
Claude Skills by sunyifeisb-art
github.com/sunyifeisb-artEnsures a sale objection analysis applies the governing legal standard to each argument, checks contract-based cure-period and damages issues against the operative agreement and applicable law, evaluates break-up fee objections under the appropriate business-judgment framework, analyzes insider allegations under the relevant insider definition, assesses standing, and contextualizes any requested delay against the transaction timeline and financing milestones.
Ensures an APA issue memo identifies buyer-favorable deviations from § 363 sale market standards, including sale-order approval conditions, marketing restrictions, outside-date feasibility, environmental successor-liability allocation, knowledge-qualified representations, governing-forum provisions, and purchase-price allocation issues, and supports each with a proceeds waterfall showing creditor recovery.
Ensures a DIP credit agreement issue memo systematically analyzes claim elevation mechanics, investigation-period adequacy, carve-out sufficiency, avoidance-action lien coverage, MAC clause breadth, lender conflicts, and related budget and financing terms, with proposed modification language for each issue.
Ensures a plan issues memo checks the plan’s internal consistency, tests economic assumptions and classifications against the supporting materials, identifies confirmation-related defects and disclosure gaps, and ends with a cumulative feasibility-oriented risk assessment rather than only isolated issues.
Ensures an RSA issues memo for a subordinated secured creditor identifies and compares class-by-class recoveries, analyzes priority and allocation issues, evaluates plan support mechanics and dilution effects, assesses any termination-fee or similar incentive structure, and considers the implications of intercreditor and standstill terms.
Ensures a stalking horse asset purchase agreement issues memo consistently applies four analytical elements to each issue — problem identification, legal or contractual basis, impact on the estate, and recommended resolution — with attention to environmental successor-liability risk, material adverse effect carve-out gaps, and alignment between closing deadlines and financing milestones.
Ensures a preference exposure review memo checks the preparer's calculations, identifies transfers that may be subject to extended look-back treatment, applies the correct limitations period for avoidance actions, and confirms that only qualifying post-transfer new value is credited.
Ensures a distressed credit facility review memo identifies collateral-package scope issues, tests whether any proposed debtor-in-possession financing or similar rescue financing is practically and contractually feasible against the facility it is intended to address, and calculates any standstill or forbearance expiration as a restructuring deadline.
Ensures a distressed credit facility review applies the same structural analyses as the related scenario class — pledge limitation scope, financing pre-consent feasibility, standstill expiration, cross-agreement change-of-control triggers, and any joint-venture put option cross-reference — while keeping the analysis procedural and document-driven.
Redline analysis where the baseline omits a systematic risk-shift narrative, issue severity ratings, and the playbook-grounded rationale needed for a negotiation-ready memo.
Three-document cross-check where the baseline typically performs only pairwise comparisons and misses conflicts that surface only when all three documents are read together.
Checklist-driven closing review where the baseline misses document-level defects such as mismatched parties, stale certificates, identifier mismatches, and similar defects, and fails to produce a severity-tiered remediation plan.
Year-over-year annual report comparison memo where the baseline identifies numerical changes but misses disclosure triggers and related compliance analysis that the partner's instructions require.
Registration statement staleness review that compares a draft against prior filings, checks intervening disclosures for material updates, and evaluates whether the filing remains internally consistent and procedurally complete.
S-1 form check for a registration statement where the baseline identifies surface-level omissions but does not fully test internal consistency of financial tables, ownership disclosures, dilution computations, and other structure-dependent disclosures against the supporting record.
Form 10-K drafting task with a companion issues memo required, where the baseline drafts narrative from individual source documents without reconciling cross-document discrepancies or flagging open items for company input.
Comfort letter request drafting where the baseline fails to differentiate the procedures available for each type of financial period and does not address the privity and addressee rules that govern who may receive the letter.
Form 8-K drafting task focused on identifying all triggered items from a reported transaction, drafting each item with the required disclosures, and preparing a cover memorandum that flags discrepancies, inconsistencies, or arithmetic errors in the source materials.
Equity incentive plan drafting where the baseline produces a plan document but omits a companion drafting memo resolving conflicts among multiple source documents and flagging statutory, governance, and capitalization nuances.
High-yield indenture drafting from a precedent and multiple deal documents, requiring a companion issues memo that resolves cross-document discrepancies in economic terms and covenant definitions.
ICFR policy drafting from multiple source documents identifying distinct weaknesses, requiring a COSO-mapped policy that remediates each weakness and includes an implementation timeline.
Closing opinion letter for a Rule 144A / Regulation S offering where the baseline adapts a model template but does not resolve cross-document discrepancies embedded in the opinion's assumptions or address missing closing deliverables.
Purchaser-perspective indenture markup where the baseline redlines obvious economic deviations from the playbook but may miss additional purchaser-protective structural provisions that experienced counsel commonly add.
