Coordinates a social-science study through the stage-gated methods pipeline — question then design-gate then measurement-gate then sampling-gate then the right analysis module then inference-gate then reporting — holding a single YAML Design Passport that each gate reads and appends, and enforcing gate order with PASS / WARN / BLOCK semantics (design-gate and inference-gate are fail-closed). It is thin: it routes and holds the artifact, it does not run analysis itself. Use when a researcher d...
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills --skill alterlab-ssci-orchestrator --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Alterlab Ssci Orchestrator?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/alterlab-ieu-alterlab-ssci-orchestrator)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: alterlab-ssci-orchestrator
description: "Coordinates a social-science study through the stage-gated methods pipeline — question then design-gate then measurement-gate then sampling-gate then the right analysis module then inference-gate then reporting — holding a single YAML Design Passport that each gate reads and appends, and enforcing gate order with PASS / WARN / BLOCK semantics (design-gate and inference-gate are fail-closed). It is thin: it routes and holds the artifact, it does not run analysis itself. Use when a researcher describes a whole social-science study end to end, asks to run the methods pipeline or a full methodology review, or wants the design-to-inference workflow coordinated rather than a single step. For a single stage trigger that gate directly (alterlab-ssci-design-gate, -measurement-gate, -sampling-gate, -inference-gate); for multi-agent execution mechanics see alterlab-workflow-orchestration. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite."
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read Bash(python:*)
compatibility: No API key required. A thin discipline-enforcing pipeline coordinator; it dispatches to sibling gate/analysis skills that run locally. Extends the composition patterns of alterlab-workflow-orchestration.
metadata:
skill-author: AlterLab
version: "1.1.0"
depends_on: "alterlab-ssci-design-gate, alterlab-ssci-measurement-gate, alterlab-ssci-sampling-gate, alterlab-ssci-reflexivity-gate, alterlab-ssci-inference-gate; dispatches to alterlab-causal-inference, alterlab-sem-psychometrics, alterlab-qca, alterlab-sna, alterlab-abm-mesa, alterlab-text-as-data, alterlab-survey-analysis, alterlab-qualitative-analysis, alterlab-multilevel-models, alterlab-meta-analysis, alterlab-missing-data; extends alterlab-workflow-orchestration"
---
# SSci Orchestrator — Route the Study, Hold the Passport, Enforce the Gates
**Skill type: DISCIPLINE-ENFORCING (thin coordinator).** This is the conductor of the
social-science methods spine. It does **no analysis**. It walks a study through the gates in
order, carries a single **Design Passport** between them, and refuses to let a stage run before
its prerequisite gate has passed. For the actual routing/refusal logic, each gate owns its own
skill; this skill owns *sequence* and *hand-off*.
## The Core Rule
```
NO STAGE RUNS BEFORE ITS GATE PASSES. THE PASSPORT IS THE SINGLE SOURCE OF TRUTH.
```
A methods pipeline fails when stages run out of order — sampling sized before the design is
fixed, a causal estimator run before the identifying assumption is pinned, a discussion written
before the claim is audited. The orchestrator makes the order non-optional and makes every gate's
verdict visible in one artifact.
## When to Use This Skill
- "Walk me through designing and analyzing this whole study."
- "Run the methods pipeline / a full methodology review on my project."
- "I have a research question, some data, and a survey — take it from design to inference."
- The user's ask spans **more than one** gate/module and needs coordination.
### Does NOT Trigger
| The request is really about… | Route to | Why not this skill |
|---|---|---|
| A single stage (design, measurement, sampling, or claim audit) | the matching `alterlab-ssci-*-gate` | Trigger the gate directly; no orchestration needed. |
| Running one analysis method (DiD, CFA, QCA, SNA, ABM, text) | the matching analysis module | The module does it; the orchestrator only dispatches. |
| Multi-agent execution mechanics (fan-out, judge panels) | `alterlab-workflow-orchestration` | General composition engine; this skill is the social-science-specific spine on top of it. |
| A non-methods task (writing prose, literature search) | `alterlab-paper-writer` / `alterlab-deep-research` | Outside the methods pipeline. |
## The Pipeline
```
research question
└─> [design-gate] ── pins design_type + identifying_assumption ──▶ (MANDATORY: BLOCK-capable)
└─> [measurement-gate] quantitative constructs ─┐
[reflexivity-gate] qualitative/interpretivist ─┴─▶ (measurement-stage analog)
└─> [sampling-gate] ── frame + method + size logic ──▶ (WARN default)
└─> [ANALYSIS MODULE] ── dispatched by design_type / data (see routing table) ──▶
└─> [inference-gate] ── audits claims vs design/sample ──▶ (MANDATORY: BLOCK-capable)
└─> reporting
```
At the measurement stage the orchestrator picks the **paradigm-appropriate** gate:
`alterlab-ssci-measurement-gate` for quantitative constructs (reliability/validity/invariance),
`alterlab-ssci-reflexivity-gate` for qualitative/interpretivist work (positionality + Lincoln &
Guba trustworthiness). Mixed-methods runs both on the respective strands.
