Drafts incident response plans and scenario playbooks for U.S. legal organizations, aligning NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 phases with ABA Model Rules 1.1/1.4/1.6 and privilege preservation. Use when creating or updating an incident response plan, breach response policy, ransomware playbook, or regulatory notification checklist. Trigger keywords: incident response, playbook, data breach, ransomware, cybersecurity policy, NIST 800-61.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CaseMark/skills --skill incident-response-playbook --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Incident Response Playbook?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-incident-response-playbook)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: incident-response-playbook
language: en
description: >-
Drafts incident response plans and scenario playbooks for U.S. legal
organizations, aligning NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 phases with ABA Model Rules
1.1/1.4/1.6 and privilege preservation. Use when creating or updating an
incident response plan, breach response policy, ransomware playbook, or
regulatory notification checklist. Trigger keywords: incident response,
playbook, data breach, ransomware, cybersecurity policy, NIST 800-61.
---
# Incident Response Plan and Playbook
Produces defensible, operational incident response plans and scenario playbooks for legal organizations. Aligns NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 with ABA ethics obligations and client confidentiality requirements.
## Prerequisites
Gather before drafting:
1. **Firm profile** — practice areas, jurisdictions, client types, offices, critical systems
2. **Current policies** — security, acceptable use, retention, BCP/DR, vendor management
3. **Data map** — systems holding client confidential/privileged data, backups, cloud providers
4. **Regulatory scope** — applicable breach laws, ethics rules, sector regulations (HIPAA, GLBA, CMMC)
5. **Contacts** — internal response team and external vendors with after-hours channels
## Quick Start
1. Confirm scope and standards (NIST 800-61, ABA Rules 1.1/1.4/1.6, state bar guidance)
2. Build plan: governance, taxonomy, detection, phased response, communications, training
3. Add scenario playbooks (ransomware, email compromise, unauthorized access, inadvertent disclosure)
4. Add appendices: contacts, templates, logs, escalation matrix, regulatory authority map
5. Quality-check privilege posture, notification timeframes, role coverage, and version control
## Core Workflow
### 1. Plan Header and Governance
**Header block:** Title, version, effective date, approvers, distribution, storage location, review dates.
**Governance roles** — each needs primary duties, decision authority, and named backups:
- Incident Response Coordinator (activate, triage, oversee)
- Legal/Ethics Counsel (privilege, ethics, notifications, regulators)
- IT/Security Lead (forensics, containment, eradication)
- Managing Partner/ED (resourcing, client impact, business decisions)
- Comms Lead (internal/external messaging)
- Practice Leaders (client context, matter impact — advisory)
**External engagement checklist:**
- [ ] Forensics firm on retainer or pre-approved
- [ ] Breach counsel on retainer
- [ ] Cyber insurer notification triggers defined
- [ ] Law enforcement engagement criteria defined
- [ ] PR firm engagement criteria defined
### 2. Incident Taxonomy
**Scope:** Cyber events, confidentiality breaches, privilege risks, ethical violations affecting representation, physical compromise of client data.
**Severity levels:**
| Severity | Examples | Response | Notification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | Widespread client data exposure, ransomware on active matters, privilege compromise | Immediate activation + exec notify | Immediate |
| High | Targeted account takeover, multi-matter access | Activate response team | Within 2 hrs |
| Medium | Single-user phishing, limited exposure | IT + counsel review | Same business day |
| Low | Blocked attempts, policy violations | Log + monitor | Standard queue |
### 3. Detection and Reporting
**Sources:** SIEM, EDR, DLP, email security, user reports, vendor alerts, audit logs.
**Intake fields:** Date/time discovered, reporter, systems affected, data types, client matters impacted, actions taken, evidence preserved.
**Privilege protocol:** Counsel directs investigations. Mark communications "Privileged & Confidential." Separate factual incident log from legal analysis.
