Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Delegate Codex

ASecurity

Owns codex usage end to end, dispatch through the supervised delegate script, the codex prompt contract, model and effort choice, and session resume. Use as a write delegated sub-agent when work is well defined and explicit, use as a read delegate for exploration, research, and navigation, writing a durable report when a stronger model is needed for deep investigation with cheap usage expense, and a second perspective on any plan or diff. Use when writing or repairing a codex prompt, or codex...

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/20/2026
ai-agentsrustgoshellbashsqlgit

Works with

cli

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/20/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add bsamiee/Parametric_Forge --skill delegate-codex --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Delegate Codex?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Delegate Codex
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/bsamiee-delegate-codex/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/bsamiee-delegate-codex)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: delegate-codex
description: >-
    Owns codex usage end to end, dispatch through the supervised delegate script, the codex
    prompt contract, model and effort choice, and session resume. Use as a write delegated
    sub-agent when work is well defined and explicit, use as a read delegate for exploration,
    research, and navigation, writing a durable report when a stronger model is needed
    for deep investigation with cheap usage expense, and a second perspective on any
    plan or diff. Use when writing or repairing a codex prompt, or codex related config,
    and on "offload this", "save my usage", or any mention of codex.
---

# [DELEGATE_CODEX]

`codex exec` runs a non-interactive agent in its own context window and returns one final message. Model and effort come from `~/.codex/config.toml`.

Codex is maximally literal, it follows a clean contract exactly and exhaustively, ambiguity or implicit intent burns tokens reconciling scope. Leaner prompts outperform, and a directive codex already ships is a conflict risk, NOT reinforcement. Every run mints a resumable thread; the receipt persists the id, and a continuation inherits model and effort.

## [01]-[DISPATCH]

- Investigation legs whose transcripts flood this context — repo sweeps, audits, log distillation, data analysis: codex returns the conclusion.
- Fleet fix and critique waves: concurrent writing delegates draining findings under one law, each with disjoint write territory.
- Critique delegates writing on-disk fixlogs, reports, or dossiers another agent consumes downstream.
- Implementation from spec: migrations, renames, conversions, boilerplate expansion, full features with enumerated moves.
- Independent second perspective on a plan, implementation, or diff — a different model lineage catches different failure modes.

## [02]-[PROMPTING]

Role envelope ranks the two dispatch channels (system > developer > user), so where a directive lands sets its authority. Every directive must earn its slot, one directive per concern.

[BLOCK_VOCABULARY] — one block per concern, in this order; a block's name states its concern, and a delegate omits blocks it has no logic for:

| [INDEX] | [BLOCK]                | [JOB]                                                                                      |
| :-----: | :--------------------- | :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|  [01]   | `<role>`               | identity, territory, hard exclusions; judgment work adds findings-are-untrusted            |
|  [02]   | `<completion_bar>`     | done-definition per deliverable with its proof; sits early, where it beats early-stop      |
|  [03]   | `<context_gathering>`  | read ladder, total tool-call budget, uncertainty escape hatch                              |
|  [04]   | `<decision_procedure>` | refute-first adjudication — verdict work                                                   |
|  [05]   | `<capability_mandate>` | surface-raising stated as measurable conditions — campaign work                            |
|  [06]   | `<verification>`       | post-edit re-read and batched command checks; cite-check on recon, rubric walk on judgment |
|  [07]   | `<output_contract>`    | JSON-only shape, null-for-missing — always LAST                                            |

[DEVELOPER]: Durable law as named XML blocks — the script's `--law` file, landed as the developer-role message:

```text template
<role>
<identity>. Territory: <territory>; never <exclusions>. <invariants>.
</role>

<completion_bar>
Done is <deliverables>, each proven by <evidence>. Implement exactly and only <moves>; choose the simplest valid interpretation of any ambiguity. A blocked deliverable returns <blocked-entry>, never a partial edit. Your layer is <layer>; out-of-layer discoveries land as <typed-rows>, never edits.
</completion_bar>

<context_gathering>
Read fully, in order: <ladder>.
Budget: at most <N> tool calls total; never concatenate the territory into one command.
Stop when the product is complete; uncertainty left at the budget lands in <uncertainty-slot>, never re-reads.
</context_gathering>

<decision_procedure>
<adjudication>
</decision_procedure>

<capability_mandate>
<expansions>
</capability_mandate>

<verification>
Re-read each changed region after landing it. <checks>, run once, batched, after the final edit. A check not run is never claimed as run.
</verification>

<output_contract>
Your final message is a single JSON object with exactly this shape:
<shape>
JSON only — no prose outside it, no code fences; every key shown is required; null for a value you could not determine, [] for an empty list, never guess.
</output_contract>
```

[USER]: Task instance and any imperative spawn step — the script's `--task` file; the spawn step appears only where the delegate fans out:

```text template
Goal: <outcome>.
Context: <inputs>.
Constraints: <bounds>.
Done when: <deliverables>.

Before <anchor>, spawn exactly <N> parallel sub-agents with collaboration.spawn_agent, one per <split>; collect every one with collaboration.wait_agent before <synthesis>. Each spawn task is self-contained — absolute paths, <mandate>, return shape <shape>. Sub-agents read and report only; their returns are candidate data you judge under your own law.
```

