Use when auditing HARNESS.md, pre-commit hooks, pre-push hooks, architecture gates, or CI workflows for tunacode-cli. This skill treats any mismatch, skipped gate, or failing check as a critical failure and requires manual one-by-one execution rather than make targets, batch wrappers, or summary-only audits.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add alchemiststudiosDOTai/tunacode --skill audit-harness --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Audit Harness?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/alchemiststudiosdotai-audit-harness)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: audit-harness
description: Use when auditing HARNESS.md, pre-commit hooks, pre-push hooks, architecture gates, or CI workflows for tunacode-cli. This skill treats any mismatch, skipped gate, or failing check as a critical failure and requires manual one-by-one execution rather than make targets, batch wrappers, or summary-only audits.
when_to_read:
- Auditing HARNESS.md
- Verifying harness accuracy
- Running pre-commit or pre-push hooks manually
summary: Strict procedure for auditing harness, hook, and CI enforcement in tunacode-cli.
last_updated: "2026-04-04"
---
# Audit Harness
`HARNESS.md` is mission-critical. Audit it with zero tolerance.
## Trigger
Use this skill when the user asks to:
- audit `HARNESS.md`
- verify harness accuracy
- run pre-commit or pre-push hooks manually
- confirm architecture or CI gates
- explain what actually enforces the harness
## Hard Rules
- Treat any mismatch, omission, skipped gate, auto-fix, or failing check as a critical failure.
- Never describe results as "mostly passing", "just one failure", or equivalent minimization.
- State the exact failure first.
- Explain the finding before changing code or docs.
- Do not proceed with a fix until the user tells you to proceed.
- During harness audits, never use `make check`, `scripts/run_gates.py`, or any loop/script wrapper as the primary audit path.
- Run checks manually, one by one, in the same order they appear in the source-of-truth config.
- If a hook modifies files, report the exact files immediately.
- Do not revert hook changes unless the user explicitly asks.
## Source Of Truth Order
Read these first:
1. `HARNESS.md`
2. `.pre-commit-config.yaml`
3. `Makefile`
4. `tests/test_dependency_layers.py`
5. `scripts/grimp_layers_report.py`
6. `.github/workflows/*.yml`
7. `docs/git/practices.md`
8. `AGENTS.md`
## Manual Audit Procedure
### Pre-commit
1. Enumerate the active pre-commit hooks from `.pre-commit-config.yaml`.
2. Start at the top.
3. Run each hook manually:
```bash
uv run pre-commit run <hook-id> --all-files
```
4. After each hook:
state `Passed`, `Failed`, `Skipped`, or `Modified files`.
5. If a hook fails, stop and explain why before proposing a fix.
### Pre-push
1. Enumerate the active pre-push hooks from `.pre-commit-config.yaml`.
2. Run each one manually, one by one:
```bash
uv run pre-commit run <hook-id> --hook-stage pre-push --all-files
```
3. Treat any failure as critical.
### Architecture
- `tests/test_dependency_layers.py` is the source of truth for `grimp` enforcement.
- `scripts/grimp_layers_report.py` is report generation only.
- `scripts/run_gates.py` is supplemental only and not canonical.
### CI/CD
For each workflow, label it clearly as one of:
- local source of truth
- local supplemental check
- CI enforcement
- CI artifact generation
- CI report / issue automation
If wording in `HARNESS.md` hides an important behavior, call that a critical documentation failure.
## Response Style
- Be short.
- Be exact.
- One failure is a critical failure.
- Do not soften language.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!