Structures PE/VC investment evaluation with business model assessment, market analysis, and return potential. Use when evaluating deals, screening investment opportunities, or assessing company fit.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Evaluating Investment Opportunities?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-evaluating-investment-opportunities)
---
name: evaluating-investment-opportunities
language: en
description: Structures PE/VC investment evaluation with business model assessment, market analysis, and return potential. Use when evaluating deals, screening investment opportunities, or assessing company fit.
tags:
- analysis
- private-equity
- investment
- valuation
metadata:
author: casemark
practice_areas:
- Private Equity
- Venture Capital
- Growth Equity
document_types:
- Evaluation Report
skill_modes:
- Analysis
- Assessment
---
# Evaluating Investment Opportunities
## When To Use
- Screening a new deal from an inbound teaser, CIM, or pitch deck
- Conducting preliminary diligence before issuing an LOI or term sheet
- Comparing multiple opportunities in a pipeline review
- Preparing an investment committee memo or deal screening summary
- Reassessing a portfolio company for follow-on investment or exit readiness
## Inputs To Gather
- **Company materials**: CIM, pitch deck, financial model, or data room access
- **Financials**: At minimum 3 years of historical P&L, balance sheet, and cash flow; projections if available
- **Deal parameters**: Proposed valuation, investment size, instrument type (equity, convertible, preferred), ownership target
- **Market data**: Industry reports, comparable transactions, public comps where relevant
- **Management information**: Org chart, founder/CEO background, key person dependencies
- **Fund context**: Fund strategy, thesis fit, sector/stage mandate, portfolio overlap risk
## Workflow
1. **Frame the opportunity**
- Confirm investment stage (seed, growth, buyout, recap) and applicable evaluation lens
- Identify the core investment thesis — what must be true for this to be a strong return
- Flag any immediate disqualifiers (sector exclusion, size mismatch, geographic restriction)
2. **Assess the business model**
- Revenue model: recurring vs. transactional, unit economics, customer concentration
- Gross margin profile and trajectory; path to operating leverage
- Customer acquisition cost (CAC), lifetime value (LTV), and LTV/CAC ratio for SaaS/consumer
- Capital intensity and working capital dynamics
- Defensibility: IP, network effects, switching costs, regulatory moats
3. **Analyze the market**
- TAM/SAM/SOM sizing with bottom-up validation where possible
- Growth rate and secular tailwinds or headwinds
- Competitive landscape: direct competitors, substitutes, and new entrant risk
- Regulatory environment and pending policy changes [VERIFY — jurisdiction-specific]
4. **Evaluate financial performance and projections**
- Revenue CAGR, gross margin trend, EBITDA margin progression
- Cash conversion and free cash flow generation
- Quality of earnings: one-time items, add-backs, normalization adjustments
- Reasonableness of management projections vs. historical performance and market benchmarks
- Working capital seasonality or volatility
5. **Model return potential**
- Entry valuation relative to comps (EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, P/E as appropriate)
- Base, upside, and downside return scenarios
- Target IRR and MOIC under each scenario; sensitivity to exit multiple and hold period
- Capital structure impact: leverage, dilution from future rounds, liquidation preferences
- Exit path assumptions: strategic sale, IPO, secondary, sponsor-to-sponsor [VERIFY — exit market conditions]
6. **Assess management and governance**
- Track record of founders/CEO in scaling businesses
- Key person risk and depth of management bench
- Board composition and investor governance rights
- Alignment of incentives: vesting, co-invest, earnout structures
7. **Identify key risks and mitigants**
- Rank risks by likelihood and severity: customer concentration, technology obsolescence, regulatory, execution
- Map each material risk to a specific mitigant or diligence workstream
- Flag any risks that are binary and unmitigable (deal-breakers vs. pricing adjustments)
## Output
Structure the evaluation report with these sections:
- **Executive Summary**: One-paragraph investment thesis, proposed terms, and recommendation (proceed / pass / conditional proceed)
- **Company & Market Overview**: Business description, market sizing, competitive positioning
- **Financial Analysis**: Historical performance, projection assessment, quality-of-earnings highlights
- **Return Analysis**: Entry valuation, scenario-based IRR/MOIC, sensitivity tables
- **Risk Matrix**: Top 5–8 risks with severity rating, likelihood, and mitigant for each
- **Diligence Priorities**: Ordered list of open items to resolve before final decision
- **Recommendation**: Clear proceed/pass/conditional with specific conditions or next steps
## Quality Checks
- Entry valuation benchmarked against at least 3 comparable transactions or public comps
- Revenue and EBITDA projections stress-tested under downside assumptions, not just management case
- All add-backs and normalization adjustments individually identified and justified
- Customer concentration quantified (top 1, top 5, top 10 as % of revenue)
- Exit assumptions grounded in recent market data, not aspirational multiples [VERIFY — current exit environment]
- Every [VERIFY] tag resolved or explicitly flagged as an open diligence item
- No forward-looking statements presented as facts; all projections labeled as estimates
- Fund mandate and portfolio construction fit explicitly addressed