Numerical algorithms and computational techniques for statistics
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill numerical-methods --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Numerical Methods?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-numerical-methods)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: numerical-methods
description: Numerical algorithms and computational techniques for statistics
---
# Numerical Methods
You are an expert in numerical stability and computational aspects of statistical methods.
## Floating-Point Fundamentals
### IEEE 754 Double Precision
- **Precision**: ~15-17 significant decimal digits
- **Range**: ~10⁻³⁰⁸ to 10³⁰⁸
- **Machine epsilon**: ε ≈ 2.2 × 10⁻¹⁶
- **Special values**: Inf, -Inf, NaN
### Key Constants in R
```r
.Machine$double.eps # ~2.22e-16 (machine epsilon)
.Machine$double.xmax # ~1.80e+308 (max finite)
.Machine$double.xmin # ~2.23e-308 (min positive normalized)
.Machine$double.neg.eps # ~1.11e-16 (negative epsilon)
```
## Common Numerical Issues
### 1. Catastrophic Cancellation
When subtracting nearly equal numbers:
```r
# BAD: loses precision
x <- 1e10 + 1
y <- 1e10
result <- x - y # Should be 1, may have errors
# BETTER: reformulate to avoid subtraction
# Example: Computing variance
var_bad <- mean(x^2) - mean(x)^2 # Can be negative!
var_good <- sum((x - mean(x))^2) / (n-1) # Always non-negative
```
### 2. Overflow/Underflow
```r
# BAD: overflow
prod(1:200) # Inf
# GOOD: work on log scale
sum(log(1:200)) # Then exp() if needed
# BAD: underflow in probabilities
prod(dnorm(x)) # 0 for large x
# GOOD: sum log probabilities
sum(dnorm(x, log = TRUE))
```
### 3. Log-Sum-Exp Trick
Essential for working with log probabilities:
```r
log_sum_exp <- function(log_x) {
max_log <- max(log_x)
if (is.infinite(max_log)) return(max_log)
max_log + log(sum(exp(log_x - max_log)))
}
# Example: log(exp(-1000) + exp(-1001))
log_sum_exp(c(-1000, -1001)) # Correct: ~-999.69
log(exp(-1000) + exp(-1001)) # Wrong: -Inf
```
### 4. Softmax Stability
```r
# BAD
softmax_bad <- function(x) exp(x) / sum(exp(x))
# GOOD
softmax <- function(x) {
x_max <- max(x)
exp_x <- exp(x - x_max)
exp_x / sum(exp_x)
}
```
## Matrix Computations
### Conditioning
The condition number κ(A) measures sensitivity to perturbation:
- κ(A) = ‖A‖ · ‖A⁻¹‖
- Rule: Expect to lose log₁₀(κ) digits of accuracy
- κ > 10¹⁵ means matrix is numerically singular
```r
# Check condition number
kappa(X, exact = TRUE)
# For regression: check X'X conditioning
kappa(crossprod(X))
```
### Solving Linear Systems
**Prefer**: Decomposition methods over explicit inversion
```r
# BAD: explicit inverse
beta <- solve(t(X) %*% X) %*% t(X) %*% y
# GOOD: QR decomposition
beta <- qr.coef(qr(X), y)
# BETTER for positive definite: Cholesky
R <- chol(crossprod(X))
beta <- backsolve(R, forwardsolve(t(R), crossprod(X, y)))
# For ill-conditioned: SVD/pseudoinverse
beta <- MASS::ginv(X) %*% y
```
### Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices
Always use specialized methods:
```r
# Cholesky for SPD
L <- chol(Sigma)
# Eigendecomposition
eig <- eigen(Sigma, symmetric = TRUE)
# Check positive definiteness
all(eigen(Sigma, symmetric = TRUE, only.values = TRUE)$values > 0)
```
## Optimization Stability
### Gradient Computation
```r
# Numerical gradient (for verification)
numerical_grad <- function(f, x, h = sqrt(.Machine$double.eps)) {
sapply(seq_along(x), function(i) {
x_plus <- x_minus <- x
x_plus[i] <- x[i] + h
x_minus[i] <- x[i] - h
(f(x_plus) - f(x_minus)) / (2 * h)
})
}
# Central difference is O(h²) accurate
# Forward difference is O(h) accurate
```
### Hessian Stability
```r
# Check Hessian is positive definite at optimum
check_hessian <- function(H, tol = 1e-8) {
eigs <- eigen(H, symmetric = TRUE, only.values = TRUE)$values
min_eig <- min(eigs)
list(
positive_definite = min_eig > tol,
min_eigenvalue = min_eig,
