" },
{ label: "Agent Review", description: "@code-reviewer agent" },
{ label: "Skip", description: "No code review" }
]
},
{
question: "Convergence review in workflow-lite-test-review phase?",
header: "Convergence Review",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Agent", description: "Agent: verify convergence criteria" },
{ label: "Gemini", description: "Gemini CLI: convergence verification" },
{ label: "Codex", description: "Codex CLI: convergence verification" },
{ label: "Skip", description: "Skip convergence review, run tests only" }
]
}
]
})
}
```
## Execution Steps
### Step 1: Initialize & Echo Strategy
```javascript
previousExecutionResults = []
// Mode 1: echo strategy for transparency
if (executionContext) {
console.log(`
Execution Strategy (from lite-plan):
Method: ${executionContext.executionMethod}
Code Review: ${executionContext.codeReviewTool}
Convergence Review: ${executionContext.convergenceReviewTool}
Tasks: ${getTasks(executionContext.planObject).length}
Complexity: ${executionContext.planObject.complexity}
${executionContext.executorAssignments ? ` Assignments: ${JSON.stringify(executionContext.executorAssignments)}` : ''}
`)
}
// Helper: load .task/*.json files (two-layer format)
function loadTaskFiles(planDir, taskIds) {
return taskIds.map(id => JSON.parse(Read(`${planDir}/.task/${id}.json`)))
}
function getTasks(planObject) {
return planObject._loadedTasks || []
}
```
### Step 2: Task Grouping & Batch Creation
```javascript
// Dependency extraction: explicit depends_on only (no file/keyword inference)
function extractDependencies(tasks) {
const taskIdToIndex = {}
tasks.forEach((t, i) => { taskIdToIndex[t.id] = i })
return tasks.map((task, i) => {
const deps = (task.depends_on || [])
.map(depId => taskIdToIndex[depId])
.filter(idx => idx !== undefined && idx < i)
return { ...task, taskIndex: i, dependencies: deps }
})
}
// Executor resolution: executorAssignments[taskId] > executionMethod > Auto fallback
function getTaskExecutor(task) {
const assignments = executionContext?.executorAssignments || {}
if (assignments[task.id]) return assignments[task.id].executor // 'gemini' | 'codex' | 'agent'
const method = executionContext?.executionMethod || 'Auto'
if (method === 'Agent') return 'agent'
if (method === 'Codex') return 'codex'
return planObject.complexity === 'Low' ? 'agent' : 'codex' // Auto fallback
}
function groupTasksByExecutor(tasks) {
const groups = { gemini: [], codex: [], agent: [] }
tasks.forEach(task => { groups[getTaskExecutor(task)].push(task) })
return groups
}
// Batch creation: independent → per-executor parallel, dependent → sequential phases
function createExecutionCalls(tasks, executionMethod) {
const tasksWithDeps = extractDependencies(tasks)
const processed = new Set()
const calls = []
// Phase 1: Independent tasks → per-executor parallel batches
const independentTasks = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => t.dependencies.length === 0)
if (independentTasks.length > 0) {
const executorGroups = groupTasksByExecutor(independentTasks)
let parallelIndex = 1
for (const [executor, tasks] of Object.entries(executorGroups)) {
if (tasks.length === 0) continue
tasks.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
calls.push({
method: executionMethod, executor, executionType: "parallel",
groupId: `P${parallelIndex++}`,
taskSummary: tasks.map(t => t.title).join(' | '), tasks
})
}
}
// Phase 2+: Dependent tasks → respect dependency order
let sequentialIndex = 1
let remaining = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
while (remaining.length > 0) {
let ready = remaining.filter(t => t.dependencies.every(d => processed.has(d)))
if (ready.length === 0) { console.warn('Circular dependency detected, forcing remaining'); ready = [...remaining] }
if (ready.length > 1) {
const executorGroups = groupTasksByExecutor(ready)
for (const [executor, tasks] of Object.entries(executorGroups)) {
if (tasks.length === 0) continue
tasks.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
calls.push({
method: executionMethod, executor, executionType: "parallel",
groupId: `P${calls.length + 1}`,
taskSummary: tasks.map(t => t.title).join(' | '), tasks
})
}
} else {
ready.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
calls.push({
method: executionMethod, executor: getTaskExecutor(ready[0]),
executionType: "sequential", groupId: `S${sequentialIndex++}`,
taskSummary: ready[0].title, tasks: ready
})
}
remaining = remaining.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
}
return calls
}
executionCalls = createExecutionCalls(getTasks(planObject), executionMethod).map(c => ({ ...c, id: `[${c.groupId}]` }))
TodoWrite({
todos: executionCalls.map((c, i) => ({
content: `${c.executionType === "parallel" ? "⚡" : `→ [${i+1}/${executionCalls.filter(x=>x.executionType==="sequential").length}]`} ${c.id} [${c.executor}] ${c.tasks.map(t=>t.id).join(', ')}`,
status: "pending",
activeForm: `Waiting: ${c.tasks.length} task(s) via ${c.executor}`
}))
})
```
### Step 3: Launch Execution & Track Progress
> **CHECKPOINT**: Verify Phase 2 execution protocol (Step 3-5) is in active memory. If only a summary remains, re-read `phases/02-lite-execute.md` now.
