Have OpenAI Codex review the current branch with documentation research. Use for second-opinion code reviews or when you want cross-AI verification.
Scanned 9/20/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add benjaminshoemaker/ai_coding_project_base --skill codex-review --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Codex Review?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/benjaminshoemaker-codex-review)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: codex-review
description: Have OpenAI Codex review the current branch with documentation research. Use for second-opinion code reviews or when you want cross-AI verification.
argument-hint: "[focus] [--upstream FILE] [--research TOPICS] [--base BRANCH] [--model MODEL]"
allowed-tools: Bash, Read, Glob, Grep
---
# Codex Review
Invoke OpenAI's Codex CLI to review the current branch, with instructions to research relevant documentation before reviewing.
## When to Use
- You want a second opinion on your implementation
- You want cross-verification between different AI models
- The implementation uses tools/libraries where current docs would help
- You've completed a feature and want thorough review before merging
- Can be invoked by other workflow skills for automated cross-model review
## Prerequisites
- Codex CLI installed (`codex --version` works)
- Valid OpenAI authentication (`codex login` completed)
- On a feature branch with commits to review
## Arguments
| Argument | Example | Description |
|----------|---------|-------------|
| `focus` | `security` | Focus review on specific area |
| `--upstream FILE` | `--upstream PRODUCT_SPEC.md` | Check that code preserves requirements from upstream doc |
| `--research TOPICS` | `--research "Supabase, NextAuth"` | Explicit technologies for Codex to research |
| `--base BRANCH` | `--base develop` | Compare against different base branch |
| `--model MODEL` | `--model gpt-5.2-codex` | Use specific Codex model |
## Workflow
Copy this checklist and track progress:
```
Codex Review Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Verify Codex CLI available
- [ ] Step 2: Gather branch context
- [ ] Step 3: Generate review prompt
- [ ] Step 4: Invoke Codex
- [ ] Step 5: Present results
```
## Step 1: Verify Codex CLI
### Check if Running Inside Codex
```bash
# Codex sets CODEX_SANDBOX when running
if [ -n "$CODEX_SANDBOX" ]; then
echo "RUNNING_IN_CODEX"
fi
```
**If running inside Codex CLI:**
```
CODEX REVIEW: SKIPPED
=====================
Reason: Already running inside Codex CLI.
Cross-model verification requires a different model.
Continuing without cross-model verification.
```
Return early. Do NOT block the parent workflow.
### Check Codex CLI Installed
```bash
codex --version
```
If not installed:
```
Codex CLI is not installed or not in PATH.
Install: https://github.com/openai/codex
Then run: codex login
```
### Check Authentication
```bash
codex login status
```
If not authenticated:
```
Codex authentication failed. Run:
codex login
```
**If ANY pre-flight check fails:** Report the specific failure and STOP.
Do NOT attempt alternative commands or workarounds. Return status: `skipped`.
### Read Configuration
Read `.claude/settings.local.json` for settings:
```bash
# Read config
CODE_MODEL=$(jq -r '.codexReview.codeModel // "gpt-5.3-codex"' .claude/settings.local.json 2>/dev/null || echo "gpt-5.3-codex")
TIMEOUT_MINS=$(jq -r '.codexReview.reviewTimeoutMinutes // 20' .claude/settings.local.json 2>/dev/null || echo "20")
```
If `codexReview.enabled` is explicitly `false`, skip with message.
### Select Model
Priority order: `--model` flag > config > default (`gpt-5.3-codex`)
```bash
# 1. Explicit --model flag always wins
if [ -n "$EXPLICIT_MODEL" ]; then
CODEX_MODEL="$EXPLICIT_MODEL"
# 2. Use configured code model
else
CODEX_MODEL="$CODE_MODEL"
fi
```
**Note:** For reviewing non-code documents (specs, plans), use `/codex-consult` instead.
## Step 2: Gather Branch Context
Collect information about the current branch:
```bash
# Current branch name
git branch --show-current
# Commits on this branch (vs main or specified base)
BASE_BRANCH="${BASE:-main}"
git log --oneline $BASE_BRANCH..HEAD 2>/dev/null || git log --oneline -10
# Changed files summary
git diff $BASE_BRANCH...HEAD --stat 2>/dev/null || git diff HEAD~5 --stat
# Get the merge base
git merge-base $BASE_BRANCH HEAD 2>/dev/null
```
**Auto-detect research topics** from changed files if `--research` not provided:
- Check `package.json` for dependencies
- Look at import statements in changed files
- Identify frameworks (Next.js, React, etc.)
## Step 3: Generate Review Prompt
See [PROMPT_TEMPLATE.md](PROMPT_TEMPLATE.md) for the full prompt structure.