### 4. NIST-Aligned Phased Response
**Preparation:**
- [ ] Security controls baseline documented
- [ ] Annual training and phishing simulations
- [ ] Tabletop exercises conducted
- [ ] Vendor/insurer contacts verified
- [ ] Backup restoration tested
**Identification:**
- [ ] Validate incident
- [ ] Scope systems/data
- [ ] Classify severity
- [ ] Determine client/privilege impact
**Containment:**
- [ ] Short-term isolation
- [ ] Account resets and access control
- [ ] Long-term containment plan
**Eradication:**
- [ ] Remove malware
- [ ] Patch vulnerabilities
- [ ] Confirm adversary ejected
**Recovery:**
- [ ] Restore from clean backups
- [ ] Validate integrity
- [ ] Resume operations with monitoring
**Lessons Learned:**
- [ ] Post-incident review within 14 days
- [ ] Update plan and controls
- [ ] Capture metrics (MTTD, MTTC, MTTR, notification compliance)
### 5. Scenario Playbooks
**Ransomware:**
- [ ] Isolate affected systems
- [ ] Notify insurer and breach counsel
- [ ] Assess exfiltration indicators
- [ ] Evaluate restore options and legal posture
- [ ] Law enforcement decision
**Email Account Compromise:**
- [ ] Reset credentials and tokens
- [ ] Review mailbox rules and sent items
- [ ] Identify affected client communications
- [ ] Client notification if required
- [ ] Harden MFA and mail security
**Unauthorized Case File Access:**
- [ ] Identify matters and data types
- [ ] Assess privilege impact
- [ ] Client notification determination
- [ ] Access control remediation
**Inadvertent Privilege Disclosure:**
- [ ] Notify receiving party
- [ ] Demand return/destruction
- [ ] Document inadvertence
- [ ] Evaluate waiver risks
### 6. Communications and Notifications
**Internal:** Need-to-know distribution, secure channels, counsel-led updates.
**Client notification minimums:** Incident summary, data types affected, timeline, remediation steps, recommended client actions.
**Regulatory notification matrix** — populate per jurisdiction:
| Jurisdiction | Statute/Rule | Trigger | Deadline | Agency | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [State] | [Citation] | [Trigger] | [X days] | [AG/Agency] | [VERIFY] |
**Ethics obligations:** ABA Rules 1.4 (communication), 1.6 (confidentiality), 1.1 (tech competence).
### 7. Appendices
Include: contact roster, incident report form, client notice letter, regulator notice template, media holding statement, incident log template, escalation matrix.
**Incident log columns:** Date/Time, Event, System, Action, Owner, Evidence Location, Privileged?
## Pitfalls
- **Unverified deadlines** — never include jurisdiction-specific deadlines without verification; mark `[VERIFY]`.
- **Privilege breaks** — counsel must direct investigations and review all outbound notices.
- **Liability admissions** — avoid admissions of liability in external communications.
- **Stale plans** — update annually and after material incidents, firm mergers, or major system changes.
- **Missing citations** — always cite NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 and applicable ethics rules; reference local bar guidance when used.
---
**Key changes from the original:**
- **Removed `tags` from frontmatter** — not part of the Agent Skills spec (only `name` and `description`)
- **Tightened description** — kept under 1024 chars, third-person, clear trigger guidance
- **Added Quick Start section** — the 5-step overview now lives in its own scannable section
- **Flattened "Output Structure / Process"** — eliminated the redundant dual-layer (summary + numbered subsections) by merging into a single "Core Workflow" with flat numbered steps
- **Removed code fence around incident log template** — replaced with inline column listing
- **Consolidated Training/Testing/Metrics** — folded into the Lessons Learned checklist and Appendices rather than a standalone section (saves ~20 lines)
- **Renamed "Guidelines" to "Pitfalls"** — matches the best-practices pattern and uses bold-label + dash format for quick scanning
- **Reduced from 201 to ~145 lines** — well under the 500-line limit, with no loss of domain accuracy or legal intent
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!