**Batch Routing** (by `batch.executor` field):
```javascript
function executeBatch(batch) {
const executor = batch.executor || getTaskExecutor(batch.tasks[0])
const sessionId = executionContext?.session?.id || 'standalone'
const fixedId = `${sessionId}-${batch.groupId}`
if (executor === 'agent') {
return Agent({ subagent_type: "code-developer", run_in_background: false,
description: batch.taskSummary, prompt: buildExecutionPrompt(batch) })
} else {
// CLI execution (codex/gemini): background with fixed ID
const tool = executor // 'codex' | 'gemini'
const mode = executor === 'gemini' ? 'analysis' : 'write'
const previousCliId = batch.resumeFromCliId || null
const cmd = previousCliId
? `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool ${tool} --mode ${mode} --id ${fixedId} --resume ${previousCliId}`
: `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool ${tool} --mode ${mode} --id ${fixedId}`
return Bash(cmd, { run_in_background: true })
// STOP - wait for task hook callback
}
}
```
**Parallel execution rules**:
- Each batch = one independent CLI instance or Agent call
- Parallel = multiple Bash(run_in_background=true) or multiple Agent() in single message
- Never merge independent tasks into one CLI prompt
- Agent: run_in_background=false, but multiple Agent() calls can be concurrent in single message
**Execution Flow**: Parallel batches concurrently → Sequential batches in order
```javascript
const parallel = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "parallel")
const sequential = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "sequential")
// Phase 1: All parallel batches (single message, multiple tool calls)
if (parallel.length > 0) {
TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
status: c.executionType === "parallel" ? "in_progress" : "pending",
activeForm: c.executionType === "parallel" ? `Running [${c.executor}]: ${c.tasks.map(t=>t.id).join(', ')}` : `Blocked by parallel phase`
})) })
parallelResults = await Promise.all(parallel.map(c => executeBatch(c)))
previousExecutionResults.push(...parallelResults)
TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
status: parallel.includes(c) ? "completed" : "pending",
activeForm: parallel.includes(c) ? `Done [${c.executor}]` : `Ready`
})) })
}
// Phase 2: Sequential batches one by one
for (const call of sequential) {
TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
status: c === call ? "in_progress" : (c.status === "completed" ? "completed" : "pending"),
activeForm: c === call ? `Running [${c.executor}]: ${c.tasks.map(t=>t.id).join(', ')}` : undefined
})) })
result = await executeBatch(call)
previousExecutionResults.push(result)
TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
status: sequential.indexOf(c) <= sequential.indexOf(call) ? "completed" : "pending"
})) })
}
```
**Resume on Failure**:
```javascript
if (bash_result.status === 'failed' || bash_result.status === 'timeout') {
// fixedId = `${sessionId}-${groupId}` (predictable, no auto-generated timestamps)
console.log(`Execution incomplete. Resume: ccw cli -p "Continue" --resume ${fixedId} --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedId}-retry`)
batch.resumeFromCliId = fixedId
}
```
Progress tracked at batch level. Icons: ⚡ parallel (concurrent), → sequential (one-by-one).
### Unified Task Prompt Builder
Each task is a self-contained checklist. Same template for Agent and CLI.
