Builds PE return models with entry/exit multiples, leverage analysis, and value creation attribution. Use when modeling PE returns, calculating IRR/MOIC, or attributing value creation drivers.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CaseMark/skills --skill modeling-portfolio-company-returns --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Modeling Portfolio Company Returns?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-modeling-portfolio-company-returns)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: modeling-portfolio-company-returns
language: en
description: Builds PE return models with entry/exit multiples, leverage analysis, and value creation attribution. Use when modeling PE returns, calculating IRR/MOIC, or attributing value creation drivers.
tags:
- modeling
- private-equity
metadata:
author: casemark
practice_areas:
- Private Equity
- Venture Capital
- Growth Equity
document_types:
- Financial Model
skill_modes:
- Modeling
- Forecasting
---
# Modeling Portfolio Company Returns
## When To Use
- Modeling projected or realized returns for a PE/growth equity portfolio company
- Calculating IRR, MOIC, and cash-on-cash returns across holding periods
- Attributing value creation to revenue growth, margin expansion, multiple expansion, and leverage paydown
- Comparing entry vs. exit economics for investment committee memos or LP reporting
- Stress-testing return sensitivity to purchase price, leverage, and exit assumptions
## Inputs To Gather
- **Entry transaction details**: purchase price (enterprise value), equity check size, entry EV/EBITDA multiple, transaction fees, and sources & uses
- **Capital structure at entry**: senior debt, subordinated debt, mezzanine, seller notes, rollover equity, management equity; interest rates and amortization schedules
- **Operating projections**: revenue, EBITDA, and free cash flow forecasts for the hold period (typically 3–7 years); capex, working capital, and tax assumptions
- **Exit assumptions**: target exit EV/EBITDA multiple, expected exit year, transaction costs at exit
- **Additional cash flows**: add-on acquisitions, dividend recaps, management fees, monitoring fees, or other interim distributions
- **Benchmark context**: comparable transaction multiples, sector median returns, or fund-level return targets for reasonableness checks
## Workflow
1. **Build the sources & uses table**
- Map total enterprise value, transaction fees, and financing fees on the uses side
- Lay out debt tranches, sponsor equity, rollover equity, and any co-invest on the sources side
- Confirm total sources equal total uses
2. **Construct the operating model**
- Project revenue, EBITDA, and unlevered free cash flow year-by-year through the hold period
- Apply working capital changes, capex, and tax assumptions to derive free cash flow available for debt service
- If add-on acquisitions are modeled, layer in incremental EBITDA and purchase price in the relevant year
3. **Model the debt schedule**
- For each tranche: opening balance, mandatory amortization, cash sweep (if applicable), interest expense, and closing balance
- Calculate total debt remaining at each projected exit year
- Track cumulative cash interest vs. PIK interest separately
4. **Calculate exit proceeds and equity waterfall**
- Apply exit multiple to projected EBITDA at each candidate exit year
- Deduct remaining net debt and transaction costs to arrive at equity value at exit
- Run equity proceeds through the waterfall: preferred return hurdles, GP catch-up, carried interest splits, and management option pool dilution where applicable
5. **Compute return metrics**
- **MOIC**: total equity distributions ÷ total equity invested
- **Gross IRR**: internal rate of return on equity cash flows (entry, interim distributions, exit)
- **Net IRR**: after management fees and carried interest [VERIFY fund-level fee structure]
- **Cash-on-cash**: cumulative cash returned ÷ equity invested (useful for dividend recap scenarios)
- **DPI / TVPI**: for fund-level context if aggregating across portfolio
6. **Perform value creation bridge**
- Decompose total equity return into four drivers:
- **Revenue/EBITDA growth**: EBITDA increase at constant entry multiple
- **Margin expansion**: incremental EBITDA from margin improvement at constant revenue
- **Multiple expansion**: delta between entry and exit multiples applied to exit EBITDA
- **Leverage effect (FCF and debt paydown)**: equity accretion from debt reduction over the hold period
- Present as a waterfall chart or bridge table summing to total equity gain
7. **Run sensitivity and scenario analysis**
- Two-way sensitivity tables on entry multiple vs. exit multiple and on EBITDA growth vs. leverage
- Downside, base, and upside scenarios with clearly labeled assumption sets
- Breakeven analysis: minimum exit multiple or EBITDA level needed to return 1.0x MOIC
## Output
- **Sources & uses table** with clearly labeled debt and equity components
- **Annual operating projections** with revenue, EBITDA, FCF, and debt balances
- **Return summary table**: MOIC, gross IRR, net IRR for each exit year (Year 3 through Year 7)
- **Value creation bridge**: quantified attribution across growth, margin, multiple, and leverage drivers
- **Sensitivity tables**: at minimum, entry/exit multiple grid and EBITDA growth/exit multiple grid
- **Key assumptions register**: every material assumption listed with source or [VERIFY] tag
## Quality Checks
- Sources & uses must balance to the penny — flag any rounding discrepancy
- IRR calculation must use actual cash flow dates (or mid-year convention if specified); confirm no circular references in debt sweep calculations
- Exit equity value must reconcile: exit EV minus net debt minus fees equals equity to sponsors
- Value creation bridge components must sum to total equity gain within ±0.1x MOIC rounding tolerance
- Confirm leverage ratios (Debt/EBITDA) stay within covenant levels at each projection year [VERIFY specific covenant thresholds from credit agreement]
- Cross-check modeled returns against sector benchmarks — flag if gross IRR exceeds 40% or falls below 10% as warranting additional assumption review
- Verify tax treatment of carried interest and management fee offsets align with fund LPA terms [VERIFY jurisdiction-specific tax rates and fund terms]
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!