Creates structured credit memos with borrower analysis, risk assessment, and recommendation justification. Use when writing credit memos, documenting credit decisions, or presenting credit recommendations.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CaseMark/skills --skill drafting-credit-memos --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Drafting Credit Memos?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-drafting-credit-memos)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: drafting-credit-memos
language: en
description: Creates structured credit memos with borrower analysis, risk assessment, and recommendation justification. Use when writing credit memos, documenting credit decisions, or presenting credit recommendations.
tags:
- drafting
- fixed-income
- risk
- credit
metadata:
author: casemark
practice_areas:
- Fixed Income
- Credit Research
- Bond Trading
document_types:
- Draft Document
skill_modes:
- Drafting
---
# Drafting Credit Memos
## When To Use
- Recommending a new bond purchase, loan participation, or credit facility for a portfolio or credit committee
- Documenting the rationale for increasing, reducing, or maintaining an existing credit exposure
- Presenting a credit opinion on a new issuer or counterparty for internal approval
- Refreshing an annual or semi-annual credit review on a held position
- Supporting a rating change recommendation (upgrade, downgrade, or watch placement)
## Inputs To Gather
- **Issuer/borrower identity**: Legal name, ticker, CUSIP/ISIN, sector classification (GICS or internal taxonomy)
- **Financial statements**: Minimum three years of audited financials plus latest interim period; confirm GAAP vs. IFRS basis
- **Capital structure detail**: Debt schedule with maturities, coupon rates, seniority, covenants, and guarantor structure
- **Market data**: Current spread levels (OAS, Z-spread, or CDS), comparable issuer spreads, recent price action
- **Rating agency views**: Moody's/S&P/Fitch ratings, outlooks, and most recent rating action commentary
- **Industry context**: Sector fundamentals, competitive positioning, key risk drivers (commodity exposure, regulatory, cyclicality)
- **Transaction specifics** (if new issue): Proposed terms, use of proceeds, pricing guidance, syndicate structure
- **Portfolio context**: Current exposure, concentration limits, mandate guidelines, and any investment policy constraints [VERIFY]
## Workflow
1. **Confirm scope and recommendation direction**
- Clarify whether memo is for new investment, annual review, or event-driven reassessment
- Identify the target audience (credit committee, portfolio manager, trading desk)
- Determine recommendation type: Buy / Hold / Sell / Avoid, with size and tenor guidance
2. **Build the issuer profile**
- Summarize business description: revenue mix, geographic footprint, market position
- Identify the 3-5 key credit drivers (e.g., leverage trajectory, margin stability, asset quality, liquidity, management track record)
- Note ownership structure and any parent/subsidiary support or structural subordination
3. **Conduct financial analysis**
- Compute and trend core credit metrics: Debt/EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBITDA/Interest), FFO/Debt, FCF generation
- Adjust for off-balance-sheet obligations, operating leases (if pre-IFRS 16 comparisons needed), and non-recurring items — flag each adjustment explicitly
- Stress-test metrics under a downside scenario (revenue decline of X%, margin compression of Y bps) and identify the break-even deterioration level
- Compare metrics against rating agency medians for the assigned rating category [VERIFY agency-specific methodology]
4. **Assess capital structure and recovery**
- Map the priority-of-claims waterfall: secured → senior unsecured → subordinated → equity
- Estimate recovery prospects by tranche using enterprise value or asset-based approach
- Flag covenant protections or weaknesses (incurrence vs. maintenance tests, restricted payments baskets, change-of-control provisions)
5. **Evaluate relative value**
- Compare spread to sector peers at similar rating, maturity, and seniority
- Assess whether current spread compensates for identified risks vs. comparables
- Note any technical factors: index eligibility, supply/demand dynamics, event catalysts
6. **Formulate recommendation**
- State recommendation clearly: action (Buy/Hold/Sell), notional size, target spread or price, and investment horizon
- Summarize supporting thesis in 2-3 sentences
- List key risks to the recommendation and monitoring triggers (e.g., leverage exceeding 4.5x, downgrade to below-IG)
7. **Draft the memo**
- Use the output structure below
- Write in direct, declarative style — lead each section with the conclusion, then support with data
- Mark any unverified data points with [VERIFY]
## Output
Structure the credit memo with these sections:
1. **Executive Summary** — Recommendation, issuer name, rating, key metric snapshot, and 2-3 sentence thesis
2. **Issuer Overview** — Business description, revenue breakdown, competitive position, ownership
3. **Industry & Macro Context** — Sector trends, regulatory environment, cyclical positioning
4. **Financial Analysis** — Historical and projected metrics table, adjustment notes, stress scenario results
5. **Capital Structure & Recovery** — Debt maturity profile, priority waterfall, covenant summary
6. **Relative Value** — Spread comparison table vs. peers, technical factors
7. **Risk Factors** — Ranked list of 3-5 material risks with severity assessment
8. **Recommendation & Monitoring** — Actionable conclusion, position sizing rationale, triggers for review
9. **Appendix** — Detailed financial tables, source list, rating history
## Quality Checks
- All credit metrics tie back to sourced financials; no computed ratio is left without its inputs shown
- Recommendation is internally consistent — risk factors do not contradict the thesis without explicit acknowledgment
- Covenant analysis references actual indenture or credit agreement language, not summaries [VERIFY document availability]
- Peer comparison uses issuers of genuinely comparable credit profile (same sector, similar rating band, comparable maturity)
- Stress scenario assumptions are stated and plausible, not arbitrary round-number shocks
- Spread and pricing data carry timestamps — stale data is flagged
- Portfolio limit compliance is confirmed against current mandate or IPS guidelines [VERIFY specific fund constraints]
- No rating agency content is reproduced verbatim beyond fair-use thresholds; paraphrase and cite
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!