
Claude Skills by GRCEngClub
github.com/GRCEngClubSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) expert for ICFR-relevant IT and security work. Deep knowledge of 15 U.S.C. §§ 7201 et seq., §302/§404/§906 certifications, accelerated/non-accelerated filer scoping, ITGC testing across the four classic domains (Access, Change, Operations, Development), entity-level controls, IT-dependent manual controls, deficiency evaluation, SOC 1 vendor reliance, and the SEC/PCAOB/DOJ enforcement triangle.
Designs and documents control testing procedures. Creates test plans, executes walkthroughs, and documents results for audit workpapers.
Validates audit evidence artifacts for completeness, timeliness, relevance, and authenticity. Reviews screenshots, logs, configurations, and policies against control requirements.
Generates professional audit findings using the Condition-Criteria-Cause-Effect format. Creates management letter comments and remediation recommendations.
Always use when the user asks to create, generate, draw, or design a diagram, flowchart, architecture diagram, ER diagram, sequence diagram, class diagram, network diagram, mockup, wireframe, UI sketch, GRC workflow, control map, audit process, risk register flow, compliance architecture, or mentions draw.io, drawio, drawoi, .drawio files, or diagram export to PNG/SVG/PDF.
Use when creating a draw.io diagram for audit planning, request lists, evidence, testing, exceptions, remediation, and reporting in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
Use when creating a draw.io diagram for high-level GRC program architecture, continuous compliance operating models, three lines of defense, and executive program maps in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
Use when creating a draw.io diagram for controls mapped across frameworks, systems, owners, risks, and evidence sources in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
Use when creating a draw.io diagram for regulated data flows, data classifications, storage, processing, transfer, access, retention, and logging in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
Use when creating a draw.io diagram for evidence collection, evidence lifecycle, audit evidence pipelines, and systems of record in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
Use when creating a draw.io diagram for mapping controls and obligations across frameworks to show overlap, gaps, and conflicts in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
Use when creating a draw.io diagram for POA&M items, audit findings, remediation milestones, validation, closure, and escalation paths in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
Use when creating a draw.io diagram for responsibility assignments across GRC, security, engineering, legal, HR, procurement, vendors, and auditors in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
Use when creating a draw.io diagram for risk intake, scoring, treatment, exception approval, residual risk, and monitoring workflows in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
Use when creating a draw.io diagram for cloud/SaaS shared responsibility, inherited controls, provider controls, customer controls, and evidence ownership in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
Use when creating a draw.io diagram for compliance scope, authorization boundaries, trust boundaries, in-scope/out-of-scope systems, and system context diagrams in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
Use when creating a draw.io diagram for vendor intake, tiering, questionnaires, security/privacy/legal review, contracting, and ongoing monitoring in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
Helps you triage a quarterly user access review from an Okta, Azure AD, AWS IAM, GitHub, or generic CSV/JSON export. For each row, recommends certify, revoke, manager confirm, or investigate using rules that catch the usual audit-fail patterns: terminated users still active, dormant admin accounts, separation-of-duty conflicts, service accounts in a human review. Drafts manager confirmation emails and writes an audit evidence packet mapped to SOC 2 CC6.1/CC6.2, PCI 7-8, ISO A.9, NIST AC-2. Bu...
Reviews pull requests for compliance regressions. Scans code diffs for security and compliance violations, flags issues, and suggests fixes aligned with frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST 800-53.
Maps infrastructure code (Terraform, Kubernetes, CloudFormation) to compliance controls (ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST 800-53). Analyzes IaC files and generates compliance evidence mappings showing which controls are satisfied.
Generates CLI commands and API scripts to collect point-in-time evidence for audit controls. Automates evidence gathering from cloud providers (AWS, Azure, GCP) and outputs formatted reports.
Generates focused assessor interview questions from a technology stack and maps them to compliance frameworks with practical CLI/API evidence hints.
Converts natural language compliance requirements into executable policies (OPA Rego, AWS Config Rules, Sentinel, Terraform). Standardizes governance by making it part of the build process.
Converts unstructured risk assessments into structured Jira tickets. Extracts Likelihood, Impact, Mitigation from natural language and generates JSON formatted for Jira API with clear Definition of Done criteria.
Tracks compliance status across multiple frameworks. Monitors control implementation, identifies gaps, and generates compliance dashboards and reports.
Manages policy documents through their full lifecycle. Reviews policies for gaps, suggests updates based on framework changes, and tracks approval workflows.
Manages organizational risk registers. Performs risk assessments, calculates risk scores, tracks mitigations, and generates risk reports for leadership.
GRC-specific portfolio questionnaire that creates a site-config.json and SITE-PLAN.md tailored to GRC engineers — certifications, frameworks, audit experience, tools, and projects.
Scaffolds a complete React/Vite website project from site-config.json. Generates components, styles, and configuration based on the site type and plan data.
Sets up GitHub Actions CI/CD workflow for automatic deployment to AWS on push to main. Uses GitHub OIDC for keyless AWS authentication.
Builds the React/Vite site, syncs to S3, and invalidates CloudFront cache. Uses the plugin's bundled deploy.sh script.
Deploys AWS CloudFormation infrastructure stacks for the website (S3, CloudFront, Route 53, ACM, and optionally contact form API).
Validates AWS readiness for website deployment. Checks CLI tools, credentials, SES, Route 53, and ACM. Produces a report with pass/fail and action items.
Creates a GitHub repository for the website project, initializes git, and pushes the code.
Composes week-over-week automation coverage narratives. Use when /report:automation-coverage is running. Frames the delta for leadership around time saved, quality of evidence, and forward-looking compounding value.
Setup guidance for users running a /report:* command before their toolkit has enough context. Use when a report command detects missing findings, frameworks, or history. Walks the user through installation and first collection rather than generating a hollow report.
Audience-specific tone and format guidance for leadership communications. Use when drafting any /report:* output to tune length, framing, and technical depth to the reader (board, audit committee, CEO, weekly CISO, regulator).
Patterns for synthesizing findings across multiple frameworks into one readable portfolio view. Use when a /report:* command is pulling from more than one framework plugin and needs to avoid drowning the reader in control IDs.
Translates GRC findings, risks, and program activity into language leadership actually reads. Use when any /report:* command is composing output intended for a CISO, CIO, or above. Opinionated rules on what lands and what doesn't.
Analyzes vendor security questionnaire responses. Identifies red flags, gaps, and areas requiring follow-up. Supports SIG, CAIQ, and custom questionnaires.
Calculates vendor risk scores using inherent and residual risk factors. Generates risk ratings, comparisons, and treatment recommendations.
Conducts comprehensive vendor security assessments. Evaluates vendor security posture, identifies risks, and generates assessment reports with recommendations.
Use `gcp-docs` when implementation guidance needs current Google Cloud, Google Workspace, Firebase, Android, Chrome, or related public Google developer documentation. This is a knowledge-source plugin. It does not emit Findings. It returns citations and grounded answers that other plugins can use in remediation guidance, evidence procedures, and control implementation notes. Requirements: - Enable the Google Developer Knowledge API in a Google Cloud project. - Create an API key restricted to ...
Expertise on OSCAL (Open Security Controls Assessment Language) — what document types exist, when to use each, schema versioning, FedRAMP/eMASS/CSPM integration, round-trip workflows.
Explains a single control once and shows every framework it maps to via the SCF crosswalk. Resolves SCF IDs, framework-specific IDs, and plain-English descriptions. Never reproduces normative text.
Tutor that produces working primers on GRC frameworks and roles. Adapts depth to the learner's background. Never reproduces copyrighted standard text — paraphrases and references control IDs.
Drills the user on a framework with application-level scenario questions. Inspired by mattpocock/skills/grill-me. Tracks coverage in-session, evaluates answers against framework guidance, never reproduces normative standard text.
Build and deploy a production-ready Trust Center for any company. Use this skill whenever someone asks to create a trust center, compliance portal, security page, or wants to publish their SOC 2/SOC 3/ISO 27001/HIPAA/compliance posture publicly. Also triggers when someone mentions gated document access for audit reports, NDA-based document sharing, or wants to replace paid trust center tools like Secureframe, Vanta, Drata, or SafeBase. Even if they just say "I need a place to share my SOC 2 w...
Guide a research project through the full academic lifecycle — from raw idea to concrete research question, literature grounding, methodology, writing, feedback, and publication. Use this skill whenever the user shares a research idea, asks to "flesh out" a topic, wants sources or a literature review, asks about methodology or research design, wants to write or structure a paper, asks about peer review, publishing (independent, conference, journal, or preprint), co-authorship, author order, o...
Use when interpreting AWS Secrets Manager connector output, deciding between inspector and retrieve modes, drafting SCF-mapped controls for rotation / KMS / public-access / inactive-access findings, or troubleshooting an aws-secrets-inspector run.