Claude Skills by mukul975

Guides compliance with South Korea's Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA, 개인정보 보호법). Covers pseudonymisation framework, notification requirements, PIPC enforcement, consent standards, and cross-border transfer rules under the 2023 amendments. Keywords: PIPA, Korea data protection, PIPC, pseudonymisation, consent, cross-border transfers.

Guides determination of the correct lawful basis under GDPR Article 6(1)(a)-(f) for each processing activity. Includes decision tree logic for consent vs legitimate interest vs contract necessity. Activate when evaluating legal grounds for processing or reviewing lawful basis selections. Keywords: lawful basis, Article 6, consent, legitimate interest, legal obligation, contract.

Decision framework for choosing between consent and legitimate interest as the lawful basis for processing. Covers power imbalance indicators, conditionality prohibition under Article 7(4), granularity requirements, the three-part LIA test (purpose, necessity, balancing), and practical decision trees for common scenarios.

Guides the three-part Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) required under GDPR Article 6(1)(f): purpose test, necessity test, and balancing test. Activate when evaluating legitimate interest as a lawful basis, conducting LIA reviews, or documenting proportionality analysis. Keywords: LIA, legitimate interest, balancing test, necessity test, purpose test, Article 6(1)(f).

Conduct LINDDUN privacy threat modeling across all seven categories: Linking, Identifying, Non-repudiation, Detecting, Data Disclosure, Unawareness, and Non-compliance. Includes DFD-based analysis, threat trees, privacy-specific mitigation strategies, and integration with STRIDE security threat modeling.

Manages legal hold and data preservation processes including triggering events, custodian notification, hold-in-place technical implementation, release procedures, and interaction with retention schedules. Covers litigation hold registers, compliance monitoring, and Art. 17(3)(e) exception documentation. Activate for legal hold, litigation preservation, data freeze, e-discovery hold queries.

Assessing privacy risks in large language model outputs including training data memorisation, PII leakage in generated text, prompt injection leading to data extraction, and hallucinated personal data. Covers output filtering, guardrails, and monitoring. Keywords: LLM privacy, output risk, memorisation, PII leakage, prompt injection, hallucinated PII.

Guide for managing consent for children's personal data under GDPR Article 8 and COPPA. Covers parental consent mechanisms, age verification methods, country-specific age thresholds (ranging from 13 to 16), parental authorization workflows, and age-appropriate design per the UK ICO Children's Code.

Guide for managing consent for scientific research under GDPR Article 89 and Recital 33 broad consent provisions. Covers ethical review board coordination, purpose evolution management, appropriate safeguards including pseudonymization, and the interplay between consent and other lawful bases for research processing.

Guide for mobile-specific consent management covering Apple ATT framework for iOS, Android permission model, in-app consent flows, SDK consent propagation to third-party libraries, and IDFA/GAID handling. Addresses platform-specific requirements alongside GDPR and ePrivacy compliance for mobile applications.

Guides DPIA for marketing profiling, behavioural targeting, cross-device tracking, and advertising analytics. Covers ePrivacy Directive Art. 5(3) cookie consent, PECR regulations, legitimate interest balancing for direct marketing, and adtech processing chain assessment. Keywords: marketing analytics, DPIA, profiling, behavioural targeting, cross-device tracking, ePrivacy, PECR, adtech, legitimate interest.

Manages the absolute right to object to direct marketing under GDPR Article 21(2)-(3), covering immediate cessation of all direct marketing processing, suppression list management, cross-channel enforcement, and profiling for marketing purposes. Activate for marketing opt-out, unsubscribe, Art. 21(2), direct marketing objection queries.

Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act (MTDPA) compliance. Lowest consumer threshold at 50,000 consumers. Covers sensitive data consent, universal opt-out recognition, consumer rights, controller obligations, 60-day cure period, and AG enforcement. Effective October 1, 2024.

Guides building a multi-jurisdiction privacy compliance matrix for organisations operating across multiple countries. Covers common requirements identification, jurisdiction-specific deltas, gap analysis, and harmonised control frameworks. Keywords: multi-jurisdiction, compliance matrix, harmonised controls, gap analysis, jurisdiction mapping.

Multi-state harmonized privacy compliance program. Common requirements matrix across all US state privacy laws, state-specific deltas, unified privacy program architecture, and implementation strategy for operating across California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, Texas, Oregon, Montana, and Kentucky.

New Jersey Data Privacy Act (NJDPA) compliance, effective January 15, 2025. Covers consumer rights (access, correction, deletion, portability, opt-out), controller obligations, sensitive data requirements, universal opt-out mechanism recognition, 30-day cure period (sunsets after 18 months), and AG enforcement. Keywords: NJDPA, New Jersey, data privacy, consumer rights, sensitive data, universal opt-out, AG enforcement.

Guides privacy impact assessment for emerging technologies including IoT, blockchain, AR/VR, quantum computing, and digital twins. Covers risk identification methodology, proportionality assessment, and technology-specific privacy challenges. Activate when evaluating new technology adoption, innovation projects, or emerging tech procurement. Keywords: PIA, emerging technology, IoT, blockchain, AR/VR, quantum computing, digital twins, innovation privacy.

