
Claude Skills by Intense-Visions
github.com/Intense-Visions> Ship zero JavaScript by default — hydrate only the interactive components that need it, exactly when they need it.
> Run React, Vue, Svelte, Solid, and Preact side-by-side in one Astro project with full framework isolation and shared reactive state via nanostores.
> File-based routing maps your `src/pages/` directory structure to URLs — static, dynamic, and rest-parameter routes all follow the same filesystem convention.
> Build REST API routes, webhooks, and form handlers inside your Astro project using `.ts` endpoint files and the middleware API.
> Control rendering mode at the project level and per-page — combine static pre-rendering with server-side dynamic pages using `output: 'hybrid'` and adapter configuration.
> Animate page navigations with native browser View Transitions API, persist interactive islands across pages, and hook into the transition lifecycle.
> Rule-based brand-semantics audit. Detects (a) tokens used in forbidden contexts per their `$extensions.harness.brand.forbidden_contexts` metadata (BRAND-T001) and (b) UI copy containing phrases listed in `DESIGN.md ## Brand Rules → voice.forbidden_phrases` (BRAND-V001). The 4th composed verifier in `harness check-design`, alongside audit-component-anatomy, design-craft critique, and detect-design-drift.
> Detect missing required anatomy parts in component definitions and missing-anatomy-component patterns in composition. First programmatic enforcer of component-anatomy rules — finds what design-component-anatomy reference content prescribes.
> Install, calibrate, verify and diagnose a local usage-pace HUD — an always-visible statusline plus reminder hooks that show weekly burn, flag when a session's context has stopped paying for itself, and refuse to report a comfortable green they have not earned.
> LLM-judgment critique of command-line ergonomics quality — the ceiling counterpart to mechanical CLI checks. The direct structural twin of harness-docs-craft, but with no rule-based floor twin: a mechanical linter can confirm a flag is documented, but only judgment can tell whether the name is predictable, whether the help teaches, and whether the error says what to do next. Emits 3-axis findings (tier × impact × confidence per ADR 0019).
> LLM-judgment critique of code quality / readability for TS/JS source — the ceiling counterpart to the rule-based code floor (`harness-cleanup-dead-code` for dead code / drift, `harness-enforce-architecture` for layer boundaries + import direction, and complexity thresholds). The floor keeps code from being broken or forbidden; code-craft asks whether it is any good — does it reveal intent, is the control flow honest, does each abstraction earn its keep, would a senior nod or wince. Per-unit...
> LLM-judgment critique of prose-in-code across six surfaces: error messages, log lines, CLI output strings, commit subjects, PR descriptions, and code comments. Primary domain is error messages (universally bad in most codebases). Third member of the craft-pipeline initiative. NO rule-based floor exists — pure ceiling. Emits 3-axis findings (tier × impact × confidence per ADR 0019).
> Create performant CSS animations with Tailwind transitions, keyframe utilities, and motion-safe considerations
> Build type-safe component variants with class-variance-authority for consistent, composable styling APIs
> Scope CSS to components with CSS Modules for collision-free class names and co-located styles
> Build reusable styled components with Tailwind, CVA variants, and polymorphic prop patterns
> Implement dark mode with Tailwind's dark variant, CSS custom properties, and user preference detection
> Define and manage design tokens for colors, spacing, typography, and effects in Tailwind CSS
> Style accessible headless components from Radix UI and Headless UI with Tailwind data-attribute selectors
> Build common layouts with Tailwind flexbox and grid utilities for dashboard, marketing, and app shells
> Optimize CSS performance with content-visibility, containment, efficient selectors, and Core Web Vitals-friendly patterns
> Build responsive layouts with Tailwind's mobile-first breakpoints, container queries, and fluid typography
> Resolve Tailwind class conflicts intelligently with tailwind-merge for safe className composition and overrides
> Apply Tailwind CSS utility-first patterns for consistent, maintainable component styling
> The mechanisms that make ACID guarantees real: Write-Ahead Logging ensures atomicity and durability, fsync ensures persistence to physical media, and crash recovery replays the WAL to restore a consistent state.
> ACID guarantees that database transactions are processed reliably: each transaction is all-or-nothing (Atomic), leaves the database in a valid state (Consistent), operates as if no other transactions are running (Isolated), and once committed, persists even through crashes (Durable).
> The simplest hierarchical model where each row stores a reference to its parent, traversed with recursive CTEs for subtree and ancestor queries.
> Recording who changed what, when, and why, using trigger-based or application-level change tracking with immutable append-only logs.
> The default index type in PostgreSQL and MySQL, B-tree indexes support equality and range queries on ordered data with O(log n) lookup performance.
> In a distributed system, when a network partition occurs, you must choose between consistency (every read returns the most recent write) and availability (every non-failing node returns a response) -- you cannot have both simultaneously.
> Storing all ancestor-descendant pairs in a separate table for O(1) subtree and ancestor lookups with manageable write costs.
> Multi-column indexes that accelerate queries filtering on column combinations, governed by the leftmost prefix rule and the ESR (Equality, Sort, Range) column ordering strategy.
> External connection poolers like PgBouncer sit between the application and database, multiplexing many application connections onto fewer database connections to prevent connection exhaustion.
> Tuning max_connections, understanding per-connection memory overhead, and right-sizing database connections for on-premise and serverless environments.
> Indexes that contain all columns needed by a query, enabling index-only scans that skip heap table access entirely.
> Deadlocks occur when two or more transactions hold locks and each waits for a lock the other holds; prevention through consistent lock ordering and detection through timeout-based abort resolves them.
> Intentionally introducing controlled redundancy into a normalized schema to eliminate expensive joins or aggregations, applied only after measured proof of a performance problem.
> Using JSONB columns to store semi-structured data alongside relational tables, with indexing strategies and guidelines for when to embed vs normalize.
> A schema pattern for storing dynamic, user-defined attributes as rows instead of columns -- usually avoided in favor of JSONB or polymorphic alternatives, but occasionally justified for genuinely unbounded attribute sets.
> If no new updates are made, all replicas will eventually converge to the same value -- a consistency model that trades immediate agreement for higher availability and lower latency.
> Add new structure, migrate data, remove old structure -- the three-phase pattern for safe column renames, type changes, and table restructuring.
> How to read query execution plans to identify performance bottlenecks, row count misestimations, and missing indexes.
> Indexes on computed expressions and specialized index types (GIN, GiST) for non-scalar data like JSONB, arrays, and full-text search.
> Every column holds a single atomic value, no repeating groups exist, and every row is uniquely identifiable by a primary key.
> Modeling vertices and edges in SQL tables for social graphs, dependency networks, and recommendation systems with recursive queries -- and knowing when SQL stops being practical.
> Optimized for equality-only lookups with O(1) average access time, hash indexes are smaller than B-tree when range queries and ordering are never needed.
> Choosing between adjacency list, nested sets, closure table, and materialized path based on read/write ratio, query patterns, and tree depth.
> Distributing rows of a table across multiple database instances (shards) to scale beyond the capacity of a single server, with careful attention to shard key selection and cross-shard query complexity.
> The four SQL standard isolation levels control which concurrent transaction side-effects are visible, with PostgreSQL implementing them via MVCC snapshots rather than traditional locking.
> Selecting the right isolation level requires matching the workload's correctness requirements against the performance cost and retry complexity of stricter levels.