```javascript
function buildExecutionPrompt(batch) {
const formatTask = (t) => `
## ${t.title}
**Scope**: \`${t.scope}\` | **Action**: ${t.action}
### Files
${(t.files || []).map(f => `- **${f.path}** → \`${f.target || ''}\`: ${f.change || (f.changes || []).join(', ') || ''}`).join('\n')}
${t.rationale ? `### Why this approach (Medium/High)
${t.rationale.chosen_approach}
${t.rationale.decision_factors?.length > 0 ? `Key factors: ${t.rationale.decision_factors.join(', ')}` : ''}
${t.rationale.tradeoffs ? `Tradeoffs: ${t.rationale.tradeoffs}` : ''}` : ''}
### How to do it
${t.description}
${t.implementation.map(step => `- ${step}`).join('\n')}
${t.code_skeleton ? `### Code skeleton (High)
${t.code_skeleton.interfaces?.length > 0 ? `**Interfaces**: ${t.code_skeleton.interfaces.map(i => `\`${i.name}\` - ${i.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
${t.code_skeleton.key_functions?.length > 0 ? `**Functions**: ${t.code_skeleton.key_functions.map(f => `\`${f.signature}\` - ${f.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
${t.code_skeleton.classes?.length > 0 ? `**Classes**: ${t.code_skeleton.classes.map(c => `\`${c.name}\` - ${c.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}` : ''}
### Reference
- Pattern: ${t.reference?.pattern || 'N/A'}
- Files: ${t.reference?.files?.join(', ') || 'N/A'}
${t.reference?.examples ? `- Notes: ${t.reference.examples}` : ''}
${t.risks?.length > 0 ? `### Risk mitigations (High)
${t.risks.map(r => `- ${r.description} → **${r.mitigation}**`).join('\n')}` : ''}
### Done when
${(t.convergence?.criteria || []).map(c => `- [ ] ${c}`).join('\n')}
${(t.test?.success_metrics || []).length > 0 ? `**Success metrics**: ${t.test.success_metrics.join(', ')}` : ''}`
const sections = []
if (originalUserInput) sections.push(`## Goal\n${originalUserInput}`)
sections.push(`## Tasks\n${batch.tasks.map(formatTask).join('\n\n---\n')}`)
const context = []
if (previousExecutionResults.length > 0)
context.push(`### Previous Work\n${previousExecutionResults.map(r => `- ${r.tasksSummary}: ${r.status}`).join('\n')}`)
if (clarificationContext)
context.push(`### Clarifications\n${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `- ${q}: ${a}`).join('\n')}`)
if (executionContext?.planObject?.data_flow?.diagram)
context.push(`### Data Flow\n${executionContext.planObject.data_flow.diagram}`)
if (executionContext?.session?.artifacts?.plan)
context.push(`### Artifacts\nPlan: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`)
context.push(`### Project Guidelines\n(Loaded via ccw spec load --category planning)`)
if (context.length > 0) sections.push(`## Context\n${context.join('\n\n')}`)
sections.push(`Complete each task according to its "Done when" checklist.`)
return sections.join('\n\n')
}
```
### Step 4: Code Review
**Skip if**: `codeReviewTool === 'Skip'`
**Resolve review tool**: From `executionContext.codeReviewTool` (Mode 1) or `userSelection.code_review_tool` (Mode 2/3).
```javascript
const codeReviewTool = executionContext?.codeReviewTool || userSelection?.code_review_tool || 'Skip'
const resolvedTool = (() => {
if (!codeReviewTool || codeReviewTool === 'Skip') return 'skip'
if (/gemini/i.test(codeReviewTool)) return 'gemini'
if (/codex/i.test(codeReviewTool)) return 'codex'
return 'agent'
})()
if (resolvedTool === 'skip') {
console.log('[Code Review] Skipped')
} else {
// proceed with review
}
```
**Agent Code Review** (resolvedTool === 'agent'):
```javascript
Agent({
subagent_type: "code-reviewer",
run_in_background: false,
description: `Code review: ${planObject.summary}`,
prompt: `## Code Review — Post-Execution Quality Check
**Goal**: ${originalUserInput}
**Plan Summary**: ${planObject.summary}
### Changed Files
Run \`git diff --name-only HEAD~${getTasks(planObject).length}..HEAD\` to identify changes.
### Review Focus
1. **Code quality**: Readability, naming, structure, dead code
2. **Correctness**: Logic errors, off-by-one, null handling, edge cases
3. **Patterns**: Consistency with existing codebase conventions
4. **Security**: Injection, XSS, auth bypass, secrets exposure
5. **Performance**: Unnecessary loops, N+1 queries, missing indexes
### Instructions
1. Run git diff to see actual changes
2. Read changed files for full context
3. For each issue found: severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low) + file:line + description + fix suggestion
4. Return structured review: issues[], summary, overall verdict (PASS/WARN/FAIL)`
})
```
**CLI Code Review — Codex** (resolvedTool === 'codex'):
```javascript
const reviewId = `${sessionId}-code-review`
Bash(`ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Post-execution code quality review for: ${planObject.summary}
TASK: • Run git diff to identify all changes • Review each changed file for quality, correctness, security • Check pattern compliance with existing codebase • Identify potential bugs, edge cases, performance issues
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: lite-execute completed, reviewing code quality
EXPECTED: Per-file review with severity levels (Critical/High/Medium/Low), file:line references, fix suggestions, overall verdict
CONSTRAINTS: Read-only | Focus on code quality not convergence" --tool codex --mode analysis --rule analysis-review-code-quality --id ${reviewId}`, { run_in_background: true })
// STOP - wait for hook callback
```
**CLI Code Review — Gemini** (resolvedTool === 'gemini'):
```javascript
const reviewId = `${sessionId}-code-review`
Bash(`ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Post-execution code quality review for: ${planObject.summary}
TASK: • Run git diff to identify all changes • Review each changed file for quality, correctness, security • Check pattern compliance with existing codebase • Identify potential bugs, edge cases, performance issues
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: lite-execute completed, reviewing code quality
EXPECTED: Per-file review with severity levels (Critical/High/Medium/Low), file:line references, fix suggestions, overall verdict
CONSTRAINTS: Read-only | Focus on code quality not convergence" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-review-code-quality --id ${reviewId}`, { run_in_background: true })
// STOP - wait for hook callback
```
**Write review artifact** (if session folder exists):
```javascript
if (executionContext?.session?.folder) {
Write(`${executionContext.session.folder}/code-review.md`, codeReviewOutput)
}
```
### Step 5: Chain to Test Review & Post-Completion
**Resolve convergence review tool**: From `executionContext.convergenceReviewTool` (Mode 1) or `userSelection.convergence_review_tool` (Mode 2/3).