Nigeria Data Protection Regulation (NDPR) and Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) 2023 compliance. Covers lawful basis for processing, data subject rights, cross-border transfer mechanisms, Data Protection Compliance Organisation (DPCO) registration, mandatory DPIA filing, and breach notification. Keywords: NDPR, NDPA, Nigeria, NITDA, DPCO, Africa data protection, cross-border transfer.

Implement the NIST Privacy Framework COMMUNICATE function covering CM.AW awareness raising and CM.PO communication policies. Provides transparency mechanisms, stakeholder engagement frameworks, privacy notice templates, and communication workflow guidance.

Implement the NIST Privacy Framework CONTROL function covering CT.DM data management, CT.DP data processing policies and procedures, and CT.PO disassociated processing. Provides technical control architectures, data management workflows, and de-identification implementation guidance.

Implement the NIST Privacy Framework GOVERN function covering GV.AT awareness and training, GV.MT monitoring and review, GV.PO policy development, and GV.RR roles and responsibilities. Provides governance structure templates, training programs, and accountability frameworks for privacy governance.

Implement the NIST Privacy Framework IDENTIFY function including ID.BE business environment, ID.DA data actions, ID.IM improvement, and ID.RA risk assessment subcategories. Provides control mapping, gap analysis templates, and implementation workflows for privacy risk identification.

Implement the NIST Privacy Framework PROTECT function covering PR.AC access control, PR.DS data security, and PR.PO protective policies. Provides technical control implementation guidance, encryption standards, access management architectures, and security-privacy integration patterns.

Guides implementation of the NIST Privacy Framework IDENTIFY function covering ID.BE business environment, ID.DA data actions, ID.IM improvement, and ID.RA risk assessment subcategories. Maps NIST PF controls to GDPR requirements for dual-framework compliance. Keywords: NIST Privacy Framework, IDENTIFY function, ID.BE, ID.DA, ID.IM, ID.RA, privacy risk assessment, data actions.

Oregon Consumer Privacy Act (OCPA) compliance. Unique provisions for de-identified data requirements, employee data partial exemption, nonprofit applicability, 14-day cure period, and consumer rights. Effective July 1, 2024. AG enforcement only.

Classifies personal vs non-personal data per GDPR Art. 4(1) definition test with decision tree for borderline cases. References Breyer v Germany CJEU C-582/14 dynamic IP ruling and WP29 Opinion 4/2007. Keywords: personal data, GDPR Art 4, data classification, Breyer ruling, identifiability test, PII.

Conducts Privacy Impact Assessment for health data processing under GDPR Article 9, HIPAA, and sector-specific health privacy regulations. Covers special category data safeguards, clinical research data, patient portals, health wearables, genetic data, and cross-border health data transfers. Keywords: health data PIA, DPIA, Article 9, HIPAA, special category data, clinical research, patient privacy, genetic data.

Conducts Privacy Impact Assessment for large-scale systematic monitoring under GDPR Article 35(3)(c). Covers CCTV and video surveillance, employee monitoring, location tracking, internet monitoring, and behavioural analytics. Applies EDPB WP248rev.01 criteria for systematic monitoring of publicly accessible areas. Keywords: DPIA, large-scale monitoring, CCTV, employee monitoring, systematic monitoring, surveillance, location tracking.

Guides the periodic DPIA review lifecycle including trigger identification for regulatory changes, new data categories, technology changes, and breach incidents. Covers version control, stakeholder sign-off procedures, and DPIA register management per Art. 35(11). Keywords: DPIA review, PIA update, review cadence, version control, Art. 35(11), periodic review, trigger events, stakeholder sign-off.

Conducts pre-DPIA threshold screening to determine whether a full Data Protection Impact Assessment is required under GDPR Article 35. Applies the EDPB WP248rev.01 nine-criteria test, national supervisory authority blacklists, and organisational risk appetite to produce a documented screening decision. Keywords: threshold screening, DPIA trigger, pre-DPIA, WP248, Article 35(1), blacklist, screening decision.

Conducts Privacy Impact Assessment for vendor and third-party data processing arrangements. Covers processor due diligence, Data Processing Agreement (DPA) requirements under GDPR Article 28, sub-processor management, cross-border vendor transfers, cloud service provider assessments, and ongoing vendor monitoring. Keywords: vendor PIA, processor assessment, DPA, Article 28, sub-processor, cloud privacy, third-party risk.

Build automated PII detection and redaction pipelines using spaCy NER, Microsoft Presidio, and AWS Macie integration. Includes confidence scoring, custom entity type definitions, batch processing workflows, and multi-format document scanning for structured and unstructured data sources.

Detects PII in unstructured data including emails, documents, images, and logs using NER-based detection with spaCy and Microsoft Presidio, regex patterns, OCR integration, and confidence scoring. Keywords: PII detection, unstructured data, NER, spaCy, Presidio, OCR, regex, email scanning, document scanning.

