Use when starting empirical analysis, creating a data pipeline, generating results, or when data or model specifications change. Enforces end-to-end reproducibility — every number in the paper must be regenerable from raw data by a script with a fixed seed. Replaces TDD for the research domain.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill replication-driven-research --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Replication Driven Research?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-replication-driven-research)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: replication-driven-research
description: Use when starting empirical analysis, creating a data pipeline, generating results, or when data or model specifications change. Enforces end-to-end reproducibility — every number in the paper must be regenerable from raw data by a script with a fixed seed. Replaces TDD for the research domain.
---
# Replication-Driven Research
## Overview
This skill is the research-domain analogue of test-driven development. The core philosophy is the same as TDD: evidence before claims, automated verification, invalidation on input change. No result is valid until the pipeline runs end-to-end without error. No number enters the paper until a script regenerates it from raw data. This is the single most important discipline in the superpapers plugin, and every analysis skill defers to it.
## When to Use
- Start of a new empirical project
- First time running analysis code in a project
- Before generating any table or figure for a paper
- After any change to raw data, sample selection, or model specification
- Before declaring a result "final" or "verified"
- When the user asks "is this reproducible?"
- When reviewer comments require re-running the analysis
## Canonical Directory Structure
The canonical project layout is:
```
project-root/
├── data/
│ ├── raw/ # raw downloads, never manually edited
│ ├── processed/ # cleaned data, output of scripts
│ └── manifest.md # documents every dataset (source, URL, date, variables)
├── code/
│ ├── 01_collect.R # or .py — fetches raw data
│ ├── 02_clean.R # raw → processed
│ ├── 03_analyze.R # processed → results
│ └── 04_figures.R # processed → figures
├── output/
│ ├── tables/ # .tex files generated by scripts
│ ├── figures/ # .pdf vector files generated by scripts
│ └── logs/ # execution logs with timestamp + seed
├── paper/
│ ├── paper.tex # main document
│ ├── references.bib # bibliography
│ └── sections/ # split sections if needed
└── CLAUDE.superpapers.md # project settings
```
On first invocation in a project, propose this structure to the user. The user can accept, adapt, or refuse. If the user refuses or has a different layout, the skill still works but flags deviations when encountered so they are not silent.
## Mandatory Steps
1. **Verify or scaffold structure.** If `data/raw`, `code/`, and `output/` do not exist, propose scaffolding. Wait for user confirmation before creating any directories or files at the project root.
2. **Document every dataset in `data/manifest.md`.** Required fields per dataset: name, source (URL or API endpoint), description, collection date, variables used, frequency, period covered, license or usage notes. See the Manifest Format section below.
3. **Every result must have a generating script.** No exceptions. Pasting numbers from a console or notebook into the paper is forbidden. Tables enter the paper via `\input{output/tables/...}`; figures enter via `\includegraphics{output/figures/...}`.
4. **Fix the seed in every script that uses randomness.** Document the seed in the script header. Use the project-level default seed from `CLAUDE.superpapers.md` — read from the current working directory, or walk up parent directories until found — unless the script explicitly overrides it and explains why. If the file is absent, ask the user for a project-level default on first need.
5. **Run the pipeline end-to-end before declaring any result verified.** Use a top-level `run_all.sh` (or `Makefile`) that executes scripts in the correct order. Verify exit code 0 and that every expected output file exists and is non-empty.
6. **Log every run.** Each end-to-end execution writes to `output/logs/YYYY-MM-DD_HH-MM-SS.log` with: timestamp, seed, relevant package versions, total runtime, input file hashes, exit status. See the Execution Log Format section below.
7. **Invalidate on input change.** If `data/raw` or any script in `code/` changes, all downstream outputs are stale. Re-run the full pipeline. Do not trust cached tables or figures after an input change.
## Manifest Format
Each dataset entry in `data/manifest.md` follows this format:
```markdown
## unemployment_br
- **Source:** IBGE — PNADC Trimestral
- **URL:** https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/tabela/4099
- **Collected:** 2026-03-15
- **Variables:** unemployment_rate, quarter, state
- **Frequency:** Quarterly
- **Period:** 2012Q1 – 2025Q4
- **Collected by:** code/01_collect.R
- **License:** IBGE open data
```
The manifest is the single source of truth for what data is in the project. If a dataset exists in `data/raw/` but not in the manifest, fix the manifest before proceeding.
## Execution Log Format
Each end-to-end run appends a log entry with one field per line:
```
timestamp: 2026-04-10T14:23:45-03:00
seed: 20260410
R version: 4.4.1
renv lockfile hash: abc123...
inputs:
data/raw/pnadc.csv: sha256:def456...
scripts:
code/01_collect.R: OK (4.2s)
code/02_clean.R: OK (12.8s)
code/03_analyze.R: OK (45.1s)
outputs:
output/tables/tab_descriptives.tex: created
output/tables/tab_main.tex: created
output/figures/fig_trend.pdf: created
exit: 0
total runtime: 62.1s
```
The log is append-only. Keep every log entry — they are the audit trail for every published result.
## Anti-Patterns
- Copying a number from console output into the paper
- "It worked yesterday" without re-running after a change to data or code
- Results with no traceable script from raw data
- Undocumented manual steps in the pipeline (opening a GUI, editing a spreadsheet, clicking a button)
- Using `set.seed(Sys.time())`, `random.seed(None)`, or no seed at all
- Ignoring warnings emitted by the pipeline run
- Running only one script and trusting cached outputs from other scripts
- Editing raw data files manually to "fix" anomalies
- Committing `output/` files that are not produced by the current pipeline
## Verification Before Completion
- [ ] `data/raw/` contains only downloaded files, never hand-edited
- [ ] `data/manifest.md` documents every dataset in `data/raw/` and `data/processed/`
- [ ] Every `.tex` table and `.pdf` figure in `output/` has a script in `code/` that generates it
- [ ] A top-level runner (`run_all.sh` or `Makefile`) exists and runs end-to-end with exit code 0
- [ ] Seeds are fixed and documented at the top of every stochastic script
- [ ] An execution log exists in `output/logs/` for the latest run
- [ ] No numeric values hardcoded in `paper.tex` — all results pulled via `\input{}`
- [ ] No orphaned outputs in `output/` that the current pipeline does not produce
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!