```javascript
function resolveConvergenceTool(ctx, selection) {
const raw = ctx?.convergenceReviewTool || selection?.convergence_review_tool || 'skip'
if (!raw || raw === 'Skip') return 'skip'
if (/gemini/i.test(raw)) return 'gemini'
if (/codex/i.test(raw)) return 'codex'
return 'agent'
}
```
**Build testReviewContext and handoff**:
```javascript
testReviewContext = {
planObject: planObject,
taskFiles: executionContext?.taskFiles
|| getTasks(planObject).map(t => ({ id: t.id, path: `${executionContext?.session?.folder}/.task/${t.id}.json` })),
convergenceReviewTool: resolveConvergenceTool(executionContext, userSelection),
executionResults: previousExecutionResults,
originalUserInput: originalUserInput,
session: executionContext?.session || {
id: 'standalone',
folder: executionContext?.session?.folder || '.',
artifacts: { plan: null, task_dir: null }
}
}
// Chain to workflow-lite-test-review (Mode 1: In-Memory)
Skill("workflow-lite-test-review")
// testReviewContext passed as global variable
```
**After workflow-lite-test-review returns**: Ask user whether to expand into issues (enhance/refactor/doc). Selected items call `/issue:new "{summary} - {dimension}"`.
## Error Handling
| Error | Resolution |
|-------|------------|
| Missing executionContext | "No execution context found. Only available when called by lite-plan." |
| File not found | "File not found: {path}. Check file path." |
| Empty file | "File is empty: {path}. Provide task description." |
| Invalid plan JSON | Warning: "Missing required fields. Treating as plain text." |
| Malformed JSON | Treat as plain text (expected for non-JSON files) |
| Execution failure | Use fixed ID `${sessionId}-${groupId}` for resume |
| Execution timeout | Use fixed ID for resume with extended timeout |
| Codex unavailable | Show installation instructions, offer Agent execution |
| Fixed ID not found | Check `ccw cli history`, verify date directories |
## Data Structures
### executionContext (Input - Mode 1)
```javascript
{
planObject: {
summary: string,
approach: string,
task_ids: string[],
task_count: number,
_loadedTasks: [...], // populated at runtime from .task/*.json
estimated_time: string,
recommended_execution: string,
complexity: string
},
taskFiles: [{id: string, path: string}] | null,
explorationsContext: {...} | null,
explorationAngles: string[],
explorationManifest: {...} | null,
clarificationContext: {...} | null,
executionMethod: "Agent" | "Codex" | "Auto",
codeReviewTool: "Skip" | "Gemini Review" | "Codex Review" | "Agent Review",
convergenceReviewTool: "Skip" | "Agent" | "Gemini" | "Codex",
originalUserInput: string,
executorAssignments: { // per-task override, priority over executionMethod
[taskId]: { executor: "gemini" | "codex" | "agent", reason: string }
},
session: {
id: string, // {taskSlug}-{shortTimestamp}
folder: string, // .workflow/.lite-plan/{session-id}
artifacts: {
explorations: [{angle, path}],
explorations_manifest: string,
plan: string // always present
}
}
}
```
### executionResult (Output)
```javascript
{
executionId: string, // e.g., "[Agent-1]", "[Codex-1]"
status: "completed" | "partial" | "failed",
tasksSummary: string,
completionSummary: string,
keyOutputs: string,
notes: string,
fixedCliId: string | null // for resume: ccw cli detail ${fixedCliId}
}
// Appended to previousExecutionResults[] for context continuity
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!