Preparation guide for ISO 31700 privacy by design for consumer goods certification. Covers the 30 requirements across design, production, and disposal phases. Includes gap assessment methodology, remediation planning, and mapping to GDPR Article 25 data protection by design obligations for consumer-facing products and services.

Guides the Art. 36 prior consultation process when a DPIA indicates high residual risk that cannot be mitigated. Covers required documentation per Art. 36(3), the 8-week DPA response timeline, outcome management, and interaction protocols with supervisory authorities. Keywords: prior consultation, Art. 36, supervisory authority, DPA, high residual risk, DPIA escalation, consultation documentation.

Design privacy API patterns including data subject API for DSAR endpoints, consent API for preference management, deletion API with cascading delete orchestration, and audit API for compliance reporting. Provides OpenAPI specifications, error handling, rate limiting, and authentication patterns.

Build privacy-preserving data sharing platforms using synthetic data generation with the SDV library, data clean rooms, secure enclaves, and utility measurement. Covers end-to-end architecture for sharing analytical datasets while preserving individual privacy guarantees.

Guides conducting privacy law gap analysis for market entry into new jurisdictions. Covers target jurisdiction assessment, existing compliance mapping, remediation effort estimation, and implementation timeline planning. Keywords: gap analysis, market entry, jurisdiction assessment, remediation planning, compliance mapping.

Guides privacy law change monitoring and impact assessment for multi-jurisdiction organisations. Covers regulatory tracking sources, change classification, impact scoring methodology, and implementation prioritisation. Keywords: law monitoring, regulatory tracking, change management, impact assessment, implementation priority.

Guides privacy program maturity assessment using the AICPA/CIPT Privacy Maturity Model with five levels: Ad Hoc, Repeating, Defined, Managed, and Optimized. Covers assessment methodology across ten privacy domains, scoring criteria, gap analysis, maturity roadmap generation, and benchmarking against industry peers. Keywords: privacy maturity, AICPA, maturity model, assessment, roadmap, benchmarking.

Build privacy KPI dashboards tracking DSAR volume and response time, breach count and severity, DPIA completion rate, training coverage, and consent rates. Includes metric definitions, data collection patterns, visualization designs, and executive reporting templates for privacy program measurement.

Guides privacy program effectiveness measurement including leading and lagging indicators, KPI definition, benchmarking methodology, executive reporting formats, board-level privacy dashboards, and metric-driven program improvement. Covers operational, compliance, risk, and strategic privacy metrics across the program lifecycle. Keywords: privacy metrics, KPIs, benchmarking, executive reporting, dashboard, program effectiveness.

Implement privacy-preserving record linkage across datasets using Bloom filter encoding, secure hash matching, threshold tuning for precision and recall, and false positive management. Enables entity resolution without exposing raw personally identifiable information between parties.

Guides the Privacy Threshold Analysis screening process to determine whether a full DPIA is required. Provides a quick-screen questionnaire, threshold criteria based on WP248rev.01, escalation triggers, and documentation requirements. Activate when evaluating new processing activities, system changes, or procurement decisions. Keywords: PTA, privacy threshold analysis, DPIA screening, quick-screen, threshold criteria, WP248, escalation triggers.

Creates GDPR Article 30(2) Records of Processing Activities for data processors with all four mandatory fields: processor and controller names and contact details, categories of processing, third country transfers, and security measures description. Activate for processor RoPA, Art. 30(2), processor records, sub-processor documentation.

Classifies data as pseudonymised or anonymised using Recital 26 reasonably likely test, Breyer ruling C-582/14, motivated intruder test, and WP29 Opinion 05/2014 on anonymisation techniques. Covers singling out, linkability, and inference tests. Keywords: pseudonymisation, anonymisation, Recital 26, re-identification, k-anonymity, differential privacy, WP29 Opinion 05/2014.

Assessment of pseudonymization techniques and re-identification risk. Covers tokenization, hashing, encryption-based pseudonymization, and hybrid approaches. Includes re-identification risk scoring using the motivated intruder test, quantitative metrics (marketer, journalist, prosecutor models), and linkage attack resilience evaluation. References ENISA 2019 pseudonymization report.

Design and implement Purpose-Based Access Control (PBAC) architecture including purpose ontology definition, policy engine configuration, audit logging of purpose verification at query time, and integration with existing IAM systems. Enforces GDPR Article 5(1)(b) purpose limitation technically.

Manages responses to regulatory complaints lodged with supervisory authorities under GDPR Article 77, covering internal escalation procedures, DPA response coordination, remediation tracking, and compliance documentation. Activate for regulatory complaint, supervisory authority complaint, Art. 77, DPA response, ICO complaint queries.

Establishes boundaries for monitoring remote and hybrid workers including screen capture, productivity tracking, camera and microphone activation, attendance verification, and activity logging. Applies proportionality principles, transparency requirements, and evaluates less intrusive alternatives per EDPB and national DPA guidance. Keywords: remote work, monitoring, screen capture, productivity tracking, webcam, home office, hybrid work, proportionality, surveillance.