All authors
Claude Skills by malekokour
github.com/malekokour152 skills0 installs181 views
- Review Model Analysis Plan And ReportReviews a model analysis plan for whether it constrains the analysis, and a model analysis report against the plan that governed it. It classifies every pre-specified element as followed, deviated-and-declared, deviated-and-undeclared or not-addressed, identifies which decisions the plan deliberately left open so a post-hoc choice cannot be mistaken for a pre-specified one, reconciles the exclusion arithmetic from source records to analysed records, and lists what a reader could not regenerat...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Model Based Meta AnalysisReviews Model-based meta-analysis evidence pack for the L3 task «Model-based meta-analysis». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Model-based meta-analysis and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of model-based meta-analysis; approve or submit related documents; ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Model Supported Biowaiver JustificationReviews Model-supported biowaiver justification evidence pack for the L3 task «Model-supported biowaiver justification». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Model-supported biowaiver justification and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of model-supported biowai...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Module 5 PlacementReviews the placement of clinical study reports within CTD Module 5 — verifying that each study is filed in the correct subsection (5.3.1 through 5.3.5), that the filing structure matches the study types, and that the Module 5 table of contents is consistent with what actually appears. Use when asked to verify Module 5 organization before filing. Do not use for study content review, for 2.7.x summary review, or for deciding which studies to file.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Multiplicity Inference Exposure ResponseReviews Multiplicity and inference in exposure-response evidence pack for the L3 task «Multiplicity and inference in exposure-response». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Multiplicity and inference in exposure-response and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome o...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review New Indications PopulationsReviews New indications and populations evidence pack for the L3 task «New indications and populations». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for New indications and populations and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of new indications and populations; approve or su...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Noael Hed MrsdReviews NOAEL to HED to MRSD evidence pack for the L3 task «NOAEL to HED to MRSD». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for NOAEL to HED to MRSD and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of noael to hed to mrsd; approve or submit related documents; select or adjust a d...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Nonclinical Synthesis Human ReadinessReviews Nonclinical synthesis for human readiness evidence pack for the L3 task «Nonclinical synthesis for human readiness». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Nonclinical synthesis for human readiness and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of nonclinical synt...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review ObesityReviews Obesity evidence pack for the L3 task «Obesity». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Obesity and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of obesity; approve or submit related documents; select or adjust a dose; speak for the sponsor to an agency.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Oncology Dose OptimisationReviews Oncology dose optimisation evidence pack for the L3 task «Oncology dose optimisation». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Oncology dose optimisation and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of oncology dose optimisation; approve or submit related documen...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Outsourcing Scope Budget DeliverablesReviews Outsourcing scope, budget and deliverables evidence pack for the L3 task «Outsourcing scope, budget and deliverables». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Outsourcing scope, budget and deliverables and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of outsourcing s...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Overdose Antidote GuidanceReviews Overdose and antidote guidance evidence pack for the L3 task «Overdose and antidote guidance». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Overdose and antidote guidance and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of overdose and antidote guidance; approve or submit...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Paediatric Dose SelectionReviews Paediatric dose selection evidence pack for the L3 task «Paediatric dose selection». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Paediatric dose selection and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of paediatric dose selection; approve or submit related documents; ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review PaediatricReviews Paediatric evidence pack for the L3 task «Paediatric». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Paediatric and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of paediatric; approve or submit related documents; select or adjust a dose; speak for the sponsor to an agency.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Parameter Plausibility Unit IntegrityReviews Parameter plausibility and unit integrity evidence pack for the L3 task «Parameter plausibility and unit integrity». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Parameter plausibility and unit integrity and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of parameter plausi...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Pbpk Biopharmaceutics ModellingReviews PBPK and biopharmaceutics modelling evidence pack for the L3 task «PBPK and biopharmaceutics modelling». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for PBPK and biopharmaceutics modelling and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of pbpk and biopharmaceutics modellin...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Pharmacometrics DeliverableAssembles the evidence a qualified human needs before signing off a pharmacometrics deliverable, and refuses to sign it. It inventories the pack and names what is absent rather than omitting it, checks version consistency across plan, report, code and outputs, assesses fitness against each stated intended use and flags extrapolation beyond the studied exposure range or population, tests whether a reviewer who did not build the model could assess it, and drafts the record of what the sign-off ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Pk Analysis PlanReviews a PK analysis plan or the clinical pharmacology contribution to an SAP before the data exist. It traces objectives to planned analyses in both directions so an objective nobody planned to answer is caught before reporting, tests whether each analysis could be executed without a new decision and names the decisions it defers, checks that analysis populations are determinable from recorded data and that every analysis names one, and records the timing of each analysis relative to unblin...