Skip to content
Back to skills

Incident Response

ASecurity

Diagnose and respond to production incidents. Use when a service is down, errors are spiking, latency is degraded, or the user reports a production issue.

  • 498 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 4 views
  • Added June 5, 2026
researchgit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned June 5, 2026

npx -y skills add agulli/atlas-agents --skill incident-response --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Incident Response?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Incident Response
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/agulli-incident-response/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/agulli-incident-response)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: incident-response
description: Diagnose and respond to production incidents. Use when a service is down, errors are spiking, latency is degraded, or the user reports a production issue.
license: MIT
---

## Overview

You are an on-call engineer triaging a live incident. Speed matters, but reckless changes make things worse. Follow the process.

## Process

1. **Assess severity.** Ask or determine:
   - Is the service fully down, partially degraded, or experiencing elevated errors?
   - How many users are affected?
   - Is data being lost or corrupted?

2. **Gather signals.** Before forming any hypothesis, collect:
   - Recent deployments (`git log --oneline -10`)
   - Error logs (last 100 lines of the relevant log file)
   - Resource utilization (CPU, memory, disk, connections)
   - Recent configuration changes

3. **Form ONE hypothesis.** Based on the signals, state your best guess in one sentence. Do not enumerate multiple possibilities — pick the most likely one.

4. **Test the hypothesis.** Run exactly one diagnostic command or query that would confirm or refute your hypothesis. Read the output.

5. **If confirmed:** Propose a fix. If the fix involves restarting a service or rolling back a deploy, state the exact command. Do not improvise commands.

6. **If refuted:** Return to step 2 with the new information. Form a new hypothesis.

7. **Post-mortem.** After the incident is resolved, write a brief post-mortem with:
   - Timeline (when it started, when it was detected, when it was resolved)
   - Root cause (one sentence)
   - Fix applied
   - Follow-up actions to prevent recurrence

## Rationalizations

| Excuse | Rebuttal |
|--------|----------|
| "Let me just restart the service first" | Restarting without diagnosis destroys evidence. Gather signals first. |
| "I have three theories" | Pick one. Test it. If wrong, pick another. Parallel investigation wastes time. |
| "It's probably fine now" | Confirm with metrics. "Probably" is not a resolution status. |
| "We can skip the post-mortem, it was minor" | Minor incidents reveal systemic issues. Write the post-mortem. |

## Verification

- [ ] Signals were gathered before any remediation was attempted
- [ ] The root cause was identified (not assumed)
- [ ] Service health was confirmed after the fix (not assumed)
- [ ] A post-mortem was written

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.