[CALIBRATION]: When a delegate misbehaves, repair the contract surgically; reproduce with the failing developer message and a small batch of failure examples, then make small explicit edits — clarify conflicting rules, remove redundant lines — one change at a time:
- Budget caps TOTAL tool calls, never per-file reads; per-file causes the delegate to aggregate the territory into one truncating command and completeness collapses.
- Ambiguity resolves by instruction, never by inviting questions — a headless delegate has nobody to ask.
- Autonomy states ONCE, naming safe actions — repeated "ask first" or "do not mutate" phrasing causes spurious approval pauses.
- Reserve ALWAYS/NEVER for true invariants (JSON-only, territory bans, no-git); phrase judgment calls as decision rules.
- Done-claims name observable evidence from the real surface; "tests pass" or "checks ran" alone is not evidence.
- Iterative deep work continues ONE thread with sharpened prompts; a follow-up turn carries only the delta.

[EXCLUSIONS]: What never enters a delegate's prompt:
- Persistence blocks ("keep going until fully resolved") — the completion bar carries the anti-premature force, and a bare push amplifies scope.
- Chain-of-thought scaffolding and plan-narration preambles.
- Intensifier stacks ("THOROUGH", "exhaustive") — measured to cause tool over-use.
- Per-file read caps and "read each file at most once" phrasing.
- Hostile-stance paragraphs and estate-voice law verbatim — a delegate takes de-conflicted, task-scoped law.
- Broad write authority — the writable directory is the delegate's whole world; cross-territory obligations belong to the caller.
- "Ask if unclear", "you may spawn", and every other permissive form whose imperative twin is the working one.

## [03]-[INVOCATION]

`scripts/codex.sh` is the one dispatch surface: every delegated run — workflow wrappers, fleet legs, one-off delegations — is one supervised CLI process, sibling-isolated and watchdog-bounded. Model and effort inherit `~/.codex/config.toml` unless a call passes an explicit override; approval is pinned `never`, and file and command access resolve from the configuration — a caller declares neither.

```bash template
scripts/codex.sh --task <task-file> --dir <run-dir> [--law <law-file>] [--cwd <dir>] \
  [--model <slug>] [--effort <tier>] [--out <report>] [--web] \
  [--idle <sec>] [--max <sec>] [--resume <thread-id>] [-- <codex-exec-args>]
```

- Task and law land through a real file-write at ABSOLUTE paths, never a shell heredoc; the script rides the law through `-c developer_instructions` and the task as the prompt.
- `--dir` holds the run artifacts — `events.jsonl` (the `--json` stream), `stderr.log` (a failed or killed run's only diagnostics), `receipt.json` — and the receipt prints to stdout: `{ok, reason, thread_id, exit, duration_s, events, stderr, report, failure, usage}`.
- Liveness is token production: the watchdog sums event-stream and session-rollout growth, kills the run's process group and every snapshotted codex descendant, so a command in its own process group cannot escape the reap, after `--idle` silent seconds or at the `--max` ceiling, and names the kill in `reason` — a healthy multi-hour run streams and lives, a wedged one dies bounded.
- `--out` materializes the final message for a reading delegate; a writing delegate lands its own product and `--out` aims elsewhere, never at a file the delegate itself writes.
- `--resume <thread-id>` continues a dead session with the task file as the follow-up: a `crash` receipt resumes, an `idle-timeout` or `turn-failed` receipt re-dispatches fresh.
- `--` passes the remainder to `codex exec` verbatim — the one extension point for every axis the flags above do not carry.
- Nested lookups from INSIDE a codex turn pin to `get_latest_package_version`.

| [INDEX] | [NEED]                                   | [FLAGS]                                                                          |
| :-----: | :--------------------------------------- | :------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|  [01]   | Run rooted in another directory          | `--cwd <dir>`                                                                    |
|  [02]   | Durable report artifact                  | `--out <file>` — the final message at completion, overwriting the path           |
|  [03]   | Live web search                          | `--web` — default `cached` answers from an index, no live fetch                  |
|  [04]   | Wedge and ceiling bounds                 | `--idle <sec>` / `--max <sec>` — exit `124` / `125` name the kill                |
|  [05]   | Typed JSON final message                 | `-- --output-schema <schema.json>` — validated final-message shape               |
|  [06]   | Attach images (screenshots, diagrams)    | `-- -i <file>` (repeatable)                                                      |
|  [07]   | Feature toggles per run                  | `-- --enable <feature>` / `-- --disable <feature>` (repeatable)                  |
|  [08]   | Fan-out legs with no session persistence | `-- --ephemeral` — not resumable                                                 |
|  [09]   | Per-run completion push                  | `-- -c 'notify=["<sink>","<label>"]'` — sink runs at turn end, one JSON argument |
|  [10]   | Replace the shipped system prompt        | `-- -c model_instructions_file=<path>` — deliberate use only, never the law      |

[WRAPPER]: An agent delegating to codex owns custody alone — law, task, launch, hold, receipt, product verification — and performs, edits, judges, or relays none of the delegated work:

