Structures dividend recap analysis with leverage impact, credit agreement compliance, and return enhancement calculation. Use when modeling dividend recaps, evaluating interim distributions, or analyzing recapitalization options.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CaseMark/skills --skill modeling-dividend-recapitalizations --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Modeling Dividend Recapitalizations?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-modeling-dividend-recapitalizations)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: modeling-dividend-recapitalizations
language: en
description: Structures dividend recap analysis with leverage impact, credit agreement compliance, and return enhancement calculation. Use when modeling dividend recaps, evaluating interim distributions, or analyzing recapitalization options.
tags:
- modeling
- private-equity
- compliance
- credit
metadata:
author: casemark
practice_areas:
- Private Equity
- Leveraged Buyouts
- Growth Equity
document_types:
- Financial Model
skill_modes:
- Modeling
- Forecasting
---
# Modeling Dividend Recapitalizations
Structures dividend recap analysis with leverage impact, credit agreement compliance, and return enhancement calculation.
## When To Use
- Sponsor is considering an interim cash distribution funded by incremental debt prior to exit
- Evaluating whether a portfolio company can support additional leverage for a dividend recap
- Comparing a dividend recap against alternative liquidity events (partial sale, secondary, continuation fund)
- Stress-testing credit agreement headroom before approaching lenders for recap financing
- Quantifying IRR and MOIC enhancement from accelerating cash-on-cash returns
## Inputs To Gather
- **Current capital structure**: Senior debt outstanding (revolver drawn, term loan balances), subordinated/mezzanine layers, total equity invested at cost
- **Credit agreement terms**: Maximum leverage ratio (Total Debt / EBITDA), secured leverage cap, fixed charge coverage minimum, restricted payments basket language, pro forma incurrence test thresholds [VERIFY against actual credit agreement]
- **Company financials**: Trailing twelve-month (TTM) EBITDA, forward projections (2–3 years), capex requirements, working capital seasonality, cash on balance sheet
- **Proposed recap parameters**: Target dividend amount, proposed new debt instrument (term loan B, second lien, holdco PIK), indicative pricing (spread, OID, floor), expected tenor
- **Sponsor economics**: Equity check at entry, any prior distributions, current fund vintage and deployment pace, LP reporting considerations
## Workflow
1. **Establish pre-recap baseline**
- Build or refresh the operating model with TTM financials and management projections
- Calculate current leverage (Total Debt / EBITDA, Net Debt / EBITDA, Senior / EBITDA)
- Compute current free cash flow profile and debt service coverage ratio (DSCR)
2. **Size the dividend**
- Determine maximum incremental debt capacity under credit agreement covenants
- Apply the restricted payments basket test — identify whether the dividend falls within builder basket, general basket, or requires an incurrence-based exception [VERIFY covenant language for specific permitted payment carve-outs]
- Deduct transaction fees (arrangement fees, legal, advisory) from gross proceeds to derive net distributable amount
- Sense-check dividend size against market comps for similar recap transactions (typically 1.0×–2.5× incremental turns of leverage)
3. **Model pro forma capital structure**
- Layer in new debt tranche with proposed terms (rate, amortization, maturity, call protection)
- Recalculate blended cost of debt and weighted average maturity
- Produce pro forma leverage and coverage ratios at close and for each projected period
- Confirm no covenant breach at closing or within the projection horizon under the base case
4. **Assess credit impact**
- Run downside scenarios: revenue decline of 10–20%, margin compression of 100–300 bps, working capital blow-out
- Identify the EBITDA breakeven level at which covenant thresholds are breached
- Calculate cushion percentages on each financial covenant post-recap
- Evaluate rating agency implications if applicable (Moody's/S&P leverage thresholds for the sector) [VERIFY sector-specific rating benchmarks]
5. **Quantify return enhancement**
- Recalculate sponsor IRR and MOIC with the dividend included as an interim cash flow
- Compare gross and net IRR/MOIC pre- and post-recap across multiple exit timing scenarios (e.g., exit in Year 3, 4, 5)
- Compute DPI (distributions to paid-in) impact on fund-level metrics
- Show cash-on-cash return at the time of the dividend (dividend ÷ equity invested)
6. **Sensitivity and scenario analysis**
- Build a two-way sensitivity table: dividend size vs. exit EBITDA multiple
- Vary interest rate assumptions (fixed vs. floating, hedge cost) to stress debt service
- Model early repayment of recap debt from excess cash flow to show deleveraging trajectory
- Present bear/base/bull return profiles with and without the recap
## Output
- **Executive summary**: One-page overview of proposed recap — dividend amount, pro forma leverage, covenant headroom, and IRR/MOIC enhancement
- **Pro forma capitalization table**: Pre- and post-recap side-by-side with all debt tranches, rates, maturities, and total equity value
- **Covenant compliance matrix**: Each financial covenant tested at close and through the projection period with cushion percentages
- **Returns waterfall**: Sponsor IRR and MOIC with and without recap, across exit timing scenarios
- **Sensitivity tables**: Dividend size vs. leverage, EBITDA decline vs. covenant breach, exit multiple vs. IRR
- **Risk flags**: Identified risks including refinancing exposure, floating rate sensitivity, and covenant tightness
## Quality Checks
- Pro forma leverage ratios tie exactly to the credit agreement definitions (confirm EBITDA add-backs, pro forma adjustments match lender methodology) [VERIFY]
- Restricted payments test uses the correct basket and references the operative credit agreement section
- IRR calculations use actual cash flow dates — not period-end approximations
- All incremental debt terms reflect current market conditions for the company's credit profile
- Downside scenarios are genuinely stressful, not cosmetic — test at least a 15% EBITDA decline
- Dividend amount plus fees plus minimum cash does not exceed gross debt proceeds
- Model cross-checks: ending cash balance ties to cash flow statement, debt schedule ties to balance sheet, interest expense ties to average balances × applicable rates
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!