**Analysis-module routing** (by `design_type` + data in the Passport):
| If the design / data is… | Dispatch to |
|---|---|
| Complex-sample survey (weights / strata / clusters / FPC) | `alterlab-survey-analysis` |
| Quasi-experimental / observational causal (DiD, IV, RDD, panel FE) | `alterlab-causal-inference` |
| Clustered / nested / longitudinal (variance partitioning) | `alterlab-multilevel-models` |
| Latent constructs, CFA / SEM / IRT / invariance | `alterlab-sem-psychometrics` |
| Small-N configurational, set-theoretic (fsQCA/csQCA) | `alterlab-qca` |
| Relational / network data | `alterlab-sna` |
| Simulation of interacting agents | `alterlab-abm-mesa` |
| Corpora / open-ended text (computational) | `alterlab-text-as-data` |
| Qualitative coding of interviews / open text (human) | `alterlab-qualitative-analysis` |
| Pooling effect sizes across studies | `alterlab-meta-analysis` |
| Interpretive / theory-building | `alterlab-qualitative-methods` (existing) |
| Combined strands | `alterlab-mixed-methods` (existing) |
**Cross-cutting**: when the dataset has missing values, `alterlab-missing-data` runs *before* the
analysis module (state the mechanism, multiply impute) so every downstream estimate pools correctly.
Full stage contract, PASS/WARN/BLOCK rules, and the analysis-module decision logic:
`references/pipeline_contract.md`. A stdlib validator that reads a Design Passport and reports
the next gate and whether it is fail-closed: `scripts/passport.py`.
## The Design Passport
One YAML artifact, created at entry and appended by each gate. The orchestrator never overwrites a
prior gate's fields; it only advances the `stage` and dispatches the next gate.
```yaml
research_question: <text>
stage: <design | measurement | sampling | analysis | inference | done>
design_type: <set by design-gate>
identifying_assumption: <set by design-gate>
claim_type: <causal | associational | descriptive>
constructs: [<appended by measurement-gate — quantitative>]
positionality: <appended by reflexivity-gate — qualitative>
trustworthiness: {credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability} # reflexivity-gate
reflexivity_evidence: <appended by reflexivity-gate — qualitative>
sampling: {<appended by sampling-gate>}
analysis_module: [<chosen by the orchestrator from design_type / data>]
claims: [<audited by inference-gate>]
gate_log: [{gate: design, verdict: PASS|WARN|BLOCK, note: ...}, ...]
```
## Gate verdict semantics
- **PASS** — the gate's discipline is satisfied; advance.
- **WARN** — an advisory issue; advance **with the caveat recorded** in `gate_log` and surfaced in
the final report (default for measurement/sampling when non-fatal).
- **BLOCK** — fail-closed; the pipeline **cannot advance** until resolved. Design-gate BLOCKs when no
design/assumption can be named; inference-gate BLOCKs when a claim exceeds the design/sample.
## Self-Check Before Advancing a Stage
- Has the current stage's gate emitted a verdict recorded in `gate_log`?
- If the verdict is BLOCK, has it been resolved (not bypassed) before advancing?
- Is the analysis module chosen from `design_type`, not from the user's tool preference?
- Does the Passport still carry every upstream field (nothing overwritten)?
## References
- `references/pipeline_contract.md` — stage-by-stage contract, verdict rules, analysis-module routing logic, worked run.
- `scripts/passport.py` — stdlib Design Passport validator / next-gate reporter.
Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!