Shared team board: claim a work item before starting, hand it over, finish it. The claim is a git-ref lock, so two people cannot take the same item.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add byerlikaya/claude-starter-kit --skill teamboard --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Teamboard?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/byerlikaya-teamboard)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: teamboard
description: |
Shared team board: claim a work item before starting, hand it over, finish it. The claim is a git-ref lock,
so two people cannot take the same item.
---
# Team Board (shared claims + shared item memory)
<!-- routing-eval reads this line; it lives in the BODY so the always-on skill LISTING stays inside
Claude Code's budget (1% of the context window) — an overflowing listing gets descriptions
truncated or dropped, which strips the very keywords a match depends on. -->
Trigger phrases: "team board", "who is working on", "claim", "take this item", "pick up a task", "sprint item", "release the item", "hand the item over", "is anyone on", "board", "of us are working", "stepping on each other", "who is doing what", "who else is working"
## The problem this closes
Every teammate runs the kit **locally**. `docs/PLAN.md` and `docs/SESSION_STATE.md` are gitignored, so the fact
that Ali started item #1 two hours ago exists nowhere the other sessions can see. Two people start the same item;
a blocked item gets picked up before its dependency lands; whoever inherits half-finished work rebuilds the
context from scratch. The board makes those three facts shared.
## The engine (all commands go through it)
`bash .claude/hooks/board.sh <cmd>` — `status` · `show <id>` · `claim <id>` · `done <id> [note]` ·
`drop <id> <note>` · `note <id> <text>` · `add <id> <title> [deps] [external]` · `init` · `sync`.
Never hand-edit the board; every write must go through the engine or it loses its atomicity.
## Why a claim is a real lock, not a convention
The board lives on a git ref (`refs/csk/board`), not in the worktree. A claim is a commit pushed to that ref, and
`git push` is fast-forward-only: when two people claim the same item from the same base, **one push is rejected**
and that session re-reads the board and refuses. This is an atomic compare-and-swap with no server, no token and
no daemon. The engine builds its commits with git plumbing, so claiming **never touches your working tree,
index, branch or stash** — you can claim mid-feature with dirty files.
`init` first probes whether the server accepts a custom ref namespace; if it does not, it falls back to the
orphan branch `refs/heads/csk-board`, which every server accepts and which enforces the same rule. Do not merge
that branch into code.
## Off by default; on when a team asks for it
A repo that never ran `init` **has no board and no gates** — no claim, no commit gate, no edit gate, nothing at
session start. Solo work is unchanged, and so is every project that installed the kit before this existed. Do not
create a board because a repo merely has more than one contributor; create one when the user says the team keeps
colliding. Three levels, and the user picks:
| | Effect |
|---|---|
| no board (default) | nothing at all |
| `require_item: referenced` in the board's `config` | claims and the shared memory, but no gate: a commit is only checked when it names an item |
| `require_item: all` (what `init` writes) | claim before you edit, and every commit names an item or `[chore]` |
Already have a board and want it out of the way? `/board-csk off` (add `--global` for every repo) releases **all
three** gates and leaves the board itself intact; `/board-csk on` restores it. `CSK_NO_BOARD=1` does the same for
one session. A board with no remote is fine too — you get the item list, the dependency order and the gates,
just nothing shared.
## Setting it up — one person, one command; everybody else configures nothing
- **Whoever starts it:** `/board-csk init`, then add the items. It probes what the server accepts, creates the
board on the code repo's own `origin`, and that is the whole setup — no account, no token, no service.
- **A separate board repository:** `/board-csk init --remote <url>` (or an existing remote's name). Use it when
the board is shared across several repos, or when people who must claim work cannot push to the code repo. It
gets its own `csk-board` remote and never touches `origin`.
- **Everyone else: nothing.** They clone as usual. Session start fetches the board on its own (detached), the
ref namespace is auto-detected including the orphan-branch fallback, and `/board-csk` fetches on the spot if
the background refresh has not landed yet. Never tell a teammate to run `init` — a second `init` is how a team
ends up with two boards.
## The rules
1. **Claim before you touch code.** `claim <id>` fails if someone else holds it, if it is done, or if a
dependency is unfinished — with the reason and the list of what *is* claimable. Do not argue with a refusal;
take a free item.
2. **Two gates, not one, and the early one is the point.** The first file edit is refused while you hold no item
(`guard-write.sh`) — unclaimed work is caught at minute one, not at commit time after an afternoon of it. The
commit then has to carry `[#<id>]` for an item you hold and that is `in_progress`, or `[chore]` for work
belonging to no item. In a repo with no board neither gate exists. `CSK_NO_BOARD=1` disables both for a
session; say so out loud if you set it.
3. **Never release silently.** `drop` REQUIRES a handover note, because the whole cost of a handover is the
context the next person does not have: where exactly it stands, which files, and *why* the rejected approach
was rejected. `done` takes a completion note (what shipped, commit/PR).
4. **Never steal a stale claim.** A claim with no heartbeat for `stale_hours` (default 8) is reported as STALE.
Stale means *ask the owner*, not *take it*. Surface it to the user and let them decide.
5. **Read before you plan.** At session start the board summary is injected automatically. Before proposing what
to work on, run `status` — recommending an item somebody already holds is the failure this exists to prevent.
## Redaction — the board is shared
Everything written here is pushed to a remote the whole team reads. `handoff`'s `<private>…</private>` rule
applies unchanged: strip secrets, tokens, credentials and personal notes, leave `[redacted]`, and point at
*where* a value lives (env var, secret manager, the person to ask) rather than the value.
## Filling the board
Items come from either direction, and both end at `add`:
- **From a plan:** `planner-csk` + `spec-planning` produce `docs/PLAN.md` with measurable acceptance criteria and
a dependency order; each task becomes one `add <id> <title> <deps>`. Keep the plan's dependency edges — they
are what makes `claim` able to refuse blocked work.
- **By hand:** the user dictates the items.
## Tracker link (honest boundary)
Teams use Jira, Trello, Linear, GitHub Issues or nothing, so the kit **binds to none of them**. An item carries an
optional `external:` field, which is a link and nothing more — no sync, no import, no write-back. A team that
wants two-way sync writes an executable `.csk/board-adapter.sh` answering two verbs: `import` (emit
`<id>|<title>|<deps>|<external>` lines to be fed to `add`) and `export <id> <status>` (push the state outward).
The kit ships no adapter; do not claim integration the kit does not have.
## When the remote is unreachable
Claims stay local and are labelled `UNSHARED` — meaning **the team cannot see them**, so the lock is not in force.
Say that plainly rather than reporting success, and re-run `sync` once the network is back.
## DoD
- Work started only on an item held by this user; the board shows it `in_progress`.
- An item left for any reason carries a handover note a stranger could resume from.
- `done` recorded with what shipped, and the dependents it unblocked named to the user.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!