Key sections:
1. **Pre-Review Research** — Technologies Codex should research
2. **Review Context** — Branch, commits, changed files
3. **Upstream Context** (if `--upstream` provided) — Requirements to preserve
4. **Review Instructions** — What to check, output format
## Step 4: Invoke Codex
See [CODEX_INVOCATION.md](CODEX_INVOCATION.md) for detailed command building.
**IMPORTANT — Execution Rules:**
- Execute synchronously. NEVER use `run_in_background` for Codex invocations.
- If this command fails, report the exit code and return `status: error`.
Do NOT retry with different flags or subcommands.
- Use the Bash tool's `timeout` parameter set to `TIMEOUT_MINS * 60 * 1000` (ms)
instead of the shell `timeout` command or `run_in_background`.
### Safety Guard (prevent accidental commits)
Before invoking Codex, protect the working tree:
```bash
# Record current HEAD so we can detect if Codex makes commits
HEAD_BEFORE=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
```
**Note:** Do NOT stash uncommitted changes — stash/pop triggers file-system events
that confuse IDE watchers, hot-reload, and other processes. The HEAD check alone is sufficient.
### Invoke Codex
See [CODEX_INVOCATION.md](CODEX_INVOCATION.md) for the full command, effort handling,
and safety checks. The invocation file is the single source of truth — do not
duplicate the command here.
**Flags explained:**
- `--sandbox danger-full-access`: Enables network access for documentation research
- `-c 'approval_policy="never"'`: Non-interactive execution
- `-c 'features.search=true'`: Enable web search for documentation research
- `-o $OUTPUT_FILE`: Write final response to file for reliable parsing
- `-`: Read prompt from stdin
**Important:** Do NOT use `2>&1` — Codex streams progress to stderr and final output to stdout. Merging them corrupts the parseable response.
## Step 5: Present Results
Parse and present the Codex output. See [EVALUATION_PRACTICES.md](EVALUATION_PRACTICES.md) for severity classification.
### Output Format (User-Facing)
```
CODEX REVIEW COMPLETE
=====================
Branch: feature/add-auth
Reviewed by: Codex ({model})
Status: PASS WITH NOTES
Critical Issues: None
Recommendations:
1. [src/auth/handler.ts:45] Consider adding rate limiting
→ Suggestion: Use express-rate-limit middleware
2. [src/auth/session.ts:12] Session expiry not explicitly configured
→ Suggestion: Add explicit maxAge to session config
Positive Findings:
- Good separation of concerns in auth module
- Proper error handling for OAuth failures
{If --upstream provided}
Context Preservation: ✓ All 5 items from PRODUCT_SPEC.md preserved
{/If}
```
### Output Format (Programmatic — when invoked by another skill)
When invoked by another skill, return structured data:
```json
{
"status": "pass | pass_with_notes | needs_attention | error | skipped",
"critical_issues": [],
"recommendations": [],
"positive_findings": [],
"context_preservation": {
"checked": true,
"all_preserved": true,
"missing_items": []
}
}
```
## Error Handling
| Failure | Action |
|---------|--------|
| Codex CLI not found | Report and stop |
| Authentication failed | Suggest `codex login` |
| No commits on branch | Report nothing to review |
| Codex times out | Return partial output if available |
| Output is malformed | Attempt best-effort parsing: extract any text between known markers (e.g., "Critical Issues:", "Recommendations:"). If no structure found, return the raw output as a single recommendation with status `pass_with_notes` and note "Codex output could not be parsed — raw response included" |
## Configuration
Read from `.claude/settings.local.json`:
```json
{
"codexReview": {
"enabled": true,
"codeModel": "gpt-5.3-codex",
"reviewTimeoutMinutes": 20
}
}
```
| Setting | Default | Description |
|---------|---------|-------------|
| `enabled` | `true` | Set to `false` to disable Codex review |
| `codeModel` | `"gpt-5.3-codex"` | Model for code review tasks |
| `reviewTimeoutMinutes` | `20` | Max time for review invocations |
For document consultation (specs, plans), see `/codex-consult` which uses `codexConsult` config.
**For CI/headless environments:** Set `CODEX_API_KEY` environment variable for authentication without interactive login.
## Examples
**Basic review:**
```
/codex-review
```
**Focus on security:**
```
/codex-review security
```
**Verify against upstream spec:**
```
/codex-review --upstream PRODUCT_SPEC.md
```
**Explicit research topics:**
```
/codex-review --research "Supabase Auth, Next.js App Router"
```
**Different base branch and model:**
```
/codex-review --base develop --model gpt-5.2-codex
```
---
**REMINDER**: NEVER use `run_in_background` for Codex invocations. NEVER use `2>&1` — it corrupts parseable output.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!