Research

Synthesize qualitative and quantitative user research into structured insights and opportunity areas. Use when analyzing interview notes, survey responses, support tickets, or behavioral data to identify themes, build personas, or prioritize opportunities.

Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.

Verify claims, identify misinformation, and assess source credibility

Deep-dive analysis of GitHub projects. Use when the user mentions a GitHub repo/project name and wants to understand it — triggered by phrases like "帮我看看这个项目", "了解一下 XXX", "这个项目怎么样", "分析一下 repo", or any request to explore/evaluate a GitHub project. Covers architecture, community health, competitive landscape, and cross-platform knowledge sources.

Conduct enterprise-grade research with multi-source synthesis, citation tracking, and verification. Use when user needs comprehensive analysis requiring 10+ sources, verified claims, or comparison of approaches. Triggers include "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", or "analyze trends". Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.

Comprehensive framework for deep analysis of articles, papers, and long-form content using 10+ thinking models (SCQA, 5W2H, critical thinking, inversion, mental models, first principles, systems thinking, six thinking hats). Use when users want to: (1) deeply understand complex articles/content, (2) analyze arguments and identify logical flaws, (3) extract actionable insights from reading materials, (4) create study notes or learning summaries, (5) compare multiple sources, (6) transform know...

Forensic audit of the user's recent Claude Code sessions to surface step-change workflow improvements — not marginal ones. Use when the user asks to "audit my Claude Code sessions", "analyze how I use Claude Code", "find patterns in my usage", "improve my Claude Code workflow", "review my sessions", "find leverage in my setup", or wants to understand where their Claude Code setup is leaking time. Samples dozens of real transcripts, extracts quantitative signal via scripts, uses parallel subag...

Research any topic from the last 30 days on Reddit + X + Web, synthesize findings, and write copy-paste-ready prompts. Use when the user wants recent social/web research on a topic, asks "what are people saying about X", or wants to learn current best practices. Requires OPENAI_API_KEY and/or XAI_API_KEY for full Reddit+X access, falls back to web search.

Daily wisdom review applying Charlie Munger's mental models to your work and thinking. Use when asked to review decisions, analyze thinking patterns, detect biases, apply mental models, do a "Munger review", or run the Munger Observer. Triggers on scheduled daily reviews or manual requests like "run munger observer", "review my thinking", "check for blind spots", or "apply mental models".

Invoke when the user wants to plan, execute, or analyze a structured playtest session with behavioral observation. Covers protocol design, observer guides, and data synthesis. Triggers on: "playtest", "player feedback", "usability test", "observation session", "playtest analysis". Do NOT invoke for QA bug testing (use game-qa-lead) or balance tuning (use game-balance-check). Part of the AlterLab GameForge collection.

Conduct market research for a game concept -- competitive landscape, market sizing, audience analysis, trend detection, and positioning strategy. Triggers on: "market research", "competitive analysis", "market sizing", "audience analysis", "is this game viable", "similar games", "market validation". Do NOT invoke for brainstorming ideas (use game-brainstorm) or economy monetization design (use game-economy-designer). Part of the AlterLab GameForge collection.

Use Business Adventures for "why did this fail?", "analyze this crisis", "what pattern applies?", or "what would Brooks notice?"

Run a 6-agent pre-submission referee report for an academic paper targeting a specified journal. Covers spelling/style, internal consistency, unsupported claims, math/notation, tables/figures, and an adversarial top-journal referee evaluation. Supports marketing (MKSCI, JMR, JCR, MS) and economics/finance journals.

Drafts an R&R response letter in the user's R2R style — sectioned by role (Senior Editor / Associate Editor / Reviewer 1 / Reviewer 2), reviewer quotes in `\textit{...}`, location-pinned changes ("see Section 3", "Footnote 7", "Table 4"), "Done." for trivial fixes, polite pushback with cited authority, abandoned drafts kept in `\begin{comment}` blocks. Reads existing `R2R_*.tex` files in the project for tone match and grounds every location pin against the actual `main*.tex`. Use whenever the...

Draft a structured preregistration document (AsPredicted, OSF, or AEA RCT Registry style) from a study spec or free-form description, annotated with MUST / SHOULD / MAY clarity flags. Use when the user says "preregister", "draft a preregistration", "OSF preregistration", "AsPredicted form", "AEA RCT registry", "PAP", "preanalysis plan", or before launching an online experiment, conjoint, vignette study, eye-tracking session, or any data collection / confirmatory analysis they have not yet see...

Runs a structured multi-source literature search across arXiv, Semantic Scholar, and OpenAlex MCPs (with Crossref as fallback), dedupes by DOI / arXiv-ID / fuzzy title, scores each unique paper 1–5 for relevance to the user's query, and returns a ranked summarized list with takeaways framed for a quantitative marketing audience. Use this skill whenever the user asks to "find papers on X", "do a lit review on Y", "what's the literature on Z", "any recent work on W", "find references for my pap...

Audit an existing .bib file entry-by-entry against ground truth (DOI, Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, arXiv) to catch the silent citation errors that pass spell-check but kill peer review — wrong year, mis-cited authors, wrong journal/volume, swapped title-author pairs, fabricated DOIs, and outright hallucinated entries (a real concern with LLM-assisted drafting). Spawns one narrow-focus subagent per entry so each citation gets full attention rather than the gradient-decay that single-pass audits...

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses. Operationalizes Richards Heuer's CIA-tradition technique for systematically narrowing among multiple hypotheses against evidence. Builds an explicit hypothesis-vs-evidence matrix and focuses on disconfirmation rather than confirmation — the central insight: hypotheses cannot be proven, only disconfirmed; the surviving hypothesis is the one with the least disconfirming evidence. Spawns parallel hypothesizers (in isolation, across hypothesis-generation angles) ...

深度研究工具。接收用户的研究主题，分析请求、生成研究提示词， 用户确认后执行多源网络搜索（覆盖中英文主流平台和社交媒体）， 最终产出带引用链接的结构化 Markdown 研究报告并保存。 当用户说"深度研究"、"帮我研究一下"、"deep research"、"调研一下"、"调研"时触发。

迭代复盘——读状态机历史出趋势报告

Find current info, cite URLs

Distill complex topics into layered, actionable summaries. Start with the key insight, layer in detail, end with recommended next action.

Conceptual and semantic web search; cite sources

Conduct market research, competitive analysis, investor due diligence, and industry intelligence with source attribution and decision-oriented summaries. Use when the user wants market sizing, competitor comparisons, fund research, technology scans, or research that informs business decisions.