Research

Interactive agent picker for composing and dispatching parallel teams from agent persona files.

Search guidance and output contract for the Research employee. Read-only codebase exploration, uncertainty reduction, structured reports.

Research across Notion and synthesize into structured documentation; use when gathering info from multiple Notion sources to produce briefs, comparisons, or reports with citations.

Conduct market research, competitive analysis, investor due diligence, and industry intelligence with source attribution and decision-oriented summaries. Use when the user wants market sizing, competitor comparisons, fund research, technology scans, or research that informs business decisions.

Use this skill when the user wants to create an academic paper, research paper, white paper, technical report, policy brief, or any formally structured document with TOC, equations, footnotes, endnotes, or scholarly formatting. Trigger on: 'academic paper', 'research paper', 'white paper', 'technical report', 'policy brief', 'journal paper', 'scholarly document', 'paper with equations', 'paper with footnotes', 'paper with TOC', 'manuscript', 'conference paper'. Output is always a single .docx...

Run autonomous multi-step research via Google Gemini Deep Research Agent. Produces cited reports from web sources.

Use when building a probate document checklist and missing-document list for attorney review, without preparing filing-ready probate forms.

Use when reviewing the tax covenants and indemnities of a transaction agreement and mapping their architecture and negotiation issues for tax counsel verification.

Use when issue-spotting cross-border tax questions into a source-cited issue map and missing-facts list for tax counsel, without concluding treaty, withholding, PE, or CFC/PFIC treatment.

Use when organizing entity formation, ownership, and election facts into a source-cited facts table so qualified tax counsel can evaluate tax classification.

Use when issue-spotting zoning, permitted-use, recorded-restriction, and use-clause concerns from provided materials and producing questions for local counsel.

Use when reviewing tenant or landlord estoppel certificates, SNDAs, and recognition agreements, and comparing them against the lease where provided.

Use when comparing the representations and warranties in an M&A purchase agreement against the disclosure schedules to surface gaps, mismatches, and unresolved items for attorney review.

Use when producing a structured brief of a single judicial opinion for attorney review, extracting the facts, procedural posture, issue, holding, reasoning, rule, and weight in a fixed template — with every slot tied to a specific passage in the provided opinion and the case verified against `connectors/courtlistener.md` where applicable.

Use when synthesizing a rule statement from multiple judicial opinions (and, where relevant, statutory or secondary sources) for a single Question Presented, producing a structured synthesis with explicit majority-and-minority handling, a temporal-confidence pass for older authority, and a Holding / Relevance / Weight block per authority — capped at the smallest set that supports the rule.

Use when applying a disciplined analytical method to parse and interpret a statutory, regulatory, or contractual provision — mapping structure, defined terms, and competing readings — to produce a structured interpretation worksheet for attorney review.

Use when stress-testing draft legal work product for hallucination risk by separating factual claims, legal claims, cited authorities, user-provided information, model-generated information, unsupported claims, uncertainty, and safer revisions.

Use when reviewing legal citations, authorities, quotations, and authority-backed propositions to classify citation source status, flag unverifiable or malformed authorities, and prepare attorney verification items without claiming automated legal citation verification.

Use when extracting and auditing explicit assumptions, hidden assumptions, missing facts, missing documents, jurisdiction gaps, deadline gaps, client-role ambiguity, escalation items, business decision points, and professional-responsibility concerns in draft legal work product.

Use when reviewing certificates of insurance and related endorsements against contract insurance requirements into a source-cited comparison table for attorney review.

Use when reviewing sanctions, PEP, or adverse-media screening results for named parties to compare identifiers, classify each potential match by confidence, separate likely false positives from genuine hits, and recommend a disposition for compliance and attorney review.

Use when building a hearing-preparation checklist for a family law hearing — pleadings, declarations, exhibits, disclosures, witnesses, and open questions — for attorney review.

Use when organizing family-law discovery requests, responses, disclosures, subpoenas, authorizations, deficiencies, and meet-and-confer items into a tracker for attorney review.

Use when building a source-cited property and debt schedule from user-provided facts and documents for a family law matter, for attorney review.