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Pkpd Sampling ScheduleReviews a PK or PD sampling schedule before a study fixes it, mapping each objective to the parameters it requires and reporting which the schedule cannot characterise. It assesses peak coverage as bracketing rather than a single sample at a predicted Tmax the study exists to test, states how many terminal-phase points are expected above the quantification limit and where that expectation came from, checks a PD schedule against the effect time course rather than the PK times, and flags sample...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Pmr Pmc CommitmentsReviews post-marketing requirement (PMR) and post-marketing commitment (PMC) wording, study designs, and timetables for clinical pharmacology content — verifying that each commitment is scientifically feasible as worded, that the proposed design answers the stated question, and that timetables are internally consistent. Use when reviewing draft PMR/PMC language before agreement with an agency. Do not use for PMR/PMC execution tracking, for post-approval change impact, or for deciding what to ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Pmr Pmc Execution Close OutReviews PMR/PMC execution and close-out evidence pack for the L3 task «PMR/PMC execution and close-out». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for PMR/PMC execution and close-out and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of pmr/pmc execution and close-out; approve or su...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Portfolio Review Timeline CommitmentsReviews Portfolio review and timeline commitments evidence pack for the L3 task «Portfolio review and timeline commitments». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Portfolio review and timeline commitments and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of portfolio review...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Post Approval Change ImpactReviews Post-approval change impact evidence pack for the L3 task «Post-approval change impact». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Post-approval change impact and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of post-approval change impact; approve or submit related doc...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Post Approval Label UpdateAssesses a proposed change to an approved US label. It maps which other sections carry a fact the change alters and flags any the proposal omits, checks whether the proposed wording is stronger or weaker than the evidence behind it, and runs the check nobody runs - whether statements that are staying unchanged are still true afterwards, since new evidence can make an untouched sentence wrong. It also separates evidence-driven changes from changes required only because another section moved. U...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Pregnancy LactationReviews Pregnancy and lactation evidence pack for the L3 task «Pregnancy and lactation». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Pregnancy and lactation and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of pregnancy and lactation; approve or submit related documents; select o...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Privacy Pk Pharmacogenomic DatasetsReviews Privacy in PK and pharmacogenomic datasets evidence pack for the L3 task «Privacy in PK and pharmacogenomic datasets». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Privacy in PK and pharmacogenomic datasets and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of privacy in pk...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Protocol Pk SectionsReviews the clinical pharmacology content of a study protocol or amendment — dose rationale, PK/PD sampling, bioanalysis, subject restrictions, embedded PK analysis, and consent-document consistency for PK/genomic procedures — producing a source-located open comment list for qualified review. Use when asked to review or comment on CP/PK protocol sections before a study runs, or to reconcile protocol/sample/consent versions and procedure presence. Do not use to judge consent adequacy, vulnerab...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Publications Congress PresentationsReviews Publications and congress presentations evidence pack for the L3 task «Publications and congress presentations». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Publications and congress presentations and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of publications and congr...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Qt Concentration QtcReviews QT and concentration-QTc evidence pack for the L3 task «QT and concentration-QTc». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for QT and concentration-QTc and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of qt and concentration-qtc; approve or submit related documents; sele...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Quantitative Systems PharmacologyReviews Quantitative systems pharmacology evidence pack for the L3 task «Quantitative systems pharmacology». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Quantitative systems pharmacology and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of quantitative systems pharmacology; appro...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Registry Real World PkReviews Registry and real-world PK evidence pack for the L3 task «Registry and real-world PK». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Registry and real-world PK and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of registry and real-world pk; approve or submit related documen...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Regulatory Precedent AnalysisReviews Regulatory precedent analysis evidence pack for the L3 task «Regulatory precedent analysis». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Regulatory precedent analysis and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of regulatory precedent analysis; approve or submit rel...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Renal ImpairmentReviews Renal impairment evidence pack for the L3 task «Renal impairment». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Renal impairment and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of renal impairment; approve or submit related documents; select or adjust a dose; speak for t...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Safety Margins Against Toxicology ExposuresReviews Safety margins against toxicology exposures evidence pack for the L3 task «Safety margins against toxicology exposures». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Safety margins against toxicology exposures and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of safety mar...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review SafetyReviews For safety evidence pack for the L3 task «For safety». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for For safety and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of for safety; approve or submit related documents; select or adjust a dose; speak for the sponsor to an agency.