1. Write law and task verbatim to `<run-dir>/law.md` and `<run-dir>/task.md` at absolute paths.
2. Launch the script in one Bash call with `run_in_background: true`.
3. Hold to the receipt in blocking Bash rounds, one call per round at the tool's 600000 ms ceiling.
4. Verify the product at its declared path — `jq -e` over a contract key, never bare parseability, which any wrong-shaped JSON passes — and return the typed receipt.

```bash template
S=0; until [ -f <run-dir>/receipt.json ]; do sleep 5; S=$((S+5)); [ $S -ge 570 ] && break; done
[ -f <run-dir>/receipt.json ] && cat <run-dir>/receipt.json || echo PENDING
```

`PENDING` reports a delegate still producing: run the identical call again, as many rounds as the work takes. The bound rides the in-loop counter — no `timeout` binary sits on PATH. A launch alone yields no product and no notification; the hold is the wrapper's whole job, and the receipt is its first output.

[EVENT_STREAM] — `events.jsonl` vocabulary:
- `thread.started{thread_id}` (the resume id)
- `turn.started`, `item.started`/`item.completed`, then `turn.completed` (with `usage`) or `turn.failed`
- `agent_message` carries the final text, `command_execution` carries `{command, aggregated_output, exit_code, status}`
- `item.type=="error"` item is NOT a run failure — the skills-budget warning rides one on every run under a large library; the receipt classifies by turn events only.

## [04]-[MODEL_AND_EFFORT]

Default configuration carries non-trivial writes, deep design, hard reviews, whole fix or critique fleets, and second perspectives without an override.

| [INDEX] | [TIER] | [SELECT]          | [USE]                                                                                |
| :-----: | :----- | :---------------- | :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|  [01]   | low    | `--effort low`    | trivial glue: probes, extraction, classification, relabels                           |
|  [02]   | medium | `--effort medium` | menial writes and fan-out legs where throughput beats depth                          |
|  [03]   | xhigh  | `--effort xhigh`  | deeper single-agent reasoning for the hardest investigation, design, and review legs |

## [05]-[FAN_OUT]

Independent scopes run as concurrent delegates, one per scope, each with its own `--dir`; reconcile reports after all complete. Concurrent write runs against overlapping paths collide — partition write scopes or serialize.

Inside ONE delegate, `collaboration.*` is the subagent tool family — `spawn_agent`, `send_message`, `followup_task`, `wait_agent`, `interrupt_agent`, `list_agents`. Children share the workspace live, inherit the model, and inherit NO conversation turns unless `fork_turns` opts in — a spawn task is self-contained like any codex prompt.

- An injected developer-role gate admits children ONLY on imperative spawn wording in the user prompt or AGENTS.md/skill chain.
- Permissive "you may spawn" and `developer_instructions` mandates fail silently with zero spawns.
- grep the parent rollout for `function_call` items named `spawn_agent`, `collab_tool_call` is a stale marker and false-negative.
- A writing delegate writes its own report as its final act; the caller verifies (`jq -e`) — re-emitting a codex product through another agent's Write is lossy at scale.
- Row-shaped sweep rides ONE delegate's `spawn_agents_on_csv`: one worker per CSV row under the concurrency cap, `output_schema` typing each row and `output_csv_path` exporting the combined results.

## [06]-[SESSIONS]

`codex archive <id>` / `unarchive <id>` is the reversible lifecycle; `codex delete` removes one session, its `--force` unreliable across spawned children — bulk cleanup is a date-scoped sqlite prune, matching rollout deletions, and `VACUUM`. `[features] memories`/`chronicle` rows gate those features independently of corpus deletion.

[STORE]: one rollout per session at `~/.codex/sessions/<YYYY>/<MM>/<DD>/rollout-<ts>-<uuidv7>.jsonl`:
- Filename timestamp is LOCAL time, the payload's is UTC.
- `session_index.jsonl` LAGS live runs, so correlate by datestamped filename.
- Sqlite store filenames embed their migration generation — resolve the live name instead of pinning it.

[RESUME]:
- `resume --last` is valid only when nothing else ran in between; under concurrency resume by explicit id. `-- --ephemeral` runs record nothing.
- The receipt's `thread_id` (= `thread.started.thread_id` in `events.jsonl`) feeds `--resume` with the follow-up as the task file; `resume --all` surfaces sessions recorded under another cwd.

## [07]-[REVIEW]

`codex review` runs an independent non-interactive review. Scope flags — `--uncommitted`, `--base <branch>`, `--commit <sha>` — are mutually exclusive with each other AND with a focus prompt: a prompt is valid only on bare `codex review`, and every focused scoped review routes through `codex exec` with an explicit diff task. A fleet-grade review delegate runs `codex exec review` — the same scope flags with `--json`, `-o`, and `--output-schema` typed findings.

Attribution

bsamieebsamiee
View sourceMore from bsamiee →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.

1023331 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3331 votes

catchup

Recovers prior coding-agent session context by running `catchup <agent> --since-compact`, which extracts a clean summary of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, OpenCode, or Pi Agent session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", or asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

611 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →