Run the user's semester from a machine-readable ledger built out of their syllabi. Use when they mention a class, an assignment, an exam, a deadline, a professor, a reading, a grade, attendance, or a syllabus; when they ask what is due, what to work on, or whether they can miss a class; when they hand over a syllabus PDF; and before helping with any graded work, because each course sets its own rules about what help is allowed.
Scanned 9/22/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add calebnewtonusc/Chewbacca --skill coursework --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Coursework?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/calebnewtonusc-coursework)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: coursework
description: Run the user's semester from a machine-readable ledger built out of their syllabi. Use when they mention a class, an assignment, an exam, a deadline, a professor, a reading, a grade, attendance, or a syllabus; when they ask what is due, what to work on, or whether they can miss a class; when they hand over a syllabus PDF; and before helping with any graded work, because each course sets its own rules about what help is allowed.
requires: [coursework]
---
# Coursework
A syllabus is a contract that states, in writing, every date the student will be
judged on, exactly how much an absence costs, and precisely what help is
permitted. Almost nobody reads it twice. The whole point of this skill is to read
it once, carefully, into a ledger, and then answer from the ledger forever.
Two failure modes to design against, both worse than being slow:
1. **Inventing a date.** A confidently wrong deadline is more damaging than "I
do not know", because the user stops checking. Every date in the ledger
carries a `source` field naming the page it came from. If you cannot cite it,
it does not go in.
2. **Helping in a way the course forbids.** Three courses in one semester can
have three different AI policies: banned outright, allowed with mandatory
prompt disclosure, allowed for ideation but not for the submitted artifact.
Getting this wrong is an academic integrity referral, not a style problem.
## The ledger
Lives in `$COURSEWORK_DIR` (default `~/coursework`), plain YAML in git:
```
semester.yml term dates, drop deadlines, breaks
courses/*.yml one file per course
syllabi/ the source PDFs, kept so any claim can be re-checked
```
It is read with the `coursework` CLI, which ships with this kit:
```bash
coursework due --days 14 # what is due, soonest first
coursework today # today's classes and today's deadlines
coursework week # the days ahead, one block each
coursework attendance # absences used against the budget
coursework grade BISC --target 90
coursework policy WRIT ai # what this course allows
coursework ics --out ~/Desktop/semester.ics
coursework check # validate, loudly
```
**Run the CLI instead of reading the YAML by hand.** It is deterministic, costs
no tokens to think through, and it will not misread a date the way a skim will.
Add `--json` when you need the values rather than the display.
**The CLI never writes.** You and the user edit the ledger; the tool only reads
it. That split is deliberate: deadlines are facts copied from a document, and a
program that rewrites them can quietly disagree with the source.
## Before helping with anything graded
Run this first, every time, no exceptions:
```bash
coursework policy <course> ai
```
Then say what it returns, in one line, before doing the work. Not as a lecture:
as a fact the user needs in order to decide.
- **Banned:** do not draft, outline, or generate any part of the submitted
artifact. Everything else is still available: explain the concept, quiz them,
find where their reasoning broke, build a study plan, read their draft back to
them and point at what is unclear. Say plainly which side of the line you are
on.
- **Disclosure required:** help as asked, then write the disclosure paragraph
with them: which tool, how it was used, the actual prompts. Leaving it off is
the violation, not the use.
- **Ideation only:** brainstorm and pressure-test freely, hand over nothing that
could be pasted in as the deliverable.
- **Unknown:** treat it as banned and tell them to ask the instructor. An
unrecorded policy is not a permissive one.
This is also the user's own standard, not just the school's. The frustration to
avoid is AI doing the work instead of them learning it. Optimize for the version
of them that walks into the exam knowing the material.
## Reading a syllabus into the ledger
**If the school runs Blackboard Ultra, do not start from a PDF.** `course-ingest`
reads every enrolled course, its gradebook with exact due timestamps, its
document bodies and its syllabus file, in one pass, and writes the deadlines to
Apple Calendar. See `references/lms-ingest.md`.
Full procedure, including what to do about the fields syllabi routinely omit:
`references/syllabus-intake.md`. Read it before ingesting a syllabus, not after.
The short version: read the whole PDF, never a skim of the first page. Extract
meetings, instructor, every dated deliverable, the grading breakdown, the
attendance arithmetic, the AI policy verbatim, and the late-work schedule. Write
one `courses/<code>.yml`. Run `coursework check`. Report what the syllabus did
not say, because that list is the set of questions to ask in class.
## The textbook
A course textbook is half a million words and does not belong in a session.
`textbook` searches an ingested one and returns passages, not chapters:
```bash
textbook books # what is ingested
textbook toc # chapters, page spans, lengths
textbook search "participant observation" # ranked passages, each with a page
textbook search "kula" --chapter 6 # one chapter
textbook glossary reciprocity # defined terms only
```
Every hit carries the page printed in the book. **Quote the page, not the PDF
page**, for the same reason every deadline carries a `source`: a claim the user
cannot look up is one they have to take on faith, and they will stop checking.
Reading the source PDF instead is the failure to avoid. It burns the session on
one chapter and returns a worse answer than a search that cost four hundred
words.
To ingest a new one, `~/Chewbacca/texts/ingest/ingest.py scan <pdf>` prints the
chapter plan and writes nothing. Read the plan before `apply` files 500 pages
under the wrong headings.
## Answering questions about the semester
- **"What's due?"** `coursework due`. Do not editorialize the list into a plan
unless asked; the list is usually the answer.
- **"What should I work on?"** Rank by deadline distance times weight, then say
the one thing to start now. Not a schedule for the whole week: the next block.
- **"Can I skip Wednesday?"** `coursework attendance <course>` and quote the
real cost. In a labor-contract course the third absence can be a full grade
step, and a doctor's note may not excuse it. This is arithmetic, so do the
arithmetic instead of offering encouragement.
- **"How am I doing?"** `coursework grade`. For a contract-graded course the CLI
refuses to produce a number and points at the policy, which is correct: read
`references/grading-models.md` and count infractions against the step table
instead of averaging scores that do not exist.
- **"I'm behind."** Triage, do not motivate. What is unrecoverable (a missed exam
with no makeup), what is cheap to save (a late ancillary assignment worth one
step), what is already sunk. Then one action.
## Keeping it true
The ledger goes stale in exactly three ways, and all three are silent:
- **A date moves in class** and the PDF still says the old one. When the user
mentions a change, update the ledger in the same turn and set `source` to
"announced in class YYYY-MM-DD".
- **Work gets done** and stays marked `todo`, so `due` keeps shouting about it.
Flip `status: done` as things land. **Before calling anything overdue, check
the LMS rather than asking.** Most systems will say, per student, whether a
thing was submitted and exactly when; `references/lms-ingest.md` has the D2L
endpoint. Asking surfaces what they happen to remember, which is the big
assignment, not the small one sitting on the same line of the syllabus.
- **An absence happens** and `absences.used` never moves. Increment it when the
user says they missed a class. This is the field that decides a grade step and
nobody remembers it in November.
Run `coursework check` at the start of any session that touches school. It
reports missing AI policies, deadlines with no source, past-due items still open,
and grading weights that do not sum to 100.
## References
| File | Read when |
| ------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `references/syllabus-intake.md` | Ingesting a syllabus into the ledger |
| `references/grading-models.md` | Weighted, points-based, or labor-contract grading math |
| `references/integrity.md` | Deciding what help a course actually permits, and how to disclose it |
| `references/lms-ingest.md` | Reading the term straight out of the LMS (Blackboard Ultra, D2L Brightspace), and checking what was actually submitted |
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!