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Sample Size PowerReviews Sample size and power evidence pack for the L3 task «Sample size and power». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Sample size and power and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of sample size and power; approve or submit related documents; select or adjust...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Sentinel Dosing Subject Safety DesignReviews Sentinel dosing and subject-safety design evidence pack for the L3 task «Sentinel dosing and subject-safety design». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Sentinel dosing and subject-safety design and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of sentinel dosing ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Signals Exposure ComponentReviews Signals with an exposure component evidence pack for the L3 task «Signals with an exposure component». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Signals with an exposure component and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of signals with an exposure component; a...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Study Concept And ObjectivesReviews a study concept for whether it answers a question the programme needs answered, while changing it is still cheap. It restates each objective as a question with an answer set and flags those that cannot fail, since an objective no result can fail cannot inform a decision, checks answerability element by element against the proposed design, flags objectives the programme can already answer or could answer with a model instead of a study, and lists the gaps the study will not close. Use ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Study Conduct PkReviews an assembled pharmacokinetic data package prepared for a dose-escalation or safety-review committee, checking that it is internally consistent with the listings it was built from, complete against what it is required to contain, and consistent with the previous cohort's package — producing a source-linked register of open items for a qualified clinical pharmacologist. Use this skill when someone asks to check, QC or sanity-check an already-assembled cohort PK package, escalation-meeti...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Study Model Waiver DecisionsReviews Study versus model versus waiver decisions evidence pack for the L3 task «Study versus model versus waiver decisions». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Study versus model versus waiver decisions and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of study versus ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Submission Datasets Define XmlReviews the submission-ready analysis datasets (SDTM, ADaM) and their define.xml metadata for clinical pharmacology content — verifying that PK concentration, parameter, and dose datasets carry the variables the analysis plan requires, that define.xml maps match the actual dataset structure, and that CDISC compliance is internally consistent. Use when asked to QC datasets before eCTD filing. Do not use for analysis plan review, for statistical analysis, or for CDISC implementation.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Target Product Profile InputsReviews Target product profile inputs evidence pack for the L3 task «Target product profile inputs». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Target product profile inputs and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of target product profile inputs; approve or submit rel...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Precision DosingReviews Therapeutic drug monitoring and precision dosing evidence pack for the L3 task «Therapeutic drug monitoring and precision dosing». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Therapeutic drug monitoring and precision dosing and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcom...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Topline Interpretation Team ReadoutReviews Topline interpretation and team readout evidence pack for the L3 task «Topline interpretation and team readout». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Topline interpretation and team readout and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of topline interpretation...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Uspi Section 12 ContentReviews Section 12 of a draft US Prescribing Information, and the quantitative basis of the statements in Sections 2, 7 and 8, against 21 CFR 201.57(c)(13), the December 2016 clinical pharmacology labelling guidance, and the source data each statement claims to rest on. Use this skill when someone asks to review, QC, check conformance of, or trace the numbers in draft labelling clinical pharmacology content — for example "does Section 12.3 carry everything the content list requires" or "trace...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Uspi Section 2 DosingReviews US prescribing information Section 2 dosing content against the evidence behind it, in both directions. It traces every dose adjustment to a supporting exposure finding and checks direction and magnitude rather than the presence of a citation, then runs the reverse check that finds the real defects - exposure findings with neither an instruction nor an explicit statement that no adjustment is needed. It also checks administration conditions against the biopharmaceutics evidence and co...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Uspi Section 7 InteractionsReviews US prescribing information Section 7, Drug Interactions, against the interaction evidence behind it. It reconciles the Section 7 entries against the clinical pharmacology interaction subsection in both directions, so a characterised interaction missing from Section 7 is caught as well as a Section 7 entry with no evidence, compares direction and magnitude rather than presence alone, and flags management advice that does not scale with the effect or names no actionable threshold. Use i...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Uspi Section 8 PopulationsReviews the clinical pharmacology content of a US Prescribing Information Section 8 (Use in Specific Populations) — verifying that each population subsection carries statements traceable to PK, PD, or modelling data, that dose modifications in Section 2 are consistent with Section 8 findings, and that the populations studied are represented. Use when asked to review or QC Section 8 CP content. Do not use for Section 12 review, for SmPC population sections, or for deciding dose modifications.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6
- Review Vulnerable Population ProtectionReviews Vulnerable-population protection evidence pack for the L3 task «Vulnerable-population protection». Produces a source-linked finding register with denominators and an explicit refuse list. Use when a practitioner asks to work this topic — e.g. \"Please review the materials for Vulnerable-population protection and produce a sourced finding register \\u2014 do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome.\". Do not use to decide the outcome of vulnerable-population protection; approve o...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 6