Scan code changes for security vulnerabilities using Bug Hunter-native artifacts and STRIDE context. Use whenever the user asks for PR security review, commit-diff scanning, staged-change security checks, branch-comparison security review, or pre-merge security analysis of changed code.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CarlosCaPe/octorato --skill commit-security-scan --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Commit Security Scan?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/carloscape-commit-security-scan)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: commit-security-scan
description: Scan code changes for security vulnerabilities using Bug Hunter-native artifacts and STRIDE context. Use whenever the user asks for PR security review, commit-diff scanning, staged-change security checks, branch-comparison security review, or pre-merge security analysis of changed code.
---
# Commit Security Scan
This is a bundled local Bug Hunter companion skill. It is portable and self-contained: use `.bug-hunter/*` artifacts, never `.factory/*` paths.
## Purpose
Review *changed code* for security issues only. This skill is optimized for:
- PR review
- staged diff review
- branch diff review
- commit / commit-range security scanning
## Inputs
Resolve the scan scope from the user request:
- PR review → use `scripts/pr-scope.cjs`
- staged review → use `git diff --cached --name-only`
- branch diff → use `git diff --name-only <base>...<head>`
- commit range → use `git diff --name-only <base>..<head>`
## Workflow
1. Ensure threat-model context exists.
- Preferred artifacts:
- `.bug-hunter/threat-model.md`
- `.bug-hunter/security-config.json`
- If missing, run the bundled `threat-model-generation` skill first.
2. Resolve the changed-file scope.
3. Read the full contents of the changed source files, not just the patch.
4. Focus on STRIDE-oriented issues in changed code:
- Spoofing: auth/session/token mistakes
- Tampering: SQLi, XSS, path traversal, command injection, mass assignment
- Repudiation: security-sensitive actions with no auditability
- Information Disclosure: IDOR, secret exposure, verbose errors
- DoS: unbounded input, missing limits, expensive regex/queries
- Elevation of Privilege: missing authorization, role bypass, privilege escalation
5. Reuse Bug Hunter-native security conventions:
- findings should be compatible with `.bug-hunter/findings.json`
- use STRIDE + CWE labels
- include confidence scores
6. If the user wants only a focused security diff review, stop after the findings report.
If the user wants deeper validation, hand off to the bundled `vulnerability-validation` skill.
## Output
Preferred outputs:
- `.bug-hunter/findings.json` when integrating with the main Bug Hunter pipeline
- `.bug-hunter/report.md` as a rendered companion if needed
## Notes
- This skill is intentionally diff-scoped; it does not replace full-repository audits.
- Use it as the lightweight security fast-path before invoking the broader `security-review` flow.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!