Mechanical verification procedure for the verifier agent — detect available checks from project configuration, run them fastest-first in speed order, capture evidence, and derive a PASS/FAIL verdict. Loaded when pre-completion quality checks need to run.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add bostonaholic/team --skill running-quality-checks --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Running Quality Checks?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/bostonaholic-running-quality-checks)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: running-quality-checks
description: Mechanical verification procedure for the verifier agent — detect available checks from project configuration, run them fastest-first in speed order, capture evidence, and derive a PASS/FAIL verdict. Loaded when pre-completion quality checks need to run.
user-invocable: false
---
# Running Quality Checks
The verifier's procedure: detect the checks the project configures, run
them in speed order, and report evidence. No opinions — just evidence.
## Process
1. **Detect available checks.** Inspect project configuration to find
runnable checks:
- `package.json` scripts (format, lint, typecheck, build, test)
- `Makefile` targets
- CI configuration (`.github/workflows/`, `.circleci/`, etc.)
- Tool configuration files (`.eslintrc`, `tsconfig.json`, `prettier.config`,
`biome.json`, etc.)
2. **Run checks in speed order.** Execute each detected check, fastest first:
1. **Format** — Prettier, Biome format, or equivalent (`--check` mode)
2. **Lint** — ESLint, Biome lint, Clippy, or equivalent
3. **Type check** — TypeScript `tsc --noEmit`, mypy, or equivalent
4. **Build** — Production build command
5. **Test** — Test suite execution
3. **Capture results.** For each check, record:
- The exact command run
- The exit code
- For failures: the relevant error output (trimmed to essential lines)
- For passes: one-line confirmation
## Verdict Logic
- **PASS** — All detected checks passed (at least one check must exist).
- **FAIL** — One or more detected checks failed. List every failure.
- **FAIL** — No checks detected at all. A project with zero configured quality
checks (no linter, no type checker, no test suite, no build) cannot pass
verification. Report what is missing and recommend configuring at least
format, lint, and test scripts.
## Rules
- Run every check you can detect. Do not skip checks unless they are not
configured in the project.
- Do NOT fix failures. Report them exactly as they occur.
- Do NOT interpret results beyond pass/fail. No suggestions, no opinions.
- Keep output concise. For failures, include only the lines needed to
understand what went wrong. Do not dump entire build logs.
- If a check hangs for more than 120 seconds, kill it and report TIMEOUT.
- **Do NOT retry to mask intermittent failures.** Each check runs once. If
a test or check fails, report it. If you happen to know the same test
passed in a previous run (e.g., the orchestrator re-dispatched after a
code fix), note the intermittency in the report
(`### Notes — Intermittent: testFoo passed on retry, the underlying race condition is unresolved`).
Reruns that turn red → green without a code change are evidence of a
flake or a real intermittent bug, not a verdict of PASS.
- **Coverage is reported, not gated.** If the project has a coverage tool
configured, run it and report the coverage delta for changed files
(e.g., "coverage on changed files: 73% → 78%"). Do NOT gate on an
absolute coverage threshold. Coverage tells you what is NOT tested. It
does not tell you what IS tested is good. Pair with mutation testing
when available. Require coverage to trend upward rather than mandating a
fixed threshold.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!