Issuer-perspective underwriting agreement markup where the baseline redlines identify deviations from the playbook and document the basis for each change without converting the skill into an answer key.
Comprehensive proxy statement drafting from multiple source documents where the baseline produces the core disclosure sections but may miss additional disclosure obligations arising from the company’s governance and compensation profile.
DEF 14A proxy statement drafting for an annual meeting with a contested director election; the baseline produces standard narrative sections but does not fully verify tabular consistency, shareholder-proposal handling, or governance disclosures tied to the company’s specific profile.
Form 10-Q drafting from multiple source documents where the baseline populates standard sections but may miss disclosure obligations triggered by events during the quarter, such as acquisitions, regulatory matters, workforce changes, system migrations, or subsequent events.
Form S-1 drafting where the baseline produces a structurally complete prospectus but does not apply structure-specific disclosure requirements or produce the companion issues memo identifying cross-document discrepancies.
SEC comment letter response drafting where the baseline addresses each comment narratively but omits the standard representation, draft-ready proposed disclosure language, and the privileged internal strategy memo.
Firm-commitment underwriting agreement drafting for an IPO where the baseline populates economic terms but omits deal-specific provisions required by the transaction structure and source documents, and does not produce the companion issues memo.
Financial statement extraction for a debt offering where the baseline extracts individual line items but does not cross-reference them against the offering materials and financing documents to surface discrepancies and required disclosure enhancements.
Financial statement extraction for a debt offering — use the same analytical framework as the base scenario, and extend it to extract and verify the proposed offering terms stated in the offering memorandum.
Section 16 filing extraction where the baseline captures reported transaction data, but the workflow also checks arithmetic consistency, ownership computations, timing, indirect ownership, derivative terms, and potential short-swing exposure at a procedural level.
Underwriting agreement term extraction where the baseline captures core economics but may miss cross-document discrepancies, non-standard provisions, and exhibit completeness gaps.
DD request list gap analysis for a pre-IPO company where the baseline identifies generic omissions but does not connect each gap to the specific disclosure obligation or underwriter diligence standard it is meant to satisfy.
DD request list gap analysis — same framework as the base scenario, extended to address subsidiary dissolution records, jurisdiction-specific dissolution requirements, and clinical hold history as distinct diligence gaps.
High-yield indenture issue analysis for a proposed dividend recapitalization, focusing on covenant restrictions, basket availability, calculation checks, and drafting ambiguities that may create structural risk.
Underwriting agreement issue identification where the baseline lists concerns but does not cite the specific agreement section for each issue or provide sufficiently precise redline instructions for the negotiating team to act on.
Form 10-K compliance review where the baseline catches missing narrative sections but misses required items and exhibits introduced by later rule changes, and does not apply the correct filing deadline calculation.
Insider trading policy compliance review focused on identifying gaps in a corporate policy against the applicable insider trading rule set and related public-disclosure obligations, without assuming the baseline analysis is complete.
Form 10-Q compliance review where the baseline catches missing narrative sections but misses required financial statement components, disclosure deficiencies in transaction-specific notes, and the controls effectiveness conclusion requirement.
Form 8-K compliance review where the baseline identifies triggered Items but misses exhibit-level deficiencies, cover page accuracy issues, and ancillary filing obligations created by the reported transaction.
Proxy statement form-compliance review where the baseline identifies visible disclosure gaps but may miss recently required disclosures, shareholder-proposal handling requirements, and procedural notice obligations.
Form 10-Q compliance review focused on checking whether the filing’s cover page, financial statements, and MD&A disclosures follow the required form and whether period-specific disclosure items are handled consistently with the applicable accounting and SEC framework.
Gap analysis of a healthcare organization’s privacy and security compliance program, identifying deficiencies in administrative safeguards, breach notification procedures, and vendor oversight against applicable healthcare privacy and security requirements.
Gap analysis of AI systems operated by an autonomous vehicle provider against the EU AI Act high-risk classification framework, technical obligations, and conformity assessment pathways.
Gap analysis comparing current employee exempt classifications against applicable salary thresholds and duties tests, identifying potentially misclassified positions and producing procedural remediation planning with prospective and retrospective exposure analysis.
Gap analysis of a public company's climate-related disclosures and reporting infrastructure against applicable climate-related disclosure requirements, covering board governance, greenhouse gas emissions, severe weather financial effects, and attestation obligations.
Compliance timeline assessment identifying obligations, errors, and gaps across multiple new SEC reporting requirements, including filer status classification, cybersecurity disclosures, and executive compensation clawback rules, using general rule-based analysis rather than scenario-specific conclusions.
Board-ready compliance timeline memorandum for a newly enacted state wage theft prevention statute, analyzing worker classification risks, wage notice and pay stub obligations, multilingual posting requirements, and third-party staffing liability