condition_number = max(eigs) / min_eig
)
}
```
### Line Search
For gradient descent stability:
```r
backtracking_line_search <- function(f, x, d, grad, alpha = 1, rho = 0.5, c = 1e-4) {
# Armijo condition
while (f(x + alpha * d) > f(x) + c * alpha * sum(grad * d)) {
alpha <- rho * alpha
if (alpha < 1e-10) break
}
alpha
}
```
## Integration and Quadrature
### Numerical Integration Guidelines
```r
# Adaptive quadrature (default choice)
integrate(f, lower, upper)
# For infinite limits
integrate(f, -Inf, Inf)
# For highly oscillatory or peaked functions
# Increase subdivisions
integrate(f, lower, upper, subdivisions = 1000)
# For known singularities, split the domain
```
### Monte Carlo Integration
```r
mc_integrate <- function(f, n, lower, upper) {
x <- runif(n, lower, upper)
fx <- sapply(x, f)
estimate <- (upper - lower) * mean(fx)
se <- (upper - lower) * sd(fx) / sqrt(n)
list(value = estimate, se = se)
}
```
## Root Finding
### Newton-Raphson Stability
```r
newton_raphson <- function(f, df, x0, tol = 1e-8, max_iter = 100) {
x <- x0
for (i in 1:max_iter) {
fx <- f(x)
dfx <- df(x)
# Check for near-zero derivative
if (abs(dfx) < .Machine$double.eps * 100) {
warning("Near-zero derivative")
break
}
x_new <- x - fx / dfx
if (abs(x_new - x) < tol) break
x <- x_new
}
x
}
```
### Brent's Method
For robust root finding without derivatives:
```r
uniroot(f, interval = c(lower, upper), tol = .Machine$double.eps^0.5)
```
## Statistical Computing Patterns
### Safe Likelihood Computation
```r
# Always work with log-likelihood
log_lik <- function(theta, data) {
# Compute log-likelihood, not likelihood
sum(dnorm(data, mean = theta[1], sd = theta[2], log = TRUE))
}
```
### Robust Standard Errors
```r
# Sandwich estimator with numerical stability
sandwich_se <- function(score, hessian) {
# Check Hessian conditioning
H_inv <- tryCatch(
solve(hessian),
error = function(e) MASS::ginv(hessian)
)
meat <- crossprod(score)
V <- H_inv %*% meat %*% H_inv
sqrt(diag(V))
}
```
### Bootstrap with Error Handling
```r
safe_bootstrap <- function(data, statistic, R = 1000) {
results <- numeric(R)
failures <- 0
for (i in 1:R) {
boot_data <- data[sample(nrow(data), replace = TRUE), ]
result <- tryCatch(
statistic(boot_data),
error = function(e) NA
)
results[i] <- result
if (is.na(result)) failures <- failures + 1
}
if (failures > 0.1 * R) {
warning(sprintf("%.1f%% bootstrap failures", 100 * failures / R))
}
list(
estimate = mean(results, na.rm = TRUE),
se = sd(results, na.rm = TRUE),
failures = failures
)
}
```
## Debugging Numerical Issues
### Diagnostic Checklist
1. **Check for NaN/Inf**: `any(is.nan(x))`, `any(is.infinite(x))`
2. **Check conditioning**: `kappa(matrix)`
3. **Check eigenvalues**: For PD matrices
4. **Check gradients**: Numerically vs analytically
5. **Check scale**: Variables on similar scales?
### Debugging Functions
```r
# Trace NaN/Inf sources
debug_numeric <- function(x, name = "x") {
cat(sprintf("%s: range [%.3g, %.3g], ", name, min(x), max(x)))
cat(sprintf("NaN: %d, Inf: %d, -Inf: %d\n",
sum(is.nan(x)), sum(x == Inf), sum(x == -Inf)))
}
# Check relative error
rel_error <- function(computed, true) {
abs(computed - true) / max(abs(true), 1)
}
```
## Best Practices Summary
1. **Always work on log scale** for products of probabilities
2. **Use QR or Cholesky** instead of matrix inversion
3. **Check conditioning** before solving linear systems
4. **Center and scale** predictors in regression
5. **Handle edge cases** (empty data, singular matrices)
6. **Use existing implementations** (LAPACK, BLAS) when possible
7. **Test with extreme values** (very small, very large, near-zero)
8. **Compare analytical and numerical gradients**
9. **Monitor convergence** in iterative algorithms
10. **Document numerical assumptions** and limitations
## Key References
- Higham
- Golub & Van LoanIs this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!