Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Guru Review Change Request

ASecurity

Review whether a current change request is one independently deliverable unit through linked prerequisite evidence, an AI readiness gate, and five typed exits.

8 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/20/2026
research

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/20/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add castbox/guru-trellis --skill guru-review-change-request --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Guru Review Change Request?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Guru Review Change Request
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/castbox-guru-review-change-request-guru-trellis/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/castbox-guru-review-change-request-guru-trellis)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: guru-review-change-request
description: Review whether a current change request is one independently deliverable unit through linked prerequisite evidence, an AI readiness gate, and five typed exits.
---

# Guru Review Change Request

The current executing AI is this Skill's semantic owner. Read the complete
contract and perform its review yourself before authoring the current owner
result and calling record, check, and invoke. `owner_not_yet_executed` is an
internal state to continue this review, not a typed stop or a missing external
owner. Do not wait for another agent, agent ID, subagent evidence, or a
pre-existing owner result. Real missing authority or prerequisites still
follow this Skill's declared routes; runtime cannot supply your judgment.

Use this Skill after `guru-review-contract-wording:change_request:pass` and
before task workspace creation. Load
[references/contract.md](references/contract.md) before acting.

Reread the current target authority, then validate clarity and wording evidence. Review all
ten readiness dimensions, record findings and one scope conclusion, complete
the AI Review Gate, and call the recorder and checker only after the semantic
judgment exists. Return exactly one declared typed exit.

Before a discovered behavior scenario can affect the delivery unit, readiness
finding, requested test, clarification route, or blocker, form only current
candidate refs and live locators and invoke `guru-qualify-normal-scenario` with
`change_request_candidate_set`. Only the classified router may return eligible
candidates to this review. Rejected candidates remain non-actionable and never
become clarification. Mechanism revision returns here for remove/replace and
fresh qualification; blocked stops. This package never persists or rereads a
qualification result.

At the same candidate boundary, invoke `guru-qualify-solution-mechanism` with
`change_request_candidate_set` before accepting a proposed mechanism as a
delivery-unit, finding, test, or blocker basis. A mechanism revision removes
or replaces only that proposal and returns here for fresh qualification; it
does not enter scope clarification.

The recorder and checker validate only closed JSON shape, hashes, linkage,
freshness, fixed consumers, and objective exit invariants. They never generate
findings, select a delivery unit, decide readiness, or choose a route. Pre-task
and standalone execution is stdout-only. `ready` declares
`guru-create-task-workspace` as its consumer but does not create or persist a
task workspace. Fail closed when evidence is missing, stale, mismatched, or the
compatible Guru Team preset runtime is unavailable. This package is not
self-contained or portable.

All three commands use `--invocation -` and one JSON envelope containing
`schema_version=1.0`, `public_input`, the independent public `transition`,
`owner_context.change_request` (current source snapshot), and `owner_result`.
For record, `owner_result` is this Skill's completed AI review. Replace it with
record stdout for check; add the checker's `validation_receipt` only for invoke.
Record/check use `schemas/review-invocation.schema.json`; invoke uses the shared
semantic-owner invocation schema. No separate input locators or authored
`prerequisite_payloads` remain supported.

Run from the target repository root. The installed scripts are under
`.trellis/guru-team/skills/packages/guru-review-change-request/scripts/`,
not beside the platform discovery copy. Call `record-change-request-review.sh`,
`check-change-request-review.sh`, then `invoke.sh`, each with
`--root . --invocation - --json`. See the contract's Installed Authoring section.
The minimum authored `ai_review_gate` is `status`, `reviewer`, and `summary`.
Explicit dimensions, findings (including `[]`), scope conclusion and selected
exit remain AI-owned and required. Record derives both gate digests and the
findings count; never import private linkage or eval runtime to author them.

Use the actual `wording_current` producer transition for ready, original
`clarity_current` for a missing-wording reroute, or original `context_current`
for a missing-clarity reroute. Do not reconstruct upstream private results or
downgrade a later transition. Preserve the original public context needed for
re-entry in the call-local conversation; never fabricate missing hashes.
The runtime derives minimal prerequisites, validates the AI-selected route,
and emits the public handoff. Checker alone rereads the issue; invoke checks
the exact receipt and current envelope without live calls. It does not decide
readiness or expose the private review artifact.

Attribution

castboxcastbox
View sourceMore from castbox →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...

452202 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